Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
All I can say is that if Henry Kissinger deserved the Nobel Peace Prize, then Obama for sure deserves it too. At some point Ronald Reagan was nominated. I am sure he deserved one too. After all, the Nobel Prizes are as much about politics and reputation as they are about achievement.
Übergeek 바둑이: From what I read it seems that the Nobel panel were glad the USA have under Obama regained some sanity, and for a change .. admitted mistakes were made by the USA.
... A rogue USA is just as frightening as any rogue nuclear power. That Blair lied to stop the USA going alone speaks of the perceived consequence of such a problem.
Übergeek 바둑이: One ought to truly be deserving of the Prize. Obama hasn't done anything of any significance. He hasn't been on the scene long enough for that. It's a joke that he won. For what??? There is nothing.