Nom d'utilisateur: Mot de passe:
Enregistrement d'un nouveau membre
Modérateur: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages par page:
Liste des forums de discussions
Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Cavalier.
Mode: Tout le monde peut poster
Recherche dans les messages:  

<< <   423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432   > >>
6. Juin 2005, 16:49:04
bwildman 
Sujet: Re:
harley: he was baited by you.

6. Juin 2005, 16:47:24
coan.net 
Sujet: Re: cloak mode
Bluefin: When you are in cloak mode, you can no longer see what other people are doing.

(So since they can't see what you are doing - you can't see what they are doing type of thing.)

So that is why you see "disabled when you are cloaked" under some people

6. Juin 2005, 16:47:17
Mort 
Sujet: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: "but I can tell you that it was more then just a "SINGLE word" that lead us to our actions."

Thing is BBW, those other words concerned only came in after the person was hidden for one word which the same moderator the other night just asked another person to edit out.

One person is being treated one way for a minor thing and another is treated differently. If the person was asked to remove the word and refused and then after being hid then carried on I could understand the actions taken.

6. Juin 2005, 16:46:46
harley 
Sujet: Re: cloak mode
Bluefin: I've never used cloak mode myself but I believe when you are cloaked, you lose the ability to see what uncloaked people are doing. Kind of like if we can't see you then you can't see us Thats probably what the message is you're seeing.

6. Juin 2005, 16:44:28
harley 
Bwild, I was the moderator who you say first 'took action' against the individual you're talking about.
There was nothing biased about it. He swore, I placed him on hide. Simple as that. I'd do it to any member, be they moderators of the board they swear on or someone I've never had dealings with before. I messaged him to inform him of my action.
His actions after that prompted me to take it to the other globals, as this is an individual who we've had many, many problems with and a kind of ongoing discussion.
After another discussion between us all, it was decided to remove him as moderator. It is his own actions that caused the decision to be made, and it wasn't one we made lightly or without much deliberation and he had many chances given to him first.

6. Juin 2005, 16:43:46
bwildman 
Sujet: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: casting the first stone?
you try to keep me from voicing my concern by saying I'm stirring trouble,and should take this conversation to a fellowship where only a few would see my concerns.
you highlight one rule.
when I wrote the code of honor...BBW changed the wording to allow grey areas.after the code was implemented by Fencer....the mods then voted to bend the code.its a joke.

6. Juin 2005, 16:41:08
Bluefin 
Sujet: cloak mode
I know what cloak mode is, but, what is
disabled when you are cloaked ? I see this below some of my opponets names ?

6. Juin 2005, 16:31:08
ClayNashvilleTN 
bwildman:On many occasions Globs are requested by Mods to intervene. There are a few Members/Mods that seem to delight in creating constant problems.
They go from board to board harassing, using profanity attacking fellow Mods, trying to stir needless turmoil.

The amazing thing Bwild, 70% of the members know exactly of whom your concerned about. His numerous actions of immaturity and lack of respect for numerous BK members could not continue to go unchecked. He hurt BK and offended numerous memebers and attacked them openly and without concern. He cannot ride rough shod over the members of BK and expect to have much sympathy after he had been warned time and time again by members, Mods and Globs.

He sneered at the "MODS CODE OF HONOR"

Moderator's Code Of Honour

To up hold the BrainKing.com user agreement.
To promote goodwill among the members of BrainKing.com
To set an example by which other members should follow (stay out of flame wars, no insults, etc..)
To be fair and equal to all posters of your boards (don't let friends post stay when you would normally edit/delete)
To notify the Mod Squad of any major moderating actions. This will allow all Moderators to be aware of situations in case the overflow onto other boards.

6. Juin 2005, 16:14:45
bwildman 
cloak and daggers....lets hide what REALLY goes on around hre,huh?

6. Juin 2005, 16:13:00
bwildman 
Sujet: Re:
Andre Faria: it was a review,as I recall...and not one of yours.
my point is...the global mods feel it is their job to ride herd on certain individuals....and to the point of being biased in their opiions and moderating towards these individuals.

6. Juin 2005, 16:12:40
Stevie 
BBW....I give permission to discuss it publically, but not in pm

6. Juin 2005, 16:11:12
coan.net 
Sujet: Re:
bwildman: Again, just that 1 word was not the reasons action was taken - there is more to the story, more which I'm not going to go into detail here because - well you are not the person involved.

If that person would like me to talk to you about the issue more, then they can let me know that and I will send you a message. Other then that, I can not get into more detail here.

6. Juin 2005, 16:07:27
Andre Faria 
Sujet: Re:
modifié par Andre Faria (6. Juin 2005, 16:08:20)
bwildman: The word edited in the music board was in a normal message, or was in a review of an album? For instance, the name of one of the tracks of the album... the context of the message may be important for their decision...

