 |
|
  BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Cavalier. Mode: Tout le monde peut poster
<< < 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 > >> 27. Mars 2006, 14:25:13 Sujet: Time moved made? Is there a time shown when my last move was made? I thought I had played all of my games yesterday.
Top 10% Faster Backgammoners for 2006-03 But this morning less than 24 hours after I played I had 3 games time out. They time controls listed 2 Days with Bonus. 27. Mars 2006, 13:05:25 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Vikings: could be .. will test it out on a fs board :) 27. Mars 2006, 05:32:27 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing mook53lhd: Silkwood has not been on the site for the last 5 months 27. Mars 2006, 04:43:08 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Silkwood: just curious i don`t know from gamesheets. but i have 2 opp & 18 slots left it says so . i take it you`re talking of something else? 26. Mars 2006, 22:23:36 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing  Hrqls: you mean I can test reply here.. and see where it fits in the list? 26. Mars 2006, 20:25:11 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Hrqls: I believe that your post will go below the post that you replied to which was your own post, unless someone else were to reply to that message first 26. Mars 2006, 20:04:33 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Fencer: shouldnt my post at 12:13 on the 26th then be directly beneath silkwoods post instead of at the bottom ? 26. Mars 2006, 19:19:32 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing  Hrqls: Timestamps are not important in the thread view. The tree structure of roots and leaves is shown. 26. Mars 2006, 19:14:14 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Fencer: although it shows some weird sorting as the post from mook53lhd shows above my previous 2 posts, while those were made earlier on the day :) 26. Mars 2006, 19:07:33 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Fencer: very good. i like the way you incorporated .in other words if you`re browsing & a post catches your eye.you can find all posts relating to it.thats much better than some of the so called pro message boards .not complicated at all. you can find something old & buried & look it over & even ressurect the old subj. good show. as if you`re not a regular its ezy to get disgusted when cliques are just shooting the breeze ,but not saying anything + making it virtually impossible to just enter a msg without feeling like an unwanted interloper tyvm mook53lhd 26. Mars 2006, 12:13:41 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Hrqls: hah! that enwidened (?) the box again :) 26. Mars 2006, 12:13:02 Sujet: Re: Number of games playing Silkwood: another test :) 26. Mars 2006, 04:29:16 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! Hrqls: testing .. testing.. one .. two.. 3 26. Mars 2006, 01:54:27 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! Fencer: Judging from the posts concerning this change, I hope it shows you how important the discussion boards and posting are to this site. 25. Mars 2006, 21:10:21 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!!  Eriisa: I like it!!!! 25. Mars 2006, 21:05:18 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!!  Eriisa: awesome! hats off to fencer! :) 25. Mars 2006, 20:18:13 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!!  Hrqls: hey, this box is so much easier too! 25. Mars 2006, 20:01:54 25. Mars 2006, 20:00:10 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! Fencer: ah nice!
hehe i just noticed the boxes dont get smaller anymore .. i guess we reached the minimum size (width) :) 25. Mars 2006, 19:59:31 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! Hrqls: lol .. the most-new posts in the thread are at the bottom though :( ... and they are getting smaller and smaller .. so as long as enough people answer to this thread their replies will disappear before shown :) 25. Mars 2006, 19:59:01 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! Hrqls: Works only for those with enabled JavaScript.  25. Mars 2006, 19:58:23 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! wow! nice! and a small box-link is also added next to the reply button :) 25. Mars 2006, 19:12:07 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! volant:  25. Mars 2006, 18:11:24 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!!  Groucho: and a raise! 25. Mars 2006, 07:07:00 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! Eriisa Fencer needs to keep that programmer! 25. Mars 2006, 03:57:49 Sujet: Re: Now I get it!! Vikings: *whispers* Its a conspiracy, you know! 25. Mars 2006, 02:15:44 Sujet: Now I get it!! Pedro Martínez: 
thanks 25. Mars 2006, 01:05:44 Sujet: Exactly!  Vikings:  25. Mars 2006, 01:03:18 Sujet: Re: show thread Vikings: but you can change it! 25. Mars 2006, 01:00:48 Sujet: Re: show thread Pedro Martínez: maybe there is something that I am missing, if the reply button was hit, wouldn't the header in this case say re: show thread unless someone erased it and changed it? 25. Mars 2006, 00:51:18 Sujet: Re: show thread Vikings: The header is not necessarily important. The "Reply" button is. 25. Mars 2006, 00:41:42 Sujet: Re: show thread BIG BAD WOLF: I must be thick in the head tonight, shouldn't they be different treads since they have different headers 24. Mars 2006, 23:32:21 Sujet: Re: show thread  Vikings: That was me - I actually replied to those 2 very old post (from 2002) just to see if it worked with post from way back then. (one of the first on the board) :-) 24. Mars 2006, 23:28:37 Sujet: Re: show thread I wonder if it has a small bug, I just clicked on this tread and it showed two more post that weren't related 24. Mars 2006, 23:14:44 Sujet: Re: show thread BIG BAD WOLF: now that is AWESOME!!!!
