Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.
HUH? I know you are just trying to bait me again, so I'll try to make this my last post.
Please read below - you and others posted many times about how some tournaments are held up by one player who is playing (within the rules), yet playing too slow for your liking. You don't like to play these people, correct?
Why would it be more taxing on the servers? Well right now the site servers are being taxed to their fullist, and to start making a calculation after every move for every players, and do those calculations against the last time played, how much time is left, and how long the time limit is left for every players on every move - well I have been a system administrator for over 6 years, so I yes - i'm just "guessing" that all those extra calculations would tax the server even more. So maybe Fencer has some "special" server that I've never heard of which could handle all those extra calculations without taxing the servers anymore, and if so - I appoligize. (Even though i don't think Fencer has any magical servers - that is just my opinion)
The calculation for the BKR's do tax the servers a little, but those only happen at the end of every game, so that would be a lot less then after every turn of every game! (again, just my guessing using simple math).
I am not a system administrator, are you trying to belittle me? ;)~
This system already keeps track of when the last time to move in a game is, and it already keeps track of when a move is made, so those are not extra calculations, therefore not more taxing on the servers, If you read my suggestion below, you will see I merly advocated for a weekly calculation for this rating. I disagree that using the server capacity as a reason for not using this rating is invalid. nd since you have given no legitimate reason for being against it. I will presume that you don't have any other objections.
As far as the list goes, I guess you don't have a logical explaination for your stating that it would somehow be a negative thing to be on this list, since it is perfectly legitimate to play this way, why would a list recognizing this be negative?
I think there are rules, and there are a spirit of the rules. The rules state that you have x amount of time to move, period. The vast majority of people play consistently much faster than the rules allow. You know it and I know it... thats why you think it is negative to be on a list of these players, and thats why you agree with me, but you just won't let yourself admit it. Otherwise defend your stance on the list of slow players making someone feel bad...