Nom d'utilisateur: Mot de passe:
Enregistrement d'un nouveau membre
Modérateur:  Walter Montego 
 Chess

Chess Discussion

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


Messages par page:
Liste des forums de discussions
Vous n'êtes pas autorisé de poster des messages dans ce forum. Le niveau d'adhésion minimal requis pour poster dans ce forum est Pion.
Mode: Tout le monde peut poster
Recherche dans les messages:  

<< <   8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17   > >>
17. Mai 2005, 21:34:17
votacommunista 
Sujet: Re: errr
ColonelCrockett: what is IYT? -v please

17. Mai 2005, 21:36:31
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: errr
chessmec: .... ~*~

17. Mai 2005, 21:42:09
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: errr
modifié par danoschek (17. Mai 2005, 21:46:12)
ColonelCrockett: oh I see, your memory has still not improved ... I was
the guy who never was with some one unless in spirit, not like your clattergang ...
btw how are the nicer folks who try to avoid trouble, like tal for instance ? ~*~

17. Mai 2005, 21:44:25
ColonelCrockett 
Sujet: Re: errr
chessmec: IYT = itsyourturn.com

17. Mai 2005, 21:45:26
ColonelCrockett 
Sujet: Re: errr
danoschek: as I recall, you and I got along just fine . . . what do you mean by clattergang?

17. Mai 2005, 21:49:30
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: errr
modifié par danoschek (17. Mai 2005, 21:51:16)
ColonelCrockett: oh yes ... it was not me who mentioned any trouble - remember.
the sensible thing with some associations is they grow over a controllable size, we had
that here too: the KMs, after a while stats strike, there's always someone crossing lines ~*~

17. Mai 2005, 21:53:57
ColonelCrockett 
Sujet: Re: errr
danoschek: plz clarify this message, I'm not an expert in double-speak. :)

17. Mai 2005, 21:56:58
danoschek 
Sujet: oh okay
modifié par danoschek (17. Mai 2005, 21:57:42)
I cAn clarify: it was double-plus ...
conductor, a welcome suite for our new bk comrades please
............. ... ... ~*~

20. Mai 2005, 22:08:09
ColonelCrockett 
Sujet: prize tournaments
do the prize tournaments (where you play for "free membership" cost anything?

20. Mai 2005, 22:11:02
Chessmaster1000 
Sujet: Re: prize tournaments
ColonelCrockett:
30 Euro if you win.........

21. Mai 2005, 12:00:08
Chessmaster1000 
Hey! Just kidding, i'm not a fool that paid these money..........

(I received a mail saying i'm an idiot that paid 30 Euro, because when you win you pay nothing and since free membership cost less than 30 Euro, what's the reason to participate if you are about to pay more than that you win? The person who sent it must not have a sense of humour or must be a complete idiot!----Sorry......)

21. Mai 2005, 21:00:45
ColonelCrockett 
Sujet: Re:
Chessmaster1000: can someone else verify this 30 Euro?

21. Mai 2005, 21:06:56
Chessmaster1000 
Just kidding as i said................
You don't have to pay anything.....!
Except if at the tournament notes there is a different statement. But that would be ridiculous and i haven't seen anything yet.......

21. Mai 2005, 21:17:16
ColonelCrockett 
Sujet: Re:
Chessmaster1000: so it is theoretically possible for someone to win membership (without having ever been a member before)?

21. Mai 2005, 21:19:54
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: Re:
ColonelCrockett: yes it is ... ~*~

21. Mai 2005, 21:21:49
ColonelCrockett 
Sujet: Re: Re:
danoschek: good, I'm already fighting feelings of inadequacy looking at all these rooks and knights (and comparing that with my lowly pawn) LOL

21. Mai 2005, 21:33:10
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: Re:
ColonelCrockett: you go uhhmm - candidate ... ... ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 16:08:50
pauloaguia 
Sujet: Re: Re:
ColonelCrockett: If you take a look there's more of us pawns then there is of them ;) So no need to feel "inadequate".

Good luck for your prized tournament

22. Mai 2005, 20:32:01
ughaibu 
I'm going to post a thematic chess tournament, winners will be those to first double rooks on the 7th, no draws. The tournament'll be entitled "blind pigs" and'll be co-dedicated to the global moderators and the cloak facility.

22. Mai 2005, 20:56:31
danoschek 
Sujet: to all serious players
modifié par danoschek (22. Mai 2005, 21:09:32)
since on features request a self-appointed "preselector"-bully disgruntles all useful
suggestions, we could need some more sincer votes who clearly state their opinion
against notorious, perpetual-draw-offer spammers supposed to be encouraged there ... ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 21:24:41
votacommunista 
Sujet: Re: to all serious players
danoschek: Maybe some people do not understand that perpetual-draw-offers are for chessplayers not only unsportsmenlike ... against the whole game.
i think the experienced chess players here know the worth of a draw-offer, often done as a leading question, but never perpetual.
altough we are playing here "virtual" draw offers are useful for psychological playing here too ... as I said: I do not like draw spammers (some from the first move in the game!)

