Spelersnaam: Wachtwoord:
Registratie voor nieuwe spelers
Toezichthouder: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Berichten per pagina:
Forumlijst
U hebt geen toestemming om berichten op dit forum achter te laten. Het minimaal vereiste lidmaatschap om berichten op dit forum achter te mogen laten is Brain Paard.
Modus: Iedereen kan berichten achterlaten
Zoek in berichten:  

<< <   347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356   > >>
2. maart 2006, 06:06:37
coan.net 
Onderwerp: Re: Februrary "action"
rod03801: Well actually the Paid Membership page will only show you new memberships, and not any renewals of current members, so it is only goot at counting new members (or at least from pawn to knight/rook memberships)

2. maart 2006, 03:18:40
anastasia 
Onderwerp: Re:
Goonerg: did you really??!!?? lucky person you are!!

2. maart 2006, 02:28:28
Goonerg 
I got a 50% bonus.

2. maart 2006, 01:47:26
rod03801 
Onderwerp: Februrary "action"
Aangepast door rod03801 (2. maart 2006, 01:49:01)
I am curious what the stats are for the membership "action" for February. It would be interesting to know how many memberships were bought (information I know I can find by going to the "Paid Membersip" page) and how many of those got the random 50% added to what they bought.

1. maart 2006, 22:49:02
skipinnz 
Onderwerp: Re:
ScarletRose: very clever

1. maart 2006, 21:41:45
ScarletRose 

28. februari 2006, 22:49:41
furbster 
Onderwerp: Re: team/fellowship ratings/rankings
Hrqls: I think it's a great idea too.

28. februari 2006, 20:42:37
anastasia 
Onderwerp: Re: team/fellowship ratings/rankings
wekke: yes please...AWESOME idea!!!

28. februari 2006, 20:38:58
wekke 
Onderwerp: Re: team/fellowship ratings/rankings
Hrqls: I 2nd that idea.

28. februari 2006, 20:17:56
Hrqls 
Onderwerp: team/fellowship ratings/rankings
are there any fellowship or team ratings or rankings ?

now there will be a lot more team tournaments/challenges it might be nice to view which team/fellowship ranks where in each game type :)

28. februari 2006, 19:09:39
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Fellowship team membership question
shagglbrox: The games will remain as they are, it won't affect them.

28. februari 2006, 19:04:55
shagglbrox 
Onderwerp: Re: Fellowship team membership question
Fencer: The team I'm on is in a team tournament. The team I want to join will be doing a team match.

28. februari 2006, 18:53:31
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Fellowship team membership question
shagglbrox: Do you mean a normal tournament, a team tournament or a team match?

28. februari 2006, 18:52:08
shagglbrox 
Onderwerp: Fellowship team membership question
If I'm on a team for a fellowship involved in a tournament currently, and I want to leave the team to join the same game type team of another fellowship, what happens to any current games in my first fellowship's tourney?

27. februari 2006, 06:36:35
WhisperzQ 
Onderwerp: To add some balance ...
There is a lot of discussion wanting to "do away with" auto-vacation, some component of the weekends and even possibly predetermined vacation days.

Firstly, I am pleased to hear Fencer will be revising at least some of these. One of my gripes is that auto-vacation days (and at times vacation days) are not actually vacations, they are just "non-time-out" days. A vavcation day, I beleive, should step EVERY game back 24 hours, not just delay the ones which were going to time out to not time out till the next day. All the present system does is give you twice as many games to catch up on the next day, hardly a vacation.

Secondly, I try not to use auto-vacation days but there are times when I simply cannot get on for some periods of time because I have work to do or like BBW am not near a computer which is quick enough to play many games - try playing Jarmo on dialup!. When these days occur I get online if I can and play a few games, but am not able to play them all, and yes i am selective about the games I play and don't alwyas make the decision on whether that particular game will time out - there are many deciding factors in which games I play, time left is only one. Play less games you say ... well I play the amount of games I am comfortable with for 95% of the time and rely on auto-vacation for the other times.

Thirdly, also as said before ... only play in the games you are comfortable with. I do not play any 1 or 2 day games. I do not play any fischer clock games. I do not play any fixed weekend games (except where I missed it when signing up). I have adapted to what suits my style of playing, I think you all need to do the same. Because I don't play particular styles of play I do not call for the whole site to change to suit me, so please do not reply in kind.