 24. Mars 2006, 21:50:02 Sujet: Re: show thread BIG BAD WOLF: Yes, I've used it too. Pretty cool addition! 24. Mars 2006, 21:40:43 Sujet: Re: show thread  BIG BAD WOLF: I just did now thats kewl. 24. Mars 2006, 21:31:47 Sujet: show thread Did anyone else notice the new "show thread" feature? I replied to a post from 2002 to see how well it works.
Way to go Fencer! It's hard to follow some threads! 21. Mars 2006, 00:30:15 Sujet: Re: posts  emmett:I agree with you that Harley is a very good moderator, but I also disagree that she is the only one. There are a lot of very good moderators on this site as well as some that might be questionable. I do hate to see them all lumped together as not good in your post. 21. Mars 2006, 00:10:06 Sujet: Re: Tuesday: As for creating my own fellowship, I'll have to think about it. Since Pawns can't join and some people won't for a variety of reasons, I see little use in doing so. Perhaps I could create a general discussion fellowship and let all join that wish to and have the topic change from time to time or just let any subject be discussed. 21. Mars 2006, 00:07:30 Sujet: Re: posts modifié par Walter Montego (21. Mars 2006, 00:28:35) emmett: It is in most ways not worth my trouble. So I'm not going to bother with it any more until I see some changes or am actively sought out for my help or opinion.
I've said enough and it should be apparent as to where my sentiments lie. I am talking about moderation issues, not multi nics and handles. Why this keeps getting confused is beyond me. The two can be related. The multi-nics thing is just one of many subjects that have shown to me what is wrong with the moderation system. As I can't go to where I can post about it, that's the end of it unless things change. 20. Mars 2006, 23:52:04 Sujet: Re: posts emmett: I agree with alot of what you have just said, along with alot of what others have said on the subject.....I don't think your post should be deleted either!
I wish multi nics were an impossiblility!! I hate to see people abusing peoples emotions, even on a game site! 20. Mars 2006, 23:27:13 Sujet: Re: Walter Montego: well yes, for paying members because only paying members can have or be in fellowships. It's a priviledge for paying members. But anyone who is a paying member can create their own fellowship for anything they want. There have been many made for moderating issues. In fact, Kipling may still have one. I'm not sure. But you can create a fellowship for anything you want. 20. Mars 2006, 23:24:53 Sujet: Re:  Walter Montego: Invite them! I'd join, if I'd be welcome. I'm sure many others would too. 20. Mars 2006, 23:23:24 Sujet: Re: Tuesday: It is an idea, but what's the point? Just how am I going to get those that I want to talk to to join? 20. Mars 2006, 23:22:03 Sujet: Re: baddessi: You mean paying members, right? Perhaps you and Harley can use your pull with the Big Boss and get me in. It obviously isn't without precedent having a non-moderator as a member. Even if let in, it will only be this group and not the whole of the membership. For those of us that like to post and have issues with how the moderation system is set up on this site there's nowhere to air our thoughts on it to a general audience of all of us. 20. Mars 2006, 23:18:24 I haven't had a look through fellowships in a long time.
I'm sorry you feel that way, Walter. Maybe Tuesday has the answer, start your own fellowship. 20. Mars 2006, 23:16:08 Sujet: Re: harley: actually, I think there used to be a couple of them.(fellowships about Mods open to all members)...
Clay had one, Thad had one and so did Taz. If I'm not mistaken, those are all gone now. << < 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 > >> |
Date et heure
Amis en ligne
Forums favoris
Associations
Astuce du jour
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, tous droits réservés Retour en haut |