Förteckning över diskussionsforum
Du har inte tillstånd att skriva på denna sida. Lägsta nivå på medlemskap för att kunna skriva i detta forum är Brain Bonde.
AlliumCepa: I think Pedro's point is that spirit_66 suggests that all Romanian players are cheaters (which is how it really sounds like it). And such remarks should not be posted anywhere.
AlliumCepa: ME jumping to general conclusions? ME being insulting? LOL You are either kidding me or there must be a few brain cells missing inside your skull.
nabla: actually I had nowhere to stay in Calgary so I planned to creep out of town and park é sleep in a truck stop but I missed every one of them so just kept going.
AlliumCepa: its not a long journey for those who love driving. I drove right through from Winnipeg to VCancouver a few months ago, only stopping in Calgary for a few hours to get drunk !!!!!!!!!
Hi all, I am looking to start a backgammon club for any users here that live in Winnipeg Currently the only players I know in Winnipeg are Myself paully and pops635
If anyone else is living in Winnipeg and would like to start a club with me, let me know by PM
Also if you do not live in Winnipeg but are close enough to travel, feel free to also respond
wetware: thanks so much for all your help with that Gerard. It was much appreciated and always good to see someone going out of their way to help others
kocmoc should have all wins stripped from him. he is possibly a multi nick with WildBoy or even if not, there is considerable cheating to attain the rating in Hyper Backgammon that he has kocmoc's profile even shows he is wild boy as his profile reads as such "kocmoc (wild boy)"
Here are some examples of cheating
1. He has played 18 games against WildBoy and won every one of them. This is virtually impossible.
2. Here is an example of an intentional bad move to allow his kocmoc ID to win the game Hyper Backgammon (kocmoc vs. WildBoy) With black clearly losing, black chooses not to hit with the 18 to 14 move a no brainer
3. Here is another example of an intentional bad move to allow his kocmoc ID to win the game Hyper Backgammon (WildBoy vs. kocmoc) The dice 5-4 should have been used to go from the 2 point to the 11 point sending black to the bar. Instead, WildBoy opts to set his own pieces up for black to take them
This is blatant obvious multi nick cheating that should lead to kocmoc getting all his ratings stripped from him and any multi nicks banned from the site.
This message has also been sent in a pm to Fencer for his use.
Marian_colonelu has a number of times offered a draw in matches where I am about to win. I know this is not exactly cheating, but some players clicking quickly may not notice and then accept Please beware of this type of behaviour
I like this tool. GABBI is--according to their web page--"...a free web utility that allows you to create and save a backgammon board diagram. You can create the board manually and/or import/export to or from gnubg."
playBunny:You might add that backgammon without the cube is an integral part of backgammon with the cube, since most matches include a Crawford game and other cube-dead situations.
grenv: Then I think that your analogy is both too strong and too weak. It's too strong because Chess without the king is not Chess whereas any gammon game without the cube is still the same gammon game. The scoring changes, as well as a touch of tactics, but not the game itself.
On the other hand, the cube/king analogy is too weak. If you said. referring to the game of Grasshopper itself, "Shall we play Chess where all the pieces are the same, get placed on the board one after the starting with an empty board, and where the pieces must start in the centre and each piece must touch another, and whereby placing any piece which forms lines of opponent pieces which are "bracketed" by that piece and another of the player's get turned into pieces for that player?" then you'd be about right in matching Grasshopper to Backgammon.
Or putting it a different way, if the board was unrolled so that it was flat and went in only one direction and the quadrant boundaries were drawn as hedges and the peices were turned into frogs then Grasshopper could be called Froghopper and nobody would think that it was derived from Backgammon any more than Reversi is derived from Chess.
alanback: Please sign up -> 8000 :D & 1200 ;) (single elimination for 8, Fisher's clock 3/0.8/15 with autopass & immediately start) WITHOUT CUBE (for this moment Grasshopper is only without cube) More informations about Fischer's clock on BrainKing & BrainRook
Please sign up -> 8000 :D & 1200 ;) (single elimination for 8, Fisher's clock 3/0.8/15 with autopass & immediately start) More informations about Fischer's clock on BrainKing & BrainRook
Novice question: Wouldn't having both players use the same dice fix that? The game would be fair even if the dice weren't. Or would that create new problems (other than breaking tradition)?
And as for my original question, the reason I mentioned it is because I was wondering if moving three checkers instead of four would make for an interesting variant. It seems like having to move three checkers would force a player to leave oneself open to a hit more often than when moving four checkers. That might balance out the higher pips per roll of doubles. I thought it would be an interesting variant.
(dölj) Om du vill få reda på mera om några spel, så kan du kolla avsnittet Länkar och se om det finns några intressanta länkar där. (pauloaguia) (Visa alla tips)