Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.
If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).
Přetvořeny oževatelem The Listener (25. ledna 2005, 10:21:47)
Nightstorm: If Fencer chooses to run his website with any rules he wishes to create,
that is fine.
However, he should not state that the boards are in ANY way 'PUBLIC' -- Otherwise, that can be construed as False Advertising and Fraud.
It's NOBODY'S business who paid for my Membership, but me.
Secondly, the REAL issue it seems to be on this website is not necessarily the 'lyric thing', but moreover a larger issue -- Public vs. Private -- Suuurrre, anyone can post anything they want in a Private fellowship board. However, when it comes to Public boards, certainly Public Law has to come into play. The American Copyright Law is pretty much the World-standard, is it not?
If someone would like to argue that, I'd like to ask, what is the alternative to the US Library of Congress Copyright Office Laws?
And if we agree that this is a non-issue, then why all the hub-bub? Why can't people just enjoy the Public Boards without being harassed and censored when they do not 'spam', 'bait' or 'flame'?
O čem je toďten plk: Re: When Will There Be Fair Use ?
Fencer:
I'm 'enery the Eighth, I am
'enery the Eighth I am, I am
I got married to the widow next door
She's been married seven times before
And every time it was an 'enery, 'enery!...
I'm not what you think I am. And if it be your pleasure to silence me, so be it. However, you cannot destroy Civil Rights, Freedom and Democracy with an edict.
Přetvořeny oževatelem The Listener (25. ledna 2005, 08:43:53)
Hey Pawns,
Do you want to spend your money on this?...
Paying Membership to this site is not a good idea because:
The people who run this place (BrainKing.com) violate their own rules, i.e. They will harass you, censor you by deleting/hiding your posts, 'bait' you into arguments, and more or less commit transgressions of all sorts.
Also, there has recently been a controversy about posting your favorite song lyrics. The US Copyright Law states that it IS Legal to post lyrics/poems/jokes/stories on discussion boards -- If it is for non-profit and educational purposes only.
The User Agreement doesn't even mention this lyric posting 'rule'. But for some odd reason, some people on this website appoint themselves as 'Judge-Jury-God', and continue to inflict Arbitrary Aristocratic Censorship upon anyone who disagrees with them.
And even if you're a paying member, you'd better get used to this kind of treatment.
So, make sure to consider all of this before you spend your hard-earned bucks here, and watch out...
The Agenda should be 'Fair Use'. And if the so-called owner of this website chooses to ignore the 'Public' law, they should state it up front for ALL to see. To that, I whole-heartedly agree. (At the risk of rhyming )
When they publically state their intention of making this a 'Privately Owned', and therefore, a 'Privately Dictatorial' website -- Then I shall tell everyone to enjoy it as is.
O čem je toďten plk:Regarding The New BBW BK Rules
Přetvořeny oževatelem The Listener (16. lestopado 2004, 10:49:53)
Just a minor note --
Before 'officializing' these new BK guidelines, it would be ideal to check for spelling errors and/or 'typos'. There are many currently present according to the data amassed.
If you want to take away the things the Pawns already have, then why not scrap the whole thing? It's pointless to force someone to do something they don't want to do.
The reason I say 'scrap the whole thing' is because that would be the ultimate fate of it anyway. The Rich would win, everyone would be happy, and all of us who are here just to have fun will be gone.
Paying members can add a picture to their profile, which appears when they post. My question is, why does IMupChucKing put a picture of former President Bill Clinton, when he is not Bill Clinton?
Thanx Bernice -- I would, but I'm happy enough with the little things in life, I possess no need to belong to anything or climb to the top of a browny hill and scream at the farmland below ~ until next...
quadrastoople :·P ... I know it's discrimination, Stevie, but have you noticed any traitorous cretins walking about with your name? Seems to me there was a post a lil while back that only a complete and total smeghead would write... Hmmmm