Elsewhere Fencer has (recently) stated that this site offers many options ... use them if you want, or not.

And lastly a poignant offering ... I notice that two of the protagonists for doing away with autovacation still have their own autovacation set to on .... is this a double standard or just and oversight?

26. februari 2006, 23:55:14
playBunny 
furbster: I've been wondering about that ever since, lol. I wonder what the details of the change are..

Fencer How come you didn't announce the Knight tournament allocation change in News? Seems to me it's the removal of a major restriction. Surely all Knights would welcome hearing that?

26. februari 2006, 23:47:48
furbster 
Yeh i don't think Fencer has updated the paid membership bit where it says you can only joing one tourney of the same type. Only reason i had an inkling it had changed was that i saw some subtle remark on one of teh discussion boards a week or two ago. At least you know now

26. februari 2006, 23:33:45
furbster 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacations
Aangepast door furbster (26. februari 2006, 23:37:55)
emmett: Not sure if this is correct, try signing up for a tourney where u already have one running in. Eg. try joining anotehr loop chess tourney

26. februari 2006, 23:28:15
alanback 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacations
Marfitalu: I do understand what tenuki is talking about, and I meant no disrespect for his opinions. There have been times when I have noted players who seemed to be manipulating the time rules. I find this more amusing than frustrating. As anyone who watches professional sports of any kind must realize, once a rule is adopted there is always the potential for it to be followed in a way that does not comport with what one supposes the intention of the rule to be.

As a lawyer, I am willing to argue to a court that a law is being applied in a way that thwarts its intention. In the USA, courts are often sypathetic to such arguments; in other countries, I believe courts tend to apply the laws as they are written and leave it to the rulemakers to change them if their intention is not being carried out.

Also as a lawyer, I know that any written rule is subject to being abused. Changing from one rule to another does not eliminate the potential for abuse, it simply changes the nature of that potential. As a game player, I tend to take a relaxed attitude towards this. Let those who find amusement in applying rules in ways they were never intended to be applied, do so; I can avoid those players when I recognize them.

And of course, let those who find amusement in arguing about what the rules should be, do so also!

26. februari 2006, 22:54:25
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacations
alanback: So, you think that, even when there is a known bug who is used by...let call them not-very-sportmen-players, Automatic Vacations should be still in use and not wait until it to be fixed? Play at the pace you want, no problem, but PLAY! I understand you won´t like to do as a player (we all know who he is) who doesn´t make a single move during one month in 1300 games...are you defending him? I´m not attacking YOU...:-)

26. februari 2006, 22:20:35
goodbyebking 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacations
tenuki: I think we should allow one weekend day instead of two.

26. februari 2006, 22:11:15
alanback 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacations
Aangepast door alanback (26. februari 2006, 22:13:27)
tenuki: Perhaps you are mistken about the site you are on. This site is as it is, and what it is is defined by its rules. One of those rules is the automatic vacation.

Can someone explain to me why it is so important for moves to be made within a particular time frame? I thought games were played for relaxation!

As for me, I come to the site, I make whatever moves are available, and I get on with the rest of my life.

If making moves constantly is very important to you, then I believe you are certainly playing on the wrong site; you should go to a site where games are played in real time.

Moreover, and I think this has been pointed out before, it is possible to create and play games here in which vacation days are not allowed. Anyone who is concerned about the use of vacation days should avoid games and tournaments that allow them.

26. februari 2006, 21:37:29
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Automatic Vacations
Dear friends: I think we´re missing the point here...I wasn´t talking about those who use Automatic Vacations when you need it, but to prevent all those (non-)players who use it ONLY to annoy opponents, win undeserved games due to their opponents boredom, disrupt stairs functioning, and many crimes more...I think there should be a rule against them! not against decent players. Is it ok to have 1300 games and take advantage of a known bug to not make a SINGLE MOVE during one month???? If all those who defend the automatic vacation think it´s ok, then I think they are in the wrong site, maybe a chat site instead of a PLAYING site would be better for them.

