Användarnamn: Lösenord:
Registrering av Ny Användare
Moderator: SueQ , coan.net 
 Backgammon

Backgammon and variants.

Backgammon Links


Meddelanden per sida:
Förteckning över diskussionsforum
Du har inte tillstånd att skriva på denna sida. Lägsta nivå på medlemskap för att kunna skriva i detta forum är Brain Bonde.
Läge: Alla kan skriva
Söka bland inlägg:  

<< <   56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65   > >>
15. januari 2006, 15:50:50
Czuch 
I just played through over 50 backgammon games without even 1 double roll. Am I just unlucky or is the random dice generator not doing such a good job?

15. januari 2006, 15:54:13
Kili 
Ämne: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Maybe you are falling in love :)

15. januari 2006, 15:56:02
Pedro Martínez 
Ämne: Re:
Ändrat av Pedro Martínez (15. januari 2006, 16:04:22)
Czuch Chuckers: I just went through all the games you have played this year and you rolled doubles in every single one of them.

15. januari 2006, 16:03:04
Chicago Bulls 
Ändrat av Chicago Bulls (15. januari 2006, 16:06:56)
It depends on the length your games had (match length and game length).
For example for 50 1-point/single games of a short 20 moves per game(that means i've taken the best case so your case would have even less probability) the probability of not having a single double is:
(5/6)^(50·20) = 6.5 E-78 %
That means a 100% FLAW on dice generator!!!!!

But i guess you are overreacting and that "50" and "NO double at all" is not correct....


PS: To give a feeling of what 6.5 E-78 % is:
6.5 E-78 % = 0.000000000....another 65 zeros....00065 %

15. januari 2006, 16:03:55
Czuch 
Ämne: Re:
Pedro Martínez: lol.... I meant that I moved one move in 50 different games without a double roll....

15. januari 2006, 16:07:56
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Ändrat av playBunny (15. januari 2006, 16:09:01)
Pedro: You checked tham all?

Matarilevich; Yep, and I believe her name's Babygirlle.

15. januari 2006, 16:08:52
Chicago Bulls 
Ämne: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Oh that means a probebility of:
(5/6)^50 = 0.011 % Not so unlikely.....:-)

15. januari 2006, 16:11:14
Czuch 
Ämne: Re:
Pythagoras: So 1 double in 50 rolls is not unlikely?

15. januari 2006, 16:12:21
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: (5 / 6) ^ 50
Pythagoras: Yep, it's a one in 9100 chance - an everyday kind of occurence.

15. januari 2006, 16:13:44
Kili 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
playBunny: Babygirlle?? But she is very young for C.C.

15. januari 2006, 16:15:40
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?

15. januari 2006, 16:16:12
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Matarilevich: No such thing!

15. januari 2006, 16:17:27
Chicago Bulls 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Ändrat av Chicago Bulls (15. januari 2006, 16:17:40)
playBunny: Maybe he meant he didn't have 50 doubles in his last 50 moves?!? LOL!

15. januari 2006, 16:19:43
Pedro Martínez 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Pythagoras: I guess so too! LOL...what a bad luck...

15. januari 2006, 16:20:26
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
playBunny: hat first link, that was doubles for my opponent, the second link, I havent made a move in that game yet today, I havent looked at the other two yet. Since I posted the first time, I now have rolled 2 doubles today.

15. januari 2006, 16:21:18
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Pythagoras: LOL

Matarilevich: She be past the age of majority plus a little bit more.

15. januari 2006, 16:24:24
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Czuch: Eh? The first link is a pass for your opponent, janka/Amálka, and a 4-4 for you (move #21). The second is a pass for CindyTN and a 4-4 for you (move #9)! Have another beer, mate.

15. januari 2006, 16:25:21
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
playBunny: Yes, the third link you posted was a move made today after my first post, and the fourth link that was not a move I made today as well. Nice try though....

15. januari 2006, 16:27:16
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
playBunny: Okay, but only one of those was a move I made today, and that one was after my first post on the subject, and I am not drinking quite yet today!

15. januari 2006, 16:30:20
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Ändrat av playBunny (15. januari 2006, 16:30:54)
Czuch: Then I'm not sure what you mean by 50 different games. You've only got 51 games and 8 of them aren't Backgammon and now it turns out you haven't moved in a number of others, so... I'm lost. What are you saying happened?

15. januari 2006, 16:42:48
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Ändrat av Czuch (15. januari 2006, 16:43:52)
playBunny: Okay, my first 50 moves today in backgammon games I didnt roll any doubles.... that is what I meant to say! I now have rolled 3 doubles since then.

15. januari 2006, 17:57:51
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
Czuch: I'm slow today but now I gotcha. Don't mind me, I'm from sleep deprivation, lol.

And it's a 9100 to 1 happening, so pretty wierd indeed. ;-)

16. januari 2006, 00:51:04
grenv 
Ämne: Re: No doubles or vision troubles?
playBunny: But it would happen quite often if 100 people play 500 moves a day (once a week or so).

16. januari 2006, 15:16:41
Kili 
Ämne: Re:
ShunAyumiTaiki: The player from the list of blocked users cannot:
* invite you to a game,
* see you on Who is online page,
* send you a message,
* add you to their Friends list
but i am not sure of he can not write you a message into the started game. Maybe someone can help you about this doubt.

16. januari 2006, 16:00:49
coan.net 
Ämne: Backgammon Board
Ändrat av coan.net (16. januari 2006, 16:16:56)
This is the backgammon board, lets try to keep our heated discussions on how the dice cheat people. :-)

I have removed all the off-topic posts - please do not be offended if I removed one of yours even if you were trying to help, but they did not make much since once I removed the original posts. I left Matarilevich's post below since it is very good advice for anyone that is having a problem with another user to place them on their Blocked users list.

Plus if you have someone as a blocked users, you will no longer see in-game chat from the person. (They can continue to write and think they are writting to you, but you will no longer have to read it.)

Thanks.

16. januari 2006, 16:50:44
alanback 
Ämne: Re: Backgammon Board
BIG BAD WOLF: Thanks BBW :)

16. januari 2006, 18:04:26
Chicago Bulls 
Ämne: Re:
Matarilevich:

I would a bit correct the aforementioned like this:

A person that is on you list of blocked users as Person-A cannot:
* invite you to a game using the Person-A profile,
* see you on Who is online page using the Person-A profile,
* send you a message using the Person-A profile,
* add you to their Friends list using the Person-A profile.

>but i am not sure of he can not write you a message into the started game. Maybe someone can help you about this doubt.

He can't write you any message on an already started game using the Person-A profile....

16. januari 2006, 18:30:58
Andersp 
Ämne: Re: Backgammon Board
BIG BAD WOLF: I think you need to try again LOL

16. januari 2006, 18:41:58
alanback 
Ämne: Re:
Pythagoras: Are you suggesting that only Type A personalities can be blocked? ;-)

16. januari 2006, 18:54:05
playBunny 
alanback:

And there's very possibly a correlation in that idea.

Pythagorus: As BBW said: "They can continue to write and think they are writing to you, but you will no longer have to read it.". I tested this by blocking a friend in a game just now. All the messages - his and mine - disappeared and then reappeared when I unblocked him. Presumably, then, the offending diatribe plus any additionas will be in the game record for such time as the writer is unblocked.

16. januari 2006, 18:58:33
alanback 
Ämne: Re:
playBunny: So every blocked player is a Pandora's box of vituperation waiting to be unleashed . . . reminds me of something one of my partners once said: "One day the sky will be black with chickens coming home to roost!"

16. januari 2006, 19:08:00
playBunny 
alanback: LOL. That's funny!

21. januari 2006, 23:44:44
Czuch 
Ändrat av Czuch (23. januari 2006, 13:17:07)
XUG?????

I was at 2250, and in 13th position about a month ago, now I am at 2115!!!!!!

What happened?????

21. januari 2006, 23:57:14
Pedro Martínez 
Ämne: Re:

21. januari 2006, 23:57:33
pentejr 
Ämne: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: According to your rating graph, your peak rating was 2232.

22. januari 2006, 00:00:43
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: What the fandangle?
Czuch: "What happened?????"

You played the last month in a dream and didn't notice all those "Your opponent has moved all their pieces out" messages.

22. januari 2006, 14:25:26
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: What the fandangle?
playBunny: I guess I am wondering what I am doing differently..... How have I gone so awry?

22. januari 2006, 14:50:04
Czuch 
2102 now! Stop the free fall!!!!

22. januari 2006, 15:00:16
Chicago Bulls 
Ämne: Re:
Ändrat av Chicago Bulls (22. januari 2006, 15:00:52)
Czuch Chuckers: It depends from you your opponents and the dice.....Such distribution is normal.
I've dug out some results from me against Jellyfish (5-point matches). Here are the results (1=win for me , 0=lose for me):
1011000110111011100100111111111010111011101


01011000000011011001001110101101 101001 = 48/80 = 60%
As you may see i have series of 9 matches won and series of 7 mathes lost. That is normal.....

An easy way to stop the free fall is to stop playing for a while so the graph would stop look like a free fall....

22. januari 2006, 15:34:02
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: Free fall
Czuch: It's hard to know if the free fall is due to the runs of luck that Pythagoras was referring to or whether it's a change in your playing. Certainly stress will make me play badly (and it even seems to affect my luck somehow). Sometimes these things happen because you get a set of games which are exploring new territory so you go down because you're making mistakes, but you learn from them and are better in the future. Have a look at the graphs of other players and you'll see similar patterns. Alanback, for instance. His skill cannot be doubted but he has the ocassional bad patch followed by a climb back to glory..

22. januari 2006, 17:39:43
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: Free fall
playBunny: Yeah... Imthink part of it is the two game stair matches I play, for one example. I end up losing 14 bkr points in a draw against a low rated player, or even worse if I happen to lose both games!

I have to be like you, and become more discriminating in the kinds of games I accept and play!

22. januari 2006, 17:53:55
playBunny 
Ämne: Re: Free fall
Czuch: Yep, I won't play singles when they are so unfairly rated. That's one part of the solution. Another part is to make fewer mistakes.

22. januari 2006, 18:01:23
grenv 
Ämne: Re: Free fall
Czuch Chuckers: Since the cube came in my hyper rating has skyrocketted, which supports the view that single games are too much about luck. If you want a fairer rating play at least 5 point cube matches.

22. januari 2006, 21:11:13
Czuch 
Ämne: Re: Free fall
grenv: Maybe I was just over rated and the cube has exposed my poor play....

22. januari 2006, 21:37:18
Czuch 
Ämne: Update
2095 now....

22. januari 2006, 21:57:52
Chicago Bulls 
When you meet our new year, tell it a hello from me..... Oh and while passing from 2010 tell me who will win the football world cup then.....

22. januari 2006, 22:25:02
furbster 
but don't tell me i want to enjoy watching it

22. januari 2006, 22:32:45
Czuch 
Ämne: Re:
Pythagoras: Well... the 2096 world cup winner will be the US, but I dont think will be visiting the new year, thank you.

22. januari 2006, 23:59:35
Pedro Martínez 
Ämne: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: There will be no World Cup in 2096, LOL.

23. januari 2006, 00:30:38
grenv 
Ämne: Re:
Pedro Martínez: I believe that was the point. The U.S was planning to hold their own cup between their A and B teams and call the winner the world champion. Oh, wait, they already do that in some sports.

<< <   56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65   > >>
Datum och tid
Vänner online
Favoritforum
Vängrupper
Dagens tips
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Tillbaka till sidans början