traditional games - perhaps you know already ... ~*~

nice summary by specialists, show your kids.
Go figure that the search for deminers might be blocked,
because slavery-supporter Ashcroft banned the word 'bomb' ~*~

Problem is, a guest sees all public boards, regardless of her/his age.
the visible image will become part of the general reward of a site.
Normal, that in general chat some loose lingo occurs and is tolerated ...
I don't think all public boards should be public for non-members, thus.
The game-specific boards though could be an attraction as first spot,
unless some obsessive idiots misuse it for cheating their reward. ~*~

that 62% of all statisticians feel 76% confident about 83% of their statistics. ~*~

I request that the T-Shirts use only cotton from social affiliates in Nicaragua,
that they are mouthpainted by disadvantaged children with nutrial colour and,
butt-blown dried under host of the Union of Underprivileged Bean-Farmers. ~*~

two additional buttons would be useful.
"place remaining ships randomly" and,
"clear board and place ships randomly" ~*~

public or not as option ... ( so players could
try out or train some lines together that are
not supposed to be known until a certain event )

all tournament games should be uncovered
though after the king was struck, imho ... ~*~

implementing rules that are not written down is nonsense ~*~

<*
Would Fencer perhaps agree to the establishment
of a "Complaint Dept." DB where everybody could
speak their mind unfettered by restraints of corrupt
and biased moderators ? Heard some folks would
be glad to lend their services to such an endeavour ... >8) ~*~

short games are not counted, am I right ?
but that's not okay for (crazy) screen chess.
you might remember our first game Fencer -
a high poker, but completed correctly ...

so it indeed should count regardless of the amount of moves ...

now I'm just getting a mate in two, after a crazy screen chess setup ...

it should not be idle playing well, you know ... :D ... ~*~
g=182588

to make some sense at least.

this is the board for requests to fencer, as I used it regarding
a misfeature, if that should be a telegraph for you. welcome. ~*~

PS
but a telegraph for eddie: my notepad is quicker than you cAn delete

he's not only a shame for this server, but also for the free world ... who
wouldn't grant him an own musty corner that he made from the gothic board
- lunatics have to be kept busy before they inflict damage in the streets -
and even if just by their tiny enjoyment of deleting any objections diligently.

but now that he starts to sabotate functional boards also,
finally a border should have been reached - it is the 'tournament board'
for tournament-announcements as well - we don't need another berlusconi
deciding who's to kiss the oxyclean t-shirt in a spot.

