 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
<< < 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 > >> 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 21:01:56 Otsikko: Re: chessmec Muokannut danoschek (12. Heinäkuu 2005, 21:02:37) they can't let me be visible on heret as I won't stop to demand a monitor function,
that shows transparently which fiddle-dweeb deleted what (own baiting included) on which board, hidden persons listed for everyone with DATES when and by whom ... ~*~ 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 21:01:18 Otsikko: Re: [OT] strange ... but can me somebody explain this? chessmec: Moderators hide people too. I'm sure they have thousands silenced. It's easier (for them) than having a debate. Just ignore the ghosties ;) 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 21:00:41 Otsikko: Re: [OT] strange ... but can me somebody explain this?  chessmec: Moderators can choose to hide someone from all users - that is what you are seeing.... well not seeing.
* * * * PLEASE - Lets get back to FEATURE REQUESTS EVERYONE! 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:58:28 Otsikko: Re: If children learn to debate, then they will learn to think for themselves. nobleheart: Kids would be better off with a sense of reality, life's gonna hit 'em eventually anyway. Parents should quit trying to get off the hook for raising their hoodlums by forcing others to stifle. Oh yeh, and TV is not a babysitter. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:57:29 Otsikko: Re: [OT] strange ... but can me somebody explain this? BIG BAD WOLF: I tried to hide somebody for testing ... then a list appeared that I had set this persopn to hidden. I took it back and all got OK.
So I have nobody hidden here. Hey ... it is necessary to run a cron at my server, WGETting every 15 seconds http://brainking.com/game/Board?bc=3 ?! 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:53:15 Otsikko: Re: [OT] strange ... but can me somebody explain this? grenv: no, i have NOBODY on hidden. But I noticed that all postings from danoschek are suddenly not here ... 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:52:03 Otsikko: Re: [OT] strange ... but can me somebody explain this? chessmec: Yes, when someone is hidden - they can still post, and it will show as a "new" message, but no one will see them. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:51:40 Otsikko: Re: [OT] strange ... but can me somebody explain this? chessmec: You must have hidden someone? 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:50:11 Otsikko: [OT] strange ... but can me somebody explain this? I opened brainking.com Main-Page and saw "2 new" standing next to board "Feature requests". I went into the board and saw only one new. Why that? Are there postings hidden or what? 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:39:55 Otsikko: Re: If children learn to debate, then they will learn to think for themselves. Rex Nihilo: I agree,if kids were exposed to more than gansterism,rap music,pot & video games..they might actually start having a few neurons firing. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:37:57 Otsikko: Re: gekrompen hoofd: Muokannut danoschek (12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:38:38) yeah right - not on the very own channels of the stalinistic nomenclatura after all.
supporting posts get deleted hastily, while the bully-flatulence stays wondrously long until they look goofed and ugly as they are under comeback of my verbal superpower. ~*~ 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:34:42 You can't win in an autocratic society  12. Heinäkuu 2005, 19:22:29 Otsikko: the cloak mode should be limited to 90 mins per day - I demand that the focus is on serious players,
not on the spampest that needs twilight for their heinous ways. mods should not be allowed to cloak altogether. we want to see to which cosanostra the fiddlefreaks belong ... ~*~ 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 19:21:20 Can we get back to serious feature requests please? Grenv, there is a f/s for debating if you should choose to join it. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 18:22:53 Otsikko: Re: Pedro Martínez: I was putting my support, in a round about way, for free and open debating. I know this is considered radical and dangerous to some though. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 18:22:03 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 18:15:16 Otsikko: Re: grenv: My humble and sincere apologies to those offended. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:51:41 Otsikko: Re: Rex Nihilo: Watch out, you may have to say "all heck will break loose" on this board. People have been banned for less. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:40:42 Otsikko: Re: grenv: If children learn to debate, then they will learn to think for themselves. If that happens, all hell will break loose. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 07:23:53 Otsikko: brings me also back to a request not commented yet. e.g. after I faced certain noriousness on let's say, two boards, try to avoid trouble and hide, but shortly later *heckle heckle* on the next board you know.