6. Juin 2005, 16:07:24
bwildman 
Sujet: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: if BK rules were followed...we would not be having this discussion.(which by the way..Fencer can read and put in input if neccesary)
who determines if a word(used reglarly by 70%of all adults) is to be considered profanity?

6. Juin 2005, 16:02:14
bwildman 
Sujet: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: my experience with f/s that are intended to help make changes keeps me from wasting my time with them.
this is an issue that concerns all members...not just the "click" that joins certain fellowships.

6. Juin 2005, 15:58:50
coan.net 
Sujet: Re:
bwildman: How are the Global Moderators run unchecked? All (Yes, ALL) the discussion made about global moderating issues are done in a board where Fencer reads and inputs when needed.

The Global Moderators do not want to run the boards, but it is our jobs to make sure the boards are ran according to BK rules.

6. Juin 2005, 15:58:40
ClayNashvilleTN 
Discussing it here is not the place. Arrangements have been made to handle such issues where those that are concerned about Complaints of Globs/Mods can observe the details of both parties and draw their own conclusions.

These type discussions do not need to be hammered out on public boards!

Please take it here?

Moderator Complaints

6. Juin 2005, 15:55:32
bwildman 
more huffing and puffing in my opinion.
how long will it be before every discussion board is anned by global mods? there are rules and regulations for discussion board mods...yet global mods run unchecked.
will I be removed as a moderator for posing this issue?

6. Juin 2005, 15:52:05
Stevie 
Sujet: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: so why dont you let these people on BK know what the swear word was???
You are making it sound like it was the worst word ever.... why not tell them the truth that it was a minor one, and one that many dont find offensive anyways

6. Juin 2005, 15:50:40
Stevie 
LOL it aint number 1 anymore.... belive me

6. Juin 2005, 15:50:16
coan.net 
Sujet: Re:
bwildman: At the time that action was taken on the post, that person was the only one on-line, After more Globals came on-line, stronger action was taken. No, the simple task to edit/delete post with language problems is not something that Globals need to discuss - it is the rules of the site to not use foul language, and any moderator or Global Moderator need to follow those rules of the site.

6. Juin 2005, 15:49:59
ScarletRose 
and is a family site.. Please respect our younger members and those who enjoy this site by keeping angry and harsh topics off the MAIN boards.. expecially if there are adequate spots elsewhere to discuss ..

6. Juin 2005, 15:48:08
Stevie 
Sujet: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: bollocks BBW

6. Juin 2005, 15:45:17
bwildman 
Sujet: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: that doesnt answer my question.
why then....if you "discussed it" did the one global mod that this person has a bad history with...be selected to take action against this individual? the board history shows the global that 1st took action.That action was biased,and unfair...especially since it was the boards main moderator that that action was used against.
are you tryng to tell me that the nitial action taken was 1s discussed by all global mods? or are you merely trying to justify yet another example of biased moderating by global mods.

6. Juin 2005, 15:34:17
coan.net 
Sujet: Re:
bwildman: The Global Moderators have discussed this issue and many others in detail, and it is not the decision of just one Global that makes and takes action against a person - but something that we agree with as a group. (Note: A discussion that is made which Fencer can read and input on our discussion.)

I really do not want to start giving out the details about action taken with a moderator in public or to other parties other then the moderator affected, and will be happy to discuss it more with the person involved - but I can tell you that it was more then just a "SINGLE word" that lead us to our actions.

6. Juin 2005, 15:26:26
bwildman 
Sujet: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: you as well as me...are entitled to opinions.
global mods are important to BrainKing.com....and as such,members need to kow what they can expect of these individuals.
Last time I checked...this board is for issues concernig BrainKing.com

6. Juin 2005, 15:20:48
ClayNashvilleTN 
Sujet: Re:
bwildman:If you are sincere about resolving the problem, there are avenues to do so. Presenting it on this board is inappropriate.

Please use the "Moderator Complaint f/s" or contact one of the Mods that isn't biased against, for whom you speak.

Public discussion of Mods actions, tend to stir trouble and create needless turmoil.

6. Juin 2005, 15:07:09
bwildman 
the reason I ask this...some monthes ago,a member used un appropriate language on the Music board.the word was edited by a global mod.
yet...on the Motor board...instad of using this same procedure...this same global mod hide a user for using a SINGLE word...many do not find offensive. is it coincedence this gobal mod seems to dislike this person? how can global mods be "unbiased" if thy allow their personal feelings color thier moderation?
if a global mod has issues with an individual...shouldnt they refrain from any moderation of a particular individual...and let an UNBIASED moderator do the RIGHT thing?

