Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Subjekt: Re:If there is a separation of church and state, then why are some politicians selling their perceived Chistian values as potential government policy
Übergeek 바둑이:<b>Übergeek 바둑이</b>: Artful Dodger:
> Obeying the government is a Christian principle.
Where in the Bible does it say that? "To Caesar what is of caesar. To God what is of God."
Romans 13:1 says, "Let every person be in subjection to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those which exist are established by God." Acts 5:29 says, <span>"We must obey God rather than men." Whenever a government violates biblical teaching----
> Being a good citizen is a Christian principle. How so? What does a "good citizen" mean?
Rom. 13:6-7, <span>"For because of this you also pay taxes, for rulers are servants of God, devoting themselves to this very thing. 7 Render to all what is due them: tax to whom tax is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor."
> It doesn't make one a Christian just becuase they follow the principles. But there is no escaping the influence of the Judeo/Christian ethic.
But here is the thing, the "Christian ethic" existed before Jesus was born.
I never made the claim otherwise. But there is no doubt that the Judeo/Christian ethic is foundational to laws in the US (just read all the early writings...."We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." I'm not going to split hairs over the chicken or egg.
>> "Everybody is required to pay for Defense Insurance"
> I won't even bother with a statement like this. It's false on the face of it. Please don't post this again. It hurts when I fall on the floor and laugh my @$$ off.
You are missing the point. It is an analogy. If people who did not pay "Defense Insurance" were not protected, they would be forced to go to war to defend themselves; just as those without healthcare are forced to fend for themselves when they have no money.
Nonsense. (meaning you make no sense here). The government is required by LAW to protect its citizens and they are allowed by LAW to collect taxes. It's NOT insurance. That's just so far wrong there's no point in discussing it further. Your analogy fails here. Better for you to show why the individual mandate in the ObamaCare bill is Constitutional. Paying for defense IS.
(skryť) Pri písaní príspevkov alebo správ môžete použiť jednoduché HTML tagy. Platiaci členovia majú možnosť zapnúť Rich Text Editor. (pauloaguia) (zobraziť všetky tipy)