my suggested global board-hide option would be good not only for serious players then. ~*~ 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 06:10:00 Otsikko: Re: Czuch Chuckers: Debating is bad for children now? Heaven forbid they learn to develop an opinion or two early in life. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 03:20:57 Otsikko: Re: nobleheart: I wholeheartedly agree, but I think the more appropriate place in in a private fellowship... it can be too much for small children without parental guidence. 12. Heinäkuu 2005, 03:18:51 Otsikko: Re: I was curious as to why you left me alone on some of my comment in the civilization fellowship.... I finally realized that you are now a pawn :) 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:45:48 Otsikko: Re: Czuch Chuckers: debate is fine if done intelligently,as I am sure you would agree.it can be stimulating & opens the mind uop to opposing viewpoints.
but I would hope it would not degenerate into name calling & childishness. some people cant deal with someone not agreeing with them. 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:27:13 Otsikko: Re: certain mods then Fencer: It was the suggestion that others might think of... that their paid membership could EVER buy numbers 1 and 2... Your reply, I assume, means it's not to happen :) As opposed to other sites that bend over backwards, making one not even want to consider a free membership there... 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:21:32 Otsikko: Re: certain mods then  WhiteTower: What does the paid membership have to do with me? 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:17:33 Otsikko: Re: certain mods then Fencer: It was slightly aimed at you as well :> but you're the boss here, so...
I used to write policies for IRC networks, so it's quite easy to put such things in words, and with users like dano around, it's very easy to find material ;) 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:11:03 Otsikko: Re: certain mods then WhiteTower: Very well said. I should add it to FAQ. 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 16:08:21 Otsikko: Re: certain mods then danoschek:
1. Paying for a membership doesn't buy the right that your suggestions be automatically implemented, or even considered, as you may have already noticed... 2. Paying for a membership certainly does not buy you the right to rant and rave when your voice is lost in the desert... 3. Paying for a membership DOES give you the capability to hide other people's opinions, although you might find yourself very much by yourself in most DBs :) 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:53:24 Otsikko: Re: Eriisa: i think he means 'vacation' 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 15:47:45  Could someone please define what is a vacancy function? A vacancy in a hotel is an available room. Is this an available game? 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 13:37:39 Otsikko: Re: chessmec: Muokannut danoschek (11. Heinäkuu 2005, 13:43:13) I reckon it was no affront. Unlike my pleasant call for clarifying the vacancy function
which was hastily deleted on mem-only by one prospecting personal gain just in blur. PM's (last visible) flatulence here may be the encyphered request for czech holidays. ~*~ 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 13:02:58 Otsikko: Re: Fischer time indication  AbigailII: aggreed that the time displayed isn't necessarilly the total game time left.
But as it is now, a value is still displayed, and it's the value that is valid at each moment. Anyway, my point was to have an indication that allowed us to distinguish between the two type os time control. How it is done and it's full implications I'll leave it to Fencer ;) 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 12:49:57 Otsikko: Re: Fischer time indication pauloaguia: Game time left can only be determined for games with a Fisher clock, and a 0.0 increment/move, can't it? Since a lot of players will not play any such games, using another column takes, IMO, too much screen estate for its return. OTOH, if Fencer also added another configuration parameter, which indicates which columns you see on your running games lists (for instance, I personally don't care to see the name of the tournament - and with it gone I can see more games without scrolling as many tournament names are long enough to cause wrapping). 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 12:38:06 Otsikko: Fischer time indication On the Main Page game list, each game has a reference to how much time there is left. But there is no distinction between time left for the move or time left for the game. The later definitelly need some special attention and shouldn't be mingled between the rest of the games (and only come to the top of the list when their time is running out).
