Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Lista posturilor afişate
Nu eşti autorizat sã scrii pe acest panou.Pentru a putea adãuga mesaje trebuie sã ai nivelul de (0)
Warning: Can cause severe headaches and challenge long held preconceptions.
Simpletons are strongly advised to avoid reading this book. No Free Lunch not only contradicts randomly assembled interrelated complexity, but liberal ideology as well. Be vigilantly intolerant of anything that appears to make sense and cause you to think... because thinking is overrated, and it may lead to cancer.
Bwild: the bible is a very consistent book and remember, the fragments and copies we have aren't "translations". Besides, a lot of consideration is taken to get at the contextual meaning. Still it's not perfect but overall the translations are good. Some better than others. Personally I use several versions but also do word studies.
Artful Dodger: My dad is waiting until he turns 90 before having another birthday party. He's almost there. After that he wants to wait another decade before having another birthday party. I know the feeling, one birthday party after another after another... all that partying is exhausting, it can poop a guy out real quick. I'm not even close to 70 yet, and I know what he means.
Artful Dodger: [ Iamon lyme: root beer but also have gas. Not sure where that came from but likely the politics board ]
Oh yeah, this is the politics board. I should say something political. Ummm... the debates will start soon, sometime early in October. In other news, another long running debate is still going strong.
Artful Dodger: Ahhhhhh, okay! That makes sense! I had hot dogs and mashed potatos for dinner, but I couldn't understand where the pizza after taste was coming from.
Something else, tastes like Dr Pibb or Dr Pepper... it tastes like rotten cherries. Did you have a diet cola?
Iamon lyme: I just got back from eating pizza at our favorite pizza joint and see that you've posted three times while I was gone. Interesting. While I was gone. Now I know for sure I'm not you because I was not online during that same period! Whew! And here I was worried
- In 2011, the Romneys paid $1,935,708 in taxes on $13,696,951 in mostly investment income.
- The Romneys’ effective tax rate for 2011 was 14.1%.
-The Romneys donated $4,020,772 to charity in 2011, amounting to nearly 30% of their income.
-The Romneys claimed a deduction for $2.25 million of those charitable contributions. The Romneys’ generous charitable donations in 2011 would have significantly reduced their tax obligation for the year. The Romneys thus limited their deduction of charitable contributions to conform to the Governor's statement in August, based upon the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13% in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.
Subiectul: Re: There are fakers out there ready to take advantage of anyone, no matter who they are or what they believe. I don't assume everyone who calls himself "Christian" is who they say they are.
(V): [ You've decided your able to say who is and who isn't a Christian!!! ]
Where do I say that? You are playing with straw man dolls again. Man up, and play with real people for a change.
[ "True Christians are the first to regulate themselves, and to call fakers what they are." Isn't that what I'm doing? ]
No. Do you not know what you are doing? You said:
[ I just see the way they are doing it and understand that a good percentage of the money will never reach any 'causes'.. but will be spent on 'admin' costs. ]
[ It's all they want your money. They are even starting to use Glenn Beck style educating.. just a few pens and a white board though. With lovely scenes of Flames/Jerusalem/the cross all to show they are genuine ]
[ It's based on past events. It's also based on knowledge of certain charities in the past caught paying themselves a high wage. ]
You are saying (or implying) frauds and rip offs are the rule. I'm saying they are the exception. In what universe or parallel dimension is that saying the same thing?
So let's try this again...
[ "True Christians are the first to regulate themselves, and to call fakers what they are."
Isn't that what I'm doing? ]
Nope, sorry... the answer is still no.
Then you respond to something I say that answers your response before you responded...
[ "I'm not above using cliches. They have their purpose, but all the time and for every occasion? Are you kidding me?"
Then why do you and Art keep on using the same tired ones on liberals, etc all the time? ]
Because we are responding according to your own method of debate. Duh!
Is it unethical (or illegal) to do as you do? Is it do unto others better than they do unto you unless it is you who are doing the doing unto?
(ascunde) Te oboseşte să tot faci click pentru a ajunge la pagina dorită?Membrii plătitori şi-o pot adăuga la Meniul Contextual. (pauloaguia) (arată toate sfaturile)