Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Yes. The fundamental principles of legal certainty and prohibition of retroactivity is something I am not willing to give up on.
If I was a lawyer, and you had me classified as POW, I would argue that you had me classified wrongly, and argue for their release.... if you had me classified as a "common criminal" I would argue against thatas well, for their release!!
Its really a no win situation... except if they dont get a lawyer as POW.... but like you said, then they cant torture them!!!! ;)
I guess we basically have to agree that what we disagree on if it is okay to make a new classification or not.... we are arguing yes, you say no, simple as that.
(ascunde) Dacă te uiţi pe o tablă de discuţii regulat poţi să o adaugi la tabelele de discuţii preferate mergând la tabela de discuţii dorită şi făcând click pe "Adaugă la tabelel mele preferate". (pauloaguia) (arată toate sfaturile)