Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Liste des forums de discussions
Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Pion.
Yeah, Sandy gets a call from the prez when a Right wing talk show host calls her a slut. Good for the prez. Just like when he called Sarah Palin when the left was calling her a slut. Oh wait, he didn't call her when that happened.
Well, at least when an MSNBC host called a conservative raido talk show host a slut, Obama called her. Oh wait, Obama didn't call her either.
hmmmm, guess it's not just those on the right. Seems like the left does it all the time. Just check into Twitter.
Sandra is gonna be a lawyer. She is having so much sex she needs government help paying for it (even though she can get contraception's free - that's right folks: FREE). By her own testimony, she spends about 1000$$ a year on contraceptives.. That mathematically means she's having sex at least 5 times a day.
The real story here is that as a lawyer to be, she's learning to screw a lot of people even before she officially becomes a lawyer.
Sujet: Re: By her own testimony, she spends about 1000$$ a year on contraceptives.. That mathematically means she's having sex at least 5 times a day.
Artful Dodger: Really... anyone having the pill is having sex 5 times a day...
What about the case Miss Fluke stated?
"Her testimony included the case of a fellow student who needed birth control to control ovarian cysts.
Georgetown, a Catholic university with a prestigious law school, does not cover birth control to prevent pregnancy in its student health plan, and the student, who is gay, could not convince the insurance company she was ill."
"She is having so much sex she needs government help paying for it "
No she wants her health plan (from a religiously affiliated institution) to cover it.
"The real story here is"
That Limbaugh is now apologising as his advertisers are abandoning him.
(V): Anyone that spends 1000 per year as Fluke said she does could only do that if they are having sex non stop. It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy and condoms are free via Planned Parenthood.
And an exceptional case isn't the standard we should hold up to raise everyone's insurance costs.
Fluke doesn't have to have sex. She wants to have it and wants others to pay for it. You need a basic economics less here Jules. If insurance companies are forced to offer the coverage she advocates, we will all pay higher premiums.
Jules, I looked in your previous posts and couldn't find where yo posted about Letterman when he called Palin a slut. Nor when an MSNBC host called Laura Ingraham a slut. And then Ann Colter, Michelle Malkin, and Michelle Bachman...all called foul names by those on the left. But like your missing posts on these incidents, there was no left wing outrage either.
BTW, I've never listened to Rush. Nice try but you missed the ball. And Rush will overcome this.
BTW, those "advertisers" that left Rush - interesting that they stayed with MSNBC even though it was on that network that Ingraham was called a slut.
And they say that the Left has no standards. Well, they in fact do have standards. -Double Standards-
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
Artful Dodger: ..... Is there a new pill that women only take once a month? Otherwise... it's 1everyday, or 21 days of the month (depending on the pill and woman)
Which (using the 21 day scenario) is 21 x 4 x 12 ie 1008
"You need a basic economics"
Looks like you need basic knowledge on how contraception is used!!
"when he called Palin a slut."
Maybe the word "slut" I don't find really that bad. It was the likes of this...
""If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something for it. We want you post the videos online so we can all watch," he said on Thursday.""
....and his seemingly male need to call the woman a prostitute. Looks like he's threatened by the idea a woman can be in charge of her ability to have or not have children.
"BTW, I've never listened to Rush."
Never said you did.
"even though it was on that network that Ingraham was called a slut. "
Again, you seem to be concentrating on that word "slut".. as Jon said, that is pettyfogging.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
(V): ""If we are going to pay for your contraceptives, and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something for it. We want you post the videos online so we can all watch," he said on Thursday.""
Wow, he really said that? Unless he also says the same about a dude who got a vasectomy or uses Viagra paid for by insurance needing to post their videos as well, this is pure misogyny. The name calling by Ed Schultz and whoever else is also unacceptable, but what Limbaugh said is pure evil.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
lizrising: Not pure evil. What Hitler did to innocent people, cooking them in gas chambers, that's pure evil. What Rush said was just stupid. Comments like yours are why conservatives like myself don't take what you say seriously.
Now it seems the argument is that it's ok to call a woman a slut but not ok to ask for pictures.
It's simple Liz, it's all bad. You don't call a woman a bimbo or a slut or suggest she post videos. It's all bad. Letterman was wrong as was Ed as was Rush. Bill Mahr gets away with his foul name calling because as he said, he doesn't have sponsors. (his exact argument for why what he says is not wrong)
Slavery is pure evil. Molesting children is pure evil. Murder is pure evil. Raping is pure evil.
How you can seriously put Rush's comments in the same category is puzzling.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
Artful Dodger: By demanding videos he is insinuating that he owns Fluke's body because "he paid for" (he didn't actually) her birth control. Yes, that is evil and completely unacceptable.
"Now it seems the argument is that it's ok to call a woman a slut but not ok to ask for pictures."
Others may say that but not me. I think that is completely unacceptable as well and I don't support Ed Schultz or David Letterman or Bill Maher for name calling either.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
lizrising: BTW, you inferred it. You are projecting that he implied what you are saying. And clearly Rush was being sarcastic and trying to be over the top. He certainly wasn't being serious.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
Artful Dodger: I was referring to Rush asking to see sex tapes. Ed did not do that.
I am not the complete liberal apologist you think I am. I am critical of everyone in the media. Actually, sometimes I even agree with the things you post here.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
lizrising: So calling a woman a slut is just bad form but asking for sex tapes is pure evil? You can't be serious? That is a huge double standard! Both are equally wrong. Maybe it's just that Rush is a conservative and that's your biggest beef.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
Artful Dodger: Calling someone a name is not equal to demanding something of someone as though you own them. Somehow you turned "completely unacceptable" into "bad form." Stop turning my words around.
Carbonite stock approaches 52-week low since dropping sponsorship of Rush Limbaugh show While Carbonite decides to drop it’s sponsorship of the Rush Limbaugh show over their faux outrage over the whole Sandra Fluke situation, while continuing to sponsor misogynist Ed Schultz is dropping like a rock. As of the closing bell on Monday, March 5th, 2012, Carbonite’s stock dropped to $9.15 per share. They actually hit their 52 week (or one year) low during trading of $9.09 per share. Oh, and the 52 week high for Carbonite stock was $21.10. Seems like they have quite a business model running there huh?
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
lizrising: It's your own personal interpretation that Rush suggested he "owned" Fluke. That is laughable. You're making this up as you go. The real standard of a liberal is the double standard.
And liz, you originally said unacceptable, NOT completely.
Something that is unacceptable can also be bad form. I have the better view: equally bad. Equally unacceptable. Equal! You're still making excuses.
Sujet: Re: It's 4 bucks a month for the generic pills at the retail pharmacy
lizrising: "The name calling by Ed Schultz and whoever else is also unacceptable, but what Limbaugh said is pure evil."
nonsense
I've already explained to you what real evil looks like. Don't cheapen it. And your statement above is clearly minimizing the name calling by Schultz. So it's not so bad, according to you, to call a woman a slut. Just inappropriate (like farting in public). Come on!
(Cacher) Si vous passez votre souris sur l'icone de l'abonnement d'un joueur, une infobulle avec ses principaux détails sera affichée. (pauloaguia) (Montrer toutes les astuces)