 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Nu eşti autorizat sã scrii pe acest panou.Pentru a putea adãuga mesaje trebuie sã ai nivelul de (0) Mod: Toatã lumea poate afişa
2. Martie 2009, 06:45:16 By the way,, any theories or opinions on the bombing of the fed building in OK?? you know the one that got blamed on poor Tim McVeigh and that other guy Nichols?? 2. Martie 2009, 06:47:09 Subiectul: Re: Oklahoma City Charles Martel: Also an inside job, under the Clinton administration. Practice run for 9/11, and more importantly at the time, a way to put militia movements in a bad light. 2. Martie 2009, 06:48:49 Subiectul: Re: Oklahoma City The Usurper: well i agree on the militia part.. especially the Ruby Ridge incident 2. Martie 2009, 06:52:26 Subiectul: Re: Oklahoma City Charles Martel: Yes, Ruby Ridge is another major incident in the rise of the American police state. Waco is another. My difference with liberals is this: they refuse to recognize the mal-intent of their Democratic leaders, while often recognizing it in Republican leaders. And my difference with conservatives is the same: they see the evil of Clinton, but not Bush, etc. 2. Martie 2009, 15:20:44 Subiectul: Re: Oklahoma City The Usurper: And my difference with conservatives is the same: they see the evil of Clinton, but not Bush, etc. Problem with this statement, is it isnt accurate... the part about liberals and Bush is true, all liberals could talk about is how evil Bush was, but never anything on a substantive basis..... But as far as conservatives and Clinton, aside from the part where he lied about an affair with an intern, conservatives simply disagreed with his policies and ideas, it was never about "he is evil and bad blah blah blah..." Same for Bam.... we simply disagree with his and other liberals "collective" agenda, he is not stupid or evil, he is just misguided and wrong.  |
Data şi ora
Prieteni în direct
Jocurile favorite
Frãţiile
Ştirea zilei
|
|
Drept de copiere © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, toate drepturile rezervate. Înapoi la Început de paginã |