26. februari 2006, 20:51:31
Universal Eyes 
Onderwerp: Re:
Bry:Agree as well as but you forgot about the no days off rule.

26. februari 2006, 20:14:22
coan.net 
Onderwerp: Re:
Bry: Well I would hate to see a rule in place where if I'm between the choices of (1) Login on and getting a little caught up or (2) don't log on at all and get further behind - I would hate to see a rule which forces option 2 of people.

having said that, if something was put into place, I have plenty of other sites I can visit during those times - but would hate to be forced to do that.

26. februari 2006, 19:26:51
Bry 
Onderwerp: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Totally agree. A vacation day should only "kick" in when you have not been online that day....

I apprecite BBW's point..... but if you cannot guarantee to be on every day.... u shouldn't enter 1 day tournaments.....

26. februari 2006, 16:14:27
Czuch 
Onderwerp: Re:
Stevie: I agree 100%! If you can find time to come on this site you should not have the luxury of auto vacation. Maybe in BBWs example, he could just set a vacation for that day. But this is first and foremest a game playing site, and he should make his first priority making moves in a game, not checking messages. It gets infuriating when people start more games than they can keep up with, and they will be here for hours and only play on the discussion boards and fellowships when hey have games ready to time out. But I guess people can use their vacation days anyway they choose to, and we do have the option of only playing in games that dont allow vacations, so we wont have to worry about people like that!

25. februari 2006, 18:58:54
Maxxina 
Aangepast door Maxxina (26. februari 2006, 07:35:16)
Or reduce moving weekend days one time per month .

25. februari 2006, 16:42:50
goodbyebking 
Onderwerp: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: We should have vacation days. Maybe we should get rid of weekend days, or reduce the weekend days to one day instead. Or we could count weekend days that are actually used against timeouts as a vacation day used...

25. februari 2006, 16:19:14
coan.net 
Onderwerp: Re:
Stevie: I would hate to see a restriction of not being able to use vacation days if someone is on-line. I know for example when I go on vacation to my sister-in-law's house, all they have is a VERY slow dial up connection available from their house - in which I get board there and do get on-line, and try to come here to check messages and such - but would almost be impossible for me to keep up with my games, hence a vacation day. if a restriction like that is put into place, it would stop me from even being able to check in and at least stay caught up with my messages.

25. februari 2006, 11:02:18
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
Stevie: And why do you think they take such a hard work if they wouldn´t know they have unsporting advantage? They can win games and even tournaments witout knowing the game at all, just making their opponents leave the site in boredom (specially newcomers -Pawns, who have limited spots for games-) and drop their games.

25. februari 2006, 10:54:17
Stevie 
I still reckon if someone has been online during a certain day, then later in the same day,, they should not be saved by auto vacation.. that is really annoying

25. februari 2006, 10:36:49
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Re:
Fencer: Yes! And if you need some ideas, just count on us, we´re ready to help you making this one the best site on the net!!!

25. februari 2006, 10:33:42
Fencer 
The vacation system needs to be rewritten a little anyway.

25. februari 2006, 10:32:10
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
Walter Montego: Another good point, my friend. By the way, as emmet has reportedd there´s a bug somewhere as I have a player timing out 9 games a day everyday since a month ago, and he has still 19 vacation days left, unchanged for past 4 days...and you know...whenever unsporting players detecct a bug they will exploit it to gain more and more advantage (by the way that player has 1268 games running, how many stairs is he blocking?)

25. februari 2006, 08:48:14
SMIRF Engine 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
Walter Montego: One should have to decide to be on vacation or not. A day, during which one makes a move in any game, never could be a vacation day. I feel frustrated, when opponents are playing other games, while mine would be delayed by automatic vacation.

25. februari 2006, 07:39:32
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
BIG BAD WOLF: Yes, I want to do it as you write.

