Fencer:
Ok, thanks. Guess we have to get use to.

What happened to the pontuation system? No I'm not talking about rating. If you see the date post its still 19 not yet 20 (Tuesday).
I'm refering that there are games that i call balanced ones which means I get points if I win no points add or remove if I draw and I loose the same amount of winning points if I loose (seems fair). Today when i checked those games again that I'm currently playing I see theres a unbalanced distribution I earn 3 points if i win, going to loose 5 points even if I draw!?!? and will loose 13 points If I loose the game (more than 4 times from if I win). And the BKR difference between me and my opponent its within 200 points. This happens in the past when it was a bigger diference like more than 400 points. Is this correct? Is this a new pontuation system?

Marfitalu:
No problem with that, but I guess only a very few players... (maybe Fencer) have 74 established BKR.

I like to suggest that the rating of the 50 best average ratings with 11 or more games types will be divided in categories. For me doesn't make any sense that a guy wirh just 11 game types like me for instances figures on the same chart to other guy that has 25 for example, its not comparable. I mean its so unfair for the player who plays more game types, that the chart doesn't mean nothing. How about having a chart by fixed number of game types. For instances started at 11 for all the players with at least 11 established rating games types (of course the 50 best). In this chart the average will only count the best 11 game types ratings for the player. Then the same for 12 and so on so on. We can then distinguish from newbie players from veteran ones.