22. Mai 2005, 21:28:43
ughaibu 
How about deducting 50BK for each draw offer?

22. Mai 2005, 21:31:00
danoschek 
Sujet: Re:
ughaibu: it would be sufficient to make the
privilege of offering draw alternating between the players. ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 21:32:56
votacommunista 
Sujet: Re: Re:
danoschek: that is worth to look at ... draw offering privileg alternating between the players, but what about a simple draw offer privilege only two moves after then you offered a draw?

22. Mai 2005, 21:34:15
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: Re:
chessmec: not a bad idea either ... I would suggest TEN moves distance though. ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 21:37:52
votacommunista 
Sujet: Re: Re:
danoschek: in my opinion 10 moves are too long - maybe 3-5 is worth to look at ...

22. Mai 2005, 21:40:07
ughaibu 
Generally it's bad manners to offer a draw in an inferior position, in effect this means that if a draw offer is refused the opponent thinks that their position is better, ie no consecutive draw offers by either player.

22. Mai 2005, 21:51:38
votacommunista 
Sujet: Re:
ughaibu: when i offer a draw, then it i do it because
a) i mean the position is in my opinion equal and
a1) the tournament can be done with the draw (depends on my rank)
a2) i am playing against a strong player and it is such as a "leading question" ... just to know a little bit more what the opponent want ;-)
b) i am in a better position bt in the tournament/match this is enough

22. Mai 2005, 21:58:03
votacommunista 
Sujet: Re:
ughaibu: The game Trice-Alex does not affect that what I wrote when I offer a draw.
Well, in the game Trice-Alex a draw offer all three moves wuould be strange enough, yes ... but this can not be prohibited in my opinion. draw offer every move should be only prohibited.
but maybe worth to look at: a checkbox such as "i do not accept draw offers" ...

22. Mai 2005, 22:00:11
ughaibu 
Okay. Chess players have to suffer draws in any case.

22. Mai 2005, 22:10:02
Alex 
Sujet: ughaibu
Do you think, game between me and EdTrice will be draw?

22. Mai 2005, 22:20:04
ughaibu 
Sujet: Alex
Which one?

22. Mai 2005, 22:25:40
Alex 
Sujet: Re: Alex
ughaibu: Muzio gambit 49 move.

22. Mai 2005, 22:44:39
danoschek 
Sujet: Re:
ughaibu: no I won't comment - the game is still in progress.
as we know only pertinent cheaters would offer their services at analysis
during a running game to sabotate serious players on gameservers ... ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 22:48:00
Alex 
I´m not understand why nobody no comment this game?

22. Mai 2005, 22:49:26
ughaibu 
Sujet: Alex
I am a part of this game playing community as are you and Trice, our behaviour reflects upon each other.

22. Mai 2005, 22:57:06
Alex 
Good, but tell me.I have chance to win?

22. Mai 2005, 22:57:37
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: why no comment
modifié par danoschek (22. Mai 2005, 23:03:50)
Alex: well I repeat it slowly for you:
no I won't comment - the game is still in progress and only cheaters or less serious
players would interfer now apart of technical statements. - As soon as you have won
. ~*~ . it though, respectively were bored to death by that staller/spammer, I shall have my say.

22. Mai 2005, 22:59:17
votacommunista 
Sujet: Re:
Alex: nobody will tell it you ... you will have to check it out yourself ... come on! or is it too difficult? ;-)

22. Mai 2005, 23:04:11
Alex 
But it´s no my lapse!

22. Mai 2005, 23:05:18
ughaibu 
Sujet: Alex
Why not resign the game?

22. Mai 2005, 23:10:18
Alex 
I not understand. This is joke?

22. Mai 2005, 23:15:06
danoschek 
Sujet: Re: Alex:
modifié par danoschek (22. Mai 2005, 23:16:00)
if some of the really pity occurances here would
be marked as joke after all, many of their naturally
misleading self-defintions could indeed be funny yet. ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 23:15:21
ughaibu 
The game with Trice? Of course it's a joke. I'm publishing that game at http://www.chessgames.com/index.html do as you like.

22. Mai 2005, 23:23:47
Kili 
modifié par Kili (22. Mai 2005, 23:28:53)
I bet you a coffe that Alex will win this game against Ed Trice :)

22. Mai 2005, 23:27:35
ughaibu 
Sujet: Matarilevich
But will I still be married by the time that game finishes?

22. Mai 2005, 23:31:18
danoschek 
Sujet: Re ughaibu:
modifié par danoschek (22. Mai 2005, 23:33:19)
last time he prevailed as we know ... his lost game vs caissus vanished under
mysterious circumstances not only from the backup after a server crash, but also
from the why so bad memory of that hopelessly busted representant of infidelity ... ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 23:31:56
Kili 
I suppose he is already married.

22. Mai 2005, 23:45:25
Alex 
Sujet: Re:
ughaibu: I can´t find this game.

22. Mai 2005, 23:55:36
ughaibu 
Sujet: Alex
Go here http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=82147 scroll down and you'll find a link to your game.

<< <   8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17   > >>
Date et heure
Amis en ligne
Forums favoris
Associations
Astuce du jour
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, tous droits réservés
Retour en haut