25. februari 2006, 06:50:25
Walter Montego 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
tenuki: Also, I have some spots left if you'd like to get some side games going whlie waiting for the tournaments to start in April. :)

25. februari 2006, 06:45:55
Walter Montego 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
tenuki: J'yes, j'yes, a right mighty fine thing there, but just how in the hell will it be policed? Sure I've had a problem or two getting online, but I move lots more regularly than those that're holding up some tournaments I'm involved in. Yes, I know you're not complaining about me and when I make a move, but this is just an example. One thing to keep in mind about "Automatic Vacation" is the time of year. You know how people and human nature are. When there's a surplus, they figure they have plenty of days to move and don't worry about a day or two going off their list. Later in the year the games move or time out in ways the just don't happen in February. Just ask Pythagoras is you need conformation of this phenomenon. :) He's not necessarily been moving with alacrity of late, but he's not let weeks go by any more either. :)

25. februari 2006, 05:44:26
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
SG1fan: I´m not talking about you or all the people who really needs them from time to time, due to an accident or the like...I´m talking about those who use it with the only porpouse to delay games, bore people, win undeserved games, sink the site, etc... Perhaps could it be given ONLY on THESE special cases like yours, REAL vacations, you-name-it, etc and making it ¨not-so-automatic vacations¨?

25. februari 2006, 05:41:30
coan.net 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
tenuki: There are also many tournament options which do not use vacations, so those might also be a good choice to avoid people who take advantage of them.

It has been suggested, and I was thinking Fencer liked the idea of possible having a limit of 5 automatic vacation days being taken in one span. (A person going on vacation can choose more then 5 days, but would only stop the auto-vacations from being used for more then 5 days).

25. februari 2006, 05:35:56
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
playBunny: If superb wine is poisoned and kills, I would prefer water.

25. februari 2006, 05:35:05
mal4inara 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
tenuki: Well, I am thankful to have the automatic vacation feature. My hard-drive died a bit over a month ago, and I had very limited access to internet, an hour every few days. So only had time to play games I would time out in.

Having automatic vacation meant that the majority of my games didn't time-out, and I am busy catching up again, now I have a hard-drive again.

I agree some abuse the system, but others like me, genuinely need/needed to use the automatic vacation. I love playing here, and worked hard to get my ratings. I would not like to lose what I have gained, if no automatic vacation time.

Jo

25. februari 2006, 05:25:22
playBunny 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
tenuki: You'd have to propose the replacement scheme first. Don't throw away the wine if you haven't got the champagne yet. And make sure it's not cheap champagne replacing superb wine. ;-)

25. februari 2006, 05:24:35
goodbyebking 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
tenuki: Yes. Deactivate automatic vacation.
I just submitted a bug report on this situation, but it is probably a vacation issue. In a tournament with a five day per move limit, weekends off, my opponent has not moved in 13 days. With the weekend here, I'm sure I won't see a move for at least another two. It's too bad, because this involves a tournament, and in this situation a tournament could last over a year.

25. februari 2006, 05:24:00
alanback 
Onderwerp: Re: Automatic Vacation
tenuki: I use it, I don't abuse it, and I like it.

25. februari 2006, 05:20:45
tenuki 
Onderwerp: Automatic Vacation
Hey friends! What do you think about automatic vacations? Don´t you feel too many players use them to receive unsporting advantage (cheating?), and in that way tournaments last eons, Stairs are stopped and too many players (specially newcomers) are disappointed with the site and leave, making as all to lose a potential opponent and friend? Don´t you all think it should be deactivated? At least until a less nocive feature could be deviced and implemented...

24. februari 2006, 11:14:07
enimlingua 
Onderwerp: Re:
alanback: I agree, just wondering why you
don't appear taking that advice, on the backgammon
board for instance, which I use to watch because I am
interested in the game. Brainking is certainly a very
good bickering server, with moderators playing a major
role themselves. I wholeheartedly agree with Marfitalu,
told him in our games that I fear to get between the
bulldozers living out their importance here and decide
only in line with their favoritism.
What happened now that I dared, is not much better,
my question about playing here was simply buried. :-(

24. februari 2006, 11:12:59
Radiant2008 :-) 
Thank you guys... hmmmmmm Too bad!

24. februari 2006, 11:05:20
playBunny 
Onderwerp: Re: Fellowship BB Limit
Radiant Aunt: Aye, that'll be because there's a limit of two per person.

<< <   347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356   > >>
Datum en tijd
Aanwezige vrienden
Favoriete Forums
Genootschappen
Tip van de dag
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, alle rechten voorbehouden.
Terug naar boven