Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
Liste des forums de discussions
Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Cavalier.
Vikings: By the way, would you mind if the other person could use auto-pass, even if you don't want to use it (like I think it still does not happen at the moment)?
Carl: because I've paid to actually. you know, play the game. seriously, I have played with auto pass and I do not like it when a game comes back to me after 20 passed moves and I don't recognize it
fukuhara: Can you confirm that this page contains full and exact rules, which means that if this game is added, nobody would complain "hey, you forgot about this and that rule, and this is all wrong, you must delete all running games and rewrite the model"? I have bad experiences with variants that are not well known in Europe.
that's a figure of speech, but what i mean is that i'd like for finished Stairs matches to be made to stand out somehow...the results notices flagged in some way in the Events box, maybe?...so that when a stairs match ends i'll know to go to those stairs and start another match. the red text in the stairs' game lists that shows me which stairs i'm enrolled in is great, and that's the kind of thing i'm talking about; but what i'd like is some way of easily seeing which stairs games i'm signed up for but not currently playing in, so i can go straight to them and start a new match without having to periodically look through all the stairs i'm playing to make sure none of them is lying idle without my knowledge.
KJ: Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but in the message you get, when you win/lose (now in the "Events" box), there is still an offer to invite to a new game. It is all the way at the bottom of the message.
(Though, perhaps not, if it is a person who has invitations turned off, that I'm not sure of)
I'd like to see official Brainking Tournaments, perhaps quarterly, that would include all games at the site. There could also be one tournament of each general type. (i.e. one elimination, one where players all play one game with other players and one where players play two games with every other player. There might also be fast tournaments without vacation or only weekends and slow tournaments which allow vacations so players of all time preferences would be able to find tournaments to their liking.
The players' main pages could show icons (gold, silver and bronze) for official Brainking tournaments next to specific games. Achievements could be tied to winning these tournaments.
100 wins 500 wins 1000 wins 2000 wins 5000 wins win with 1 opponent at home win with 2 opponents at home win with 3 opponents at home win with all 4 opponents at home capture 2 opponent in one turn capture 3 opponents in one turn capture all 4 opponents in one turn
nodnarbo: Lets use an example: 10 people vote on a poll - 3 different options:
Option #1 - 8 of the 10 people vote for this one (so 80% of voters picked this one) Option #2 - 5 of the 10 people vote for this one (so 50% of voters picked this one) Option #3 - 7 of the 10 people vote for this one (so 70% of voters picked this one)
Once I pictured that example, it was more clear to me what you were talking about (hopefully help others & Fencer if he decides to add something like this.)
coan.net: I would also like to see a reminder of how I voted, when the results are tabulated. Once in a while, I can't remember! I guess that sounds dumb, though. But it's true!
nodnarbo: It took me reading your message a few time to understand what you are saying, and now I do - AND AGREE.... maybe a link to toggle back and forth between the current way and the way you propose to take the percentage from the number of voters (and not number of votes).
I would also like to see Opinion Polls be sortable so the top vote winner will be sortable - so when there are polls with 20+ options, it will be easier to see the top voted option.
For checkbox opinion polls where you can choose more than one option I feel like it would be more helpful for the percent listed after the option to be the percent of voters that voted for that option than it is to have the percent of the total votes it got. With polls with 20+ options you could easily have an option that only got 15% of the total votes, but had 80+% of the voters vote for that option. It wouldn't change how the votes are counted, it would just make the popular options stand out more.
Orlandu: The easiest way would be to look at your profile, click on the Fellowships tab, and scroll down, and it shows you what teams you are on in any fellowship.
Hi all, I would like to see greater ability to filter tournament searches. Examples include: Search for tournaments that need just one more player. Allow players to filter out tournaments for games that are not of interest. (Allow the list of tournament games to show only the games desired by the player.) Filter out tournaments that have undesired time limits. Highlight the names of players that a member has no wins against to help in going after some of the achievements. Or allow a search for tournaments that include players that a member has not faced. Talen314
Thom27: This is a great idea... When someone has alot games of one type... it is really needed... I had a frog finder game that I kept guessing the same move 10 times before I noticed...
Ok, now I got it..., then it seems that I will have much more trouble than I thought in getting to the 10 public tournaments in some gametypes (even so, I think the feature request makes sense anyway)
Pedro Martínez: In that case, I should have 3 or 4 game types marked in the achievements page and I only have one. I have always understood that the ones that count for the achievements, and are considered as public (and when counting them it usually makes sense) were only non private tournaments, and of course no-fellowship, because those are on a different achievement (which is also being bug counted)
aaru: It's more like public+private. The fellowship are on another tab..., but for that you can go to the finish games tab, and you won't have to filter by game type, because you have all the information there
Could there be a quick indication of how many public tournaments have we won for a certain gametype (I think I have won 10 public tournaments on 2 game types, but in my achievement page it only shows 1). This could be useful when only one tournament is missing for a game type to count for an achievement, so instead of having to enter the won tournaments page (especially if you are trying 50 or 100 tournaments per game type) you could simply watch the number and choose the one(s) that would be easier or faster to do so
Sujet: Re:I was going to mention the "Who is online" link in the "Statistics"
rod03801: & Pedro Martínez: I meant that I'd like to see an option that would allow us to see what members actually click on the fellowship (i.e.The ORIGINAL Flame Pit) to read, as on the Chat board. Besides most members I find are in a cloak mode when looking at "Who's on-line" so there is no way to tell what members are actually involved in a fellowship.
(Cacher) Si vous voulez jouer une partie contre un adversaire d'un niveau équivalent au votre, vous pouvez définir un BKR compris dans un intervalle lors de la création d'une nouvelle partie. Dès lors, personne ayant un BKR en dehors de cet intervalle ne pourra y accéder. (Katechka) (Montrer toutes les astuces)