6. Juin 2005, 15:02:38
ClayNashvilleTN 
Sujet: Re:
bwildman:Join the Moderator complaint f/s and present your case.

There are several on there open and willing to discuss those issues.

You will find them open and willing to discuss any issue.

6. Juin 2005, 14:53:24
bwildman 
what is the use in having global moderators,if they weild justuce unfairly?

6. Juin 2005, 05:32:17
Evil Bratt 
Sujet: Re: PC.......Computer
Cranky Franky: Yes

6. Juin 2005, 04:45:46
engram 
Sujet: Re: PC.......Computer
Evil Bratt: Yes, but you will need something sharp to scratch it with.

Sorry, I came straight here from the jokes boards...

Do you mean build it from stratch? Using parts to build your own PC?

6. Juin 2005, 04:28:32
Evil Bratt 
Sujet: PC.......Computer
Can you make a PC with scratch?????

6. Juin 2005, 01:14:16
baddessi 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
mrloupcity: That is so sweet of you- I couldn't accept that- for the same reason you can't buy more. It wouldn't be fair to the other players, but it's very nice of you to offer. Thank you! I used them- I should have paid better attention. And the good news is that people playing against me know I'll be moving very quickly!!!LOL
Thank you again- that was very thoughtful!

I like the 'get out of jail free card' idea!

6. Juin 2005, 01:02:37
DeaD man WalkiN 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
baddessi: I would be glad to give u like 5 of my vacation days, if that would be ok with THE BIG BOSS
I just think they should make a get out of jail free card for BG games, so when u get locked on the board. hehehe
:o{P

5. Juin 2005, 21:29:24
baddessi 
Pedro- you're dead!!! LOL!!

Whoops! I didn't realize that Black Queen was Black Brain King's wife....guess I'm disqualified.
I just liked the sound of it- sounded kind of 'dangerous'.
And it's also a very good song written by Stephen Stills- one of my favorites : )

5. Juin 2005, 21:27:03
Pedro Martínez 
How 'bout White Queen? *runs for shelter*

5. Juin 2005, 21:25:48
baddessi 
Black queen? I LIKE THAT!

5. Juin 2005, 21:23:24
baddessi 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
LOL at Pedro- I was gold for a bit..I save up my lunchmoney and do it for as many months as I can at a time. It's a little tight at the moment. But I will be gold again. People have worked hard to keep this place a positive one and it shows!

Fencer- I know it wouldn't be fair. In case anyone should misunderstand, I was only joking

5. Juin 2005, 21:23:22
tazman7474 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
Fencer: doesn't that come with unlimited vacation days? lol

5. Juin 2005, 21:20:53
Fencer 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
Pedro Martínez: Black Queen position is open too.

5. Juin 2005, 21:20:20
Fencer 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
baddessi: Right. It wouldn't be fair to other players.

5. Juin 2005, 21:18:53
Pedro Martínez 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
modifié par Pedro Martínez (5. Juin 2005, 21:19:58)
baddessi: That's correct, Barb...:)
BTW, what are you planning uprgrading to? Golden Rook or Maharajah??? :)

5. Juin 2005, 21:17:50
baddessi 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
Fencer: I don't suppose you get more when you upgrade, do you?
No more till January 1st, right?

5. Juin 2005, 20:56:45
baddessi 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
Fencer: thanks Fencer. Bummer!

5. Juin 2005, 20:41:08
Fencer 
Sujet: Re: Vacation days
baddessi: No, the database records say you really used all 30 days of vacation this year.

5. Juin 2005, 19:52:29
baddessi 
Sujet: Vacation days
I recently noticed that I no longer have any vacation days. I have had a busy week with some things preventing me from playing as often as I normally do, but I still managed to log on every day and move the quick games that were getting ready to time out. I may have had one or two in the red, but not that many that I know of to have used all my vacation days.
But last I looked, I had something like 17 vacation days left and now they are all gone.
Has anyone else had this trouble- is there some sort of bug?

5. Juin 2005, 05:50:54
Bernice 
Sujet: Re:
bwildman: I thought we already had the daggers LOLOL

5. Juin 2005, 00:22:47
Left in disgust 
Sujet: Re: cloak?
It's really interesting to see the male/female points of view about the cloak mode!

I still don't see any difference in 'cloak mode' .... I can still see what everyone else is doing .... not that I want to!

4. Juin 2005, 23:40:26
Stevie 
Sujet: Ive been informed
Im hidden on members board, shame the person who done it ... dont have the balls to pm me to let me know

<< <   423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432   > >>
Date et heure
Amis en ligne
Forums favoris
Associations
Astuce du jour
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, tous droits réservés
Retour en haut