I better play against a human with computer as against a human accusing me to be a cheater if I win. I second Purple argument, do not miss respect to your opponent.
If you want to avoid cheaters, try to play some exotic variants like parachute checkers or anti-checkers, there are surely very few efficient program there!
Or try to play with some opponents you trust and who trust you and add the cheaters to your blocked users list
sobek: I am totally agreing and this very certain that computer is a problem in "offline" site. This is also the main reason why I hardly ever play chess, unless I know my opponent in real life and trust him.
On the other hand, it is hopeless to get rid of computer assisted opponent. You can write code of conducts, etc...
An opponent playing only the computer moves would be bored quite quickly. However, if you do "study" with a computer, it will be almost impossible to detect.
Also, I am sure that you use a computer to play here at least to make your move and talk on the forums ;-)
thanks sobek for not saying stupid you seems to be certain to know who is playing with computer and who is not, so probably you know how a computer is different. By the way, are you a human or a computer
Subiectul: If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them.
I have been quite surprised by this rule actually, in "french checkers", you must capture the most pawns possible. That is, if you have one move with one capture, and one move with two captures, you have to play the move with two captures.
(ascunde) Dacă cineva î-ti spue ceva intro limbă pe care nu o întelegi poţi cere ajutor Tabla de discuţii a Limbilor. (pauloaguia) (arată toate sfaturile)