Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas.
FromHell: Why just a few people talk at this discussion board ? According to your estimate there are only 64 chinese chess players on the established list and only abt 20 would like to talk abt anything on this board....
here are the actual numbers of players on the lists at the monent...... for chinese chess Established BKR 61 active players Provisional BKR 104 active players Established 213 Inactive Provisional 642 inactive how many unrated players ?
Beren the 32nd has post on this board , he is NO.139 on the Pro inactive list he also is no.126 on the chess list
what i meant is that every one has chance to talk at this board including those unrated players.
For Chess Established 695 active players Provisional 847 active players Established 2676 inactive Provisional 6507 inactive unrated players ?
I also found the chess discussion board people just chat to each other with no specific subject abt chess
the reason for the "Silence" at this board, I think it is because people are not willing to talk and they have nothing abt chinese chess in mind to talk abt. it depends on how much they know abt the game....
Your figures support what FromHell said. Inactive means are no longer playing, possibly have not even logged onto the site for years. Why would an unrated player be interested in discussing a game he don’t play?
Look at the chess board more closely, there is very little general chat. There was a big debate a while back over a technical point on ice age chess but other than that very little general chat.
As currently number 14 on the established grades in Chinese Chess I have no illusions that my standard of play is poor (and before you ask I have no desire to improve) and I would suggest there are no more than 5-6 strong chinese chess players on the site. I currently have either established or provisional rankings in 37 games on the site, do you expect me to engage in discussions on all of them? If not why should I treat Chinese Chess differently?
If an interesting point came up, an interpretation of the rules for example, I would be interested but posts about how your games are getting on are of little interest to anyone but yourself.
If you seriously want a discussion about Chinese Chess I would suggest this is the wrong site, you need to find one that specialises in the game.
(piilota) Jos et halua muiden käyttäjien näkevän mitä olet tekemässä, voit vaihtaa piilotilaan muuttamalla asetuksia (vain maksavat asiakkaat). (pauloaguia) (näytä kaikki vinkit)