Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
(V): so what your saying after watching a thirty second video you know every single thing that happened you know everything that was said from this thirty sec clip you say that this officer must be put on trial because the video tells you so
what i keep saying why are you so quick to JUDGE you dont all the facts from a 30 sec clip just wait and see what ELSE COMES OUT before jumping to conclusions
did you google that last one to find out the laws of the land
(V): has i said if you say so thou i rather wait until everything is out in the open before making a judgement myself i found over the years its to easy to JUDGE someone without knowing all the FACTS
(V): and the KEYWORD in your last statement is IF so has i keep saying lets wait and see what emerges this is going to go on for along time so why not wait and see what the next post mortem says
i agree with you on one point thou the BOSSES of the police on the ground really needs to be investigated
because i would not like to be herded into a small space and be denied basic rights food water etc that part of the operation was a real disgrace
(V): and has I SAID youve no idea what was SAID seconds before he was pushed so obviously he couldnt of been arrested and has everyone knows theres always 2 sides to every story so isnt it better to have the policemans version to before passing JUDGEMENT
(V): we only have this small clip of film we dont know if anything was said from this guy or police we will have to wait for this to come out im not condoning the police in any way so surely its best to wait until all the facts are out than to judge the guy or the police
bottom line you dont know anymore than 99.99% of the rest of the UK you WERNT THERE your only going on what the TV and newpapers are telling you and we all know those are well hyped up to sell or gain viewers
(V): the lowest age risk is a couple of years after your sexual active and that is not in your twenties when they do go for smears the labs bin them when they see the age on them
New guidelines suggest that women should have their first Pap smear by the age of 21 or within 3 years of first sexual intercourse. Women need to continue to have yearly gyn exams to look for any abnormalities or STDs, as well.
Bernice: you are right any lady under the age of 25 can walk in and demand she should have a smear test but having the age limit lowered would save a lot of fear alot of why they wont lower the age is to do with the cost but in the long run surely if lowering the age limit to 20 where your send a reminder every 3 years saved one life then its a must for the ppl of the UK
alot of countries actually test woman every year we are so far behind with 25 years and only getting screened every 3 years every 5 years after the age of 50
Bernice: yes sadly we still behind most countries with our age for screening starting at 25 the reason i asked V if it had changed has i thought i had missed it
this story springs to mind everytime i hear about it
(V): i was just amazed to read that doctors surgeons and blood travel with him
the fact that MP,s have claimed way over the top has been going on for years i remember the last recession when the PM was calling for wage restraint and they voted themselves a wage increase way above anything normal ppl where allowed
dosnt matter which party you support they all out for themselves
its really stupid that one or the other was not kept to have 2 systems on the go at the same time is has i say very confusing i remember the outrage before dedecimalization in the early seventies but ppl soon got use to the change so why have 2 systems on weights and measures older ppl l;ike myself who wernt taught anything metric would of adapted to it just like the ones did who were opposed to dedecimalization
Czuch: i know they teach the metric weight and things in our schools now ive no idea what they on about, every food item must display the weight in metric but its upto the stall holder or the shop whether or not they display it in the imperial measures
its actually very confusing while the young only know the metric weights and measures sadly us oldies only know the old system but i guess in 50 years time or less it will be gone for good
Artful Dodger: yes that was done in 1992 i beleive she will of course be grown up now properly have children of her own and has the world listened NO WAY were still selfish we still break things we cant fix we still have children having to beg for the right to survive we still polute the water ways
HAVE THE GOVERMENTS OF OUR NATIONS DONE ANYTHING IN THE 17 YEARS SINCE THAT SPEECH WAS MADE
(V): it doesn't alter the fact that some patients don't get the treatment they need because of there postcodes if there health care trust doesn't have enough money to fund there course of treatment they don't get it and many of these cancer patients have WORKED all there working lives and they cant get the treatment they need which brings me on to another subject close to my heart
free exchange needles for drug addicts if drug addicts can get free needles why do ppl on insulin have to pay for there's
there's something really wrong in a society where ppl who are ill thou no fault of there own have to buy the needles to inject something to save there lives while the dregs of society can walk into any hospital or clinic and exchange there's for nothing
if this is the great NHS you are on about in my eyes and many thousands of others its a joke
(V): oh that must be why im still waiting after 20 months to have a small bone removed from my inside my nose so i can breathe properly Has you well know Jules most of the NHS is based on a postcode lottery if you dont live in a area that has that kind of treatment you dont get it
we still have patients dying on trolleys in corridors you still have to wait years for even minor operations nurses and doctors work VERY LONG HOURS 80 hrs a week some doctors work for very lil pay
The Usurper: please can you break your post up its very annoying when wanting to go to another board and having to scroll down half a mile to get there
Artful Dodger: ive just seen where the same doctor is in the spotlight again over a 49 year old woman who is now having quads the link i was going to use wouldnt show up on here
Pedro Martínez: according to tv reports here both children have had social services intervening and they say that neither will face any charge but they will help with advice on bringing the child up
which dosnt gave out a very good message to other kids
Bernice: is this the lad and lass from the UK from i gather the only help they get will be child benift but the grandmother has to claim that has the child cant has she to young
"GERRY": im a smoker who is trying to quit and i agree with the others when you walk past someone and get a nose full of there smoke makes it very hard not to light one up yourself
件名: Re: The hard news at Fox is NOT biased and you can't provide even ONE example that it is. OTOH, I have provided examples of other HARD news outlets showing blatant bias.
(V): does the Sun every print anything thats true?