 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Вам не разрешено писать сообщения на этом форуме. Минимальный статус, требуемый для того, чтобы писать на этом форуме - Мозговая Пешка. Режим: Каждый может объявить
4. Января 2006, 13:02:58 Субъект: Re:  ColonelCrockett: just a collection of factoids about chess and its personages; ie an in-depth look at Tartakower, speculation on computers, composed games etc. 28. Декабря 2005, 12:35:20 One of the most entertaining books I've ever read on chess was "Karl Marx Plays Chess" by GM Andy Soltis. It probably won't make you a better player, but will you appreciate the game more. 9. Сентября 2005, 13:11:55 Субъект: Re: and let's not forget the greatest chessplayer of all time Grim Reaper: WOW. That'd be something. Age looks to have taken its toll on Fischer, but it wouldn't be missed in many circles. Have you ever personally corresponded with either one? 30. Августа 2005, 17:43:17 Субъект: Re: Great matches......... Chessmaster1000: Kasparov was the first champion who was entirely professional, both politically, preparation-wise and socially. The others were a bit quirky and did not present themselves well to the public at large. Kasparov's rock and roll blitx in 1987 at St. Johns with Short was a great example of orchestrating popular chess for the masses.
BUT..best of all time..Capa and Morphy lost so few against their contemporaries. Alekhine was possessed of something special too...i'll work on resurrecting them. I'd rather see them play fischer chess, that would be something. 24. Июня 2005, 08:25:20 Субъект: Re: a valid point danoschek: at any rate, the creation of pawn accounts will spread enough chaff to blur any countermeasures we may take for those who are determined to see their numbers up. 23. Июня 2005, 13:13:31 when you say inactivity, i hope you mean moving rather than finishing games? 19. Января 2005, 17:31:10 Субъект: Re: Bry: no way to check, so no way to win. 20. Октября 2004, 17:55:14 i'd definitely play that opening again. I lost the game, but that's beside the point :) 20. Октября 2004, 16:33:27 i much prefer his chances. That's ok, losing makes us more human. 19. Октября 2004, 17:42:05 I believe Alex can force zugzwang to win. Of course anyone'd offer the draw, there's no chance to win! 4. Августа 2004, 06:17:58 if i could program better, i'd take a shot at dark..it would be a real challenge. 4. Августа 2004, 03:23:04 WhisperzQ is right...there is always a chance you'll be playing a prog. Maybe there is even one for dark chess out there. But most variants have very weak progs that 1600-1700 level players can beat consistently. Personally I am rated lowest in progable games, so I think I'm playing against progs, but it doesn't bother me, there are always ways to steer clear of them. Or, as BB said, you can take the enlightened attitude that you don't mind playing them no matter what. 3. Августа 2004, 10:24:14 Субъект: cheating bishop, the only way to be assured that you're not playing against help, consultation or electronic, is to play Dark Chess. Otherwise, it's totally up in the air. I know of many players here rated 2100+ that have admitted to cyborging. If dark doesn't suit you, try ones with weaker progs such as anti, amazons or ones where no one uses progs, like backgammon! |
Дата и время
Друзья в сети
Любимые форумы
Клубы
Советы
|
|
Копирайт © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рахунек, все права зарезервированы. Наверх |