Can this information please be added? Some suggestions:
I personally prefer the second and hate the third (but I always add even the ideas I hate - it may trigger some good ones as well). 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 09:14:25 Otsikko: Re: chessmec: They tend to hold personal vendettas as well. There are still certain boards that I'm banned from simply because I spoke out against their disorderly conduct. 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 08:22:24 Otsikko: Re: gekrompen hoofd:
(no 'tiny tyrannies' for Mod regime which blamed me to be "racial slur" and did not cancel an apperently affront sicne about 12 hours (see a posting from 10. Juli 2005, 20:41:08 here) 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 07:55:35 Otsikko: Re: nobleheart: This idea for a 'World Events' board has been both suggested and declined in the past.
Btw, you can't be a Co-Mod unless you pay for it.
I happen to think it'd be a good feature, so long as it was run fairly (no 'tiny tyrannies' for Mod regime). If such a board were created, the possibility for 'rants' would always be there, because most people can't hold a real debate without slinging mud in the other guy's face. However, this also might draw in more potential customers into BK, a'cuz 'Everybody loves to watch the fights' 
But.. it's up to Fencer, idinnit? :P 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 07:37:05 Right, BK Freedom of Speech, reserved for the elite :P 11. Heinäkuu 2005, 00:48:22 Otsikko: Re: nobleheart: IMO, There is no way you could have a public environment mor world watch board without using the word 'debate' in the description!
There are plenty of the types of topics you suggest being discussed and debated currently in the form of fwellowships. Just another good reason to upgrade your membership :) 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 23:08:52 I think it is a great idea to have a few "subject related links" posted above the books board.
I think it would be a good suggestion for each board to have such a related links list. ------- I think a board for "art & culture" would be a good suggestion.I could consider co-moderating.but I think before I speak,it would be wise to read what it means to be a moderator. ------ considering current events world wide. maybe a board for "enviroment & world watch issues" might be of interest. but I would hope it wouldnt to too contraversal.and if it became so,could people debate & even agree to disagree without it decaying into a rant war? 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:33:43 Otsikko: okay so we had to learn that correct vacancy is no feature and I grant you religious reasons then it is sunday. any answers beyond humbug which would even require
a minimum of logic, like for three-and-a-half-checks chess e.g. as well are not appropriate today - it's considered being kinda work. I understand. ~*~  10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:17:03 Otsikko: tripping fingers Muokannut danoschek (10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:17:59) MY QUESTION
(or no chance to get an qualified answer without inessential maneuvers, as german ?) ~*~ danoschek but again you try to evade the issue 10. July 2005, 20:10:49 Modified by danoschek (10. July 2005, 20:14:06) (sorry that I'm not czech to gain due attention without buttkissing) - why will I time out in this game although I have been on vacancy ? tell and I shut up. ~*~ 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:14:32 Otsikko: Re: purple where do you see 'started games' - it was beneath 'finished games' before somebody FIDDLED it away. Fencer: okay..thanks 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:12:44 Otsikko: Re: purple where do you see 'started games' - it was beneath 'finished games' before somebody FIDDLED it away. bwildman: Do you have some? Send it to info@brainking.com. 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:11:39 Otsikko: [OT] black heart (was: Re: purple where do you see 'started games' - it was beneath 'finished games' before somebody FIDDLED it away.) bwildman: any chance we could get a black heart added to the icon list?
please explain my what is the meaning of the symbol "black heart"? 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:10:49 Otsikko: but again you try to evade the issue 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:09:13 Otsikko: Re: purple where do you see 'started games' - it was beneath 'finished games' before somebody FIDDLED it away. Fencer: any chance we could get a black heart added to the icon list? 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:07:56 Otsikko: oh right on others' profile it is still - sorry - maybe
I quit thinking unharmed after the recent fiddling ... unlike the average smoothtalker, I'm able to admit. ~*~ 10. Heinäkuu 2005, 20:05:30 Otsikko: LOL.. what he said! << < 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 > >> |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |