Please use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE
Liste des forums de discussions
Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Cavalier.
I didnt know that you can remove people after a tournament has started. Seems as a very strange behaviour to me.
Wondering if Pedro ever will get an answer about who is prolonging?
ClayNashvilleTn: Why dont you creat a tournament where the prize is a book, as i saw someone had (Harley i think). I doubt that you need to send the books to Fencer. Then you can put a dollarbill in the book and no more "noise" is needed
I just checked Arpa's profile. He has 258 tournament wins so i dont think he has timed out in so many games :)
The only problem i've had with him is that he wins most of the times :)
LOL AD..since i know your BKR isnt a "faked" one i will gladly say CONGRATS!. When i said "braggers" i was talking about all those who do anything (multipls IDs) for a high BKR. Thats why i think these + x000 tourneys are silly :)..my opinion.
I deleted my posts because "someone" accused me for complaining, i was just curious who kicked me out of the +2100 tourney, the creator or
"auto" and i got the answer:)
Why should any tournament be deleted? All *-* tournaments are free and the "ex-2 year rook prize" has 64 players! There are many free tournaments with no prizes and they have only 5 players, so why delete such a big tourney?
LOL Long John, i suppose the creator has to change name for his tournaments now.
Shouldnt be a problem for him, his profile says he is webmaster for an Othello Union in UK, must be creative? :)
Fencer, cant anything be done at the Tournament list. All "childish" names and even antigames against paying members (Long John free zone is the last example). As far as i know has Long John paid for a pawn and now he has set up a prize tourney with 2 years membership as a prize.
Should he be "rewarded" with an anti tournament just because he seems to have pissed someone off?
I think CHILDISH is only the middle name!
If i were a pawn i should only sign up for a tourney with 1 day/move. If i couldnt find any of those tourneys i should create one. But then of course i had to pay money to become a knight or rook :)
But to complain about how slow/fast other people play isnt so nice :)
He shouldnt invite to a tournament until all rules were 100% done, then he doesnt need to change them..ok?
Ive given this answer to Fencer earlier: Im not the genious, i have no idea how to guard the tournament from cheaters. BUT AGAIN..allow non paying member play and not paying members is wrong in my opinion. Stardust may think whatever he wants..the tournament is hosted by Brain King.
BBW..Im not asking for a favour to join. As you say, why allow not paying members to play and not me (in case i wanted) because my wife is a member here too. It doesnt stop the cheating!!
Im sure many are annoyed but i prefer to share my opinion in public, im not so coward so i hide it in private messages. Ive had a lot of supporting private messages today, sorry i havent replied to them :)
In your first post you said that G Inventor probably would allow my wife and me to play if we asked him "he is a nice guy", now you seem to have changed your mind?
Suppose you are as impressed as i am of how smart the tournament directors have solved the cheating problem.
Cheaters are everywhere you cant get rid of them.
Was more fun before the money entered this site.
They can cheat how much they want..as i said in my first post i have no intention to join, so maybe my wife will "negotiate" with Dano :)
Took me more than 6 months to get my SSN so i shouldnt share it with anyone especially not over Internet....case closed from this end :)
Fencer, my suggestion is that "cheatholes" should be covered in advance.
If Eds 8 family members are paying members at BK they should have every right to play in ANY TOURNAMENT.
Have no intention to play in the $3000 tournament but for future similar tournaments i would like to know:
My wife and i are both paying members (rooks) but only one of us is allowed to participate because we are in the same household.
This means that one of us paying members cant play while not paying pawns are welcome?
Doesnt make sense to me.