 |
|
 Chess variants (8x8)including Amazon, Anti, Atomic, Berolina, Corner, Crazy Screen, Cylinder, Dark, Extinction, Fischer Random, Fortress, Horde, Knight Relay, Legan, Loop, Maharajah, Screen, Three Checks For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Community Announcements: - Nasmichael is helping to co-ordinate the Fischer Random Chess Email Chess (FRCEC) Club and can set up quad or trio games if you send him a PM here. Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
<< < 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 > >> 26. Tammikuu 2003, 01:04:38 Otsikko: Re: Need help! I didn't have this problem that Blind Fury says. Could it be something else happening? 25. Tammikuu 2003, 23:51:43 Otsikko: Re: This may sound stupid... to Charles: with a three check variation i think white doesn't have any chance. It is easy for black to avoid checks 24. Tammikuu 2003, 18:46:56  What do you mean "frozen"? You are in check, you must move your king or queen. 24. Tammikuu 2003, 18:39:08 It is a classic stalemate position. If it is acceptable in normal chess, why not here? 24. Tammikuu 2003, 18:13:57 Otsikko: strategy Making moves that reveal the board is as important as a good chess position. Pawns are very important because of their ability to see a lot of the board when properly placed. Knights are great in forward positions to reveal the enemy defenses. Good luck everyone. 24. Tammikuu 2003, 17:05:03 my game with user "timetrex" seems to have frozen.
can anything be done to 'un-freeeze' it? 24. Tammikuu 2003, 15:40:56 Otsikko: Need help! I can't see the Black pawns very well on the Brown Squares! It there anyway that I can change the board color or put a bit of white in the black pawns. 24. Tammikuu 2003, 15:01:27 point taken mate. still think it sucks. lol
cheers 4 da help amigo 24. Tammikuu 2003, 14:44:13 Otsikko: Re:  Sure, but thats the challenge! Before you took his next-to-last pawn you should have made sure he had at least one square left to move to! 23. Tammikuu 2003, 19:49:24 And could you recommend some good strategy? ;-) 23. Tammikuu 2003, 19:06:18 Thank you for adding this game...this is a favorite...:} 23. Tammikuu 2003, 14:53:03 by the way. any plans for an ANTI-Horde Chess? i think it would be pretty cool! 23. Tammikuu 2003, 14:51:45 Otsikko: Re: i understand that. but what i was saying was that my pieces dominated the board. i had the oportunity to take his last pawn and was unable as his pawn could not move and it was declared a draw. 23. Tammikuu 2003, 12:35:53 pdj... read server news on your front page, the rules have changed slightly so that white has to take EVERY black piece to win.
If black has one piece left but is unable to move because you are blocking him then its like stalemate and declared a draw. It makes things a bit more even for both players! 22. Tammikuu 2003, 18:01:55 Otsikko: Re: This may sound stupid... (reply to Uil) If that is the case, maybe throw in the three check variation as well. 22. Tammikuu 2003, 15:49:26 Otsikko: Draw I was playing my friend (user checkm8) and i was, for want of a better phrase 'whoopin' his ass'. he was left with one pawn while i still has my queen, 2rooks, a knight and a pawn. i has his pawn stuck between my rook and my pawn so he could not move and the game was declared a draw. is this correct. because by my standing i thought it was fairly obvious that i has won.
thanx PDJ 20. Tammikuu 2003, 19:29:45 Otsikko: Re: RULES - stalemate Done! 20. Tammikuu 2003, 17:50:01 Otsikko: Re: This may sound stupid... A loop variation makes ir a bit more balanced, but with a good black opponent white will NEVER take a piece 19. Tammikuu 2003, 11:17:56 Otsikko: Re: RULES - stalemate Thanks! 19. Tammikuu 2003, 09:39:01 Otsikko: Re: suggestion Will be done :-) 19. Tammikuu 2003, 09:37:18 Otsikko: Re: RULES - stalemate Hmmm, that's interesting idea. Okay, I'll change it. 18. Tammikuu 2003, 20:03:35 Otsikko: Re: Rules - stalemate That could even things up a bit for the black player. It would certainly make it more difficult for the white player! 18. Tammikuu 2003, 19:37:12 Otsikko: RULES - stalemate I have played this games on other sites, and always been awarded a draw when playing black, and all my pawns blocked from moving.
However, I was shocked that the rules on this site state a loss for this situation. This is what happened in my game against Swoosh, and it cost me my number 1 ranking! I propose that the rules be changed so that it is a DRAW if black still has one or more pawns left and cannot move. 17. Tammikuu 2003, 20:01:21 Otsikko: suggestion An indicator indicating how many times one has been in check by the player's name and captured pieces would be a nice feature. 17. Tammikuu 2003, 06:09:05 Otsikko: Re: This may sound stupid... A loop variation.!!! That seems like a pretty decent idea actually. :) 17. Tammikuu 2003, 03:31:36 Otsikko: This may sound stupid... But I have an idea to make this game more evenly balanced. When white takes a piece, allow him/her to place that piece back on the board anywhere as a white piece instead of a black piece. Perhaps it could be offered as a different variation altogether, like Loop Maharajah Chess. Then again, the designer of this site maybe a bit busy right now to do such a thing, or it just not might be that great of an idea. Regardless, I do enjoy this site and am grateful to have an opportunity to voice an opinion. Take care. 3. Tammikuu 2003, 12:55:59 Thanks Kevin, I missed "and can not make a legal move" 3. Tammikuu 2003, 03:11:51 Otsikko: Re: stale mate The game rules state:
Anti Chess This rules of this game are the same as for normal Chess (starting position and piece movement) with the following differences: -There is no check or checkmate. -Who loses all pieces including the king or cannot make a legal move, wins the game. -Capturing of the opponent's pieces is mandatory. The player can make a move only with a piece that can capture an opponent's piece, and he/she must capture this piece. Only if the player cannot capture any opponent piece, he/she can make a move with any piece. 3. Tammikuu 2003, 00:34:04 Otsikko: stale mate when you or your opponent can not move a piece is that a draw (stale mate)? 28. Joulukuu 2002, 18:28:13 Yes, it is promoted. And it is hidden in this line of the rules:
The rules are the same as for normal chess with these differences: [and the list of extra horde chess features] :-) 28. Joulukuu 2002, 17:00:31 If a white pawn makes it to the other side (like THATS gonna happen!!) is it promoted as in normal chess? I'm sure it would be, but I cant see anything about it in the rules. 26. Joulukuu 2002, 00:39:08 Otsikko: Re: between good players white always wins, i have played it on often on IYT, that is the reason I only accept 2 game matches 12. Joulukuu 2002, 18:46:48 Otsikko: Re: a rules question You are right, I will add it to the rules. 12. Joulukuu 2002, 13:59:17 Otsikko: Re: a rules question apparently not, hrlqns won. good game! 12. Joulukuu 2002, 13:57:13 Otsikko: a rules question not clear from the rules: what happens if no black pawn can move? is it a draw, like stalemate?
(or white for that matter, but I really don't see how that can happen) 10. Joulukuu 2002, 19:00:17 Otsikko: Re: Ian... care to prove that on the board?! 10. Joulukuu 2002, 17:48:05 Otsikko: Re: Honestly your not as bad a i am.:) 10. Joulukuu 2002, 15:41:07 Otsikko: Re: Ha ha ha, point taken, I'm a really crap chess player!! LOL!!! But even a crap chess player needs a damn good player to lose when playing black in Maharajah!! But hey, no matter how bad I am, you've proved it can be done!! 10. Joulukuu 2002, 13:48:43 Otsikko: Re: thanks. no offence, but white still needs a LOT of help from black to win :) 8. Joulukuu 2002, 07:09:04 Otsikko: FAQ's . have and thanx.... 7. Joulukuu 2002, 14:31:56 Hey, it is already included in FAQ! Read the article about unrated players. 7. Joulukuu 2002, 11:10:30 I'd just like to give a public CONGRATULATIONS to rabbitoid, possibly the first player here to win Maharajah playing WHITE?
And yes, it was me he beat!! Nice one rabbitoid, I didn't think it could be done but you proved me wrong!!! 6. Joulukuu 2002, 22:15:30 So do I. I hope it will be enough to have both players' chances balanced. 6. Joulukuu 2002, 19:56:41 I'm finding this LOADS better now pawns can't promote! 6. Joulukuu 2002, 19:06:58 Otsikko: Re: o ok thanx...will ck* it out 6. Joulukuu 2002, 19:05:47 sammeegirl: Since you are not the only one who asked about this BKR thing, I'll add it to FAQ :-) 6. Joulukuu 2002, 19:01:46 Otsikko: Re: i guess I dont make myself clear on things sorry...just wondering how the rate goes for non players when a rated one wins or when a rated one loses to a non rated player?...after 4 games is completed......and thanx for fixing the *bug* oh and have to comment you on a wonderful site filip....its awesome!!!! and I would imagine many would say the same..... << < 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 > >> |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |