Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Artful Dodger: If the life of the female carrying the baby is ruined through your law...
I don't see you or lemon really answering that. The baby seems to have more rights than the mother to be in your scenario.
If it was a incest rape, the baby was (via scans) shown to be massively deformed... you'd still insist she carries it to term?
This is real life.. not some fairy tale, where everyone lives happily ever after.
" There are thousands of loving homes waiting for a child should the woman not want to raise the child herself."
Guaranteed? No prospects of divorce?? ... some Hollywood star gonna decide they'll adopt yet another baby like AJ likes to do because she can pay off the parents to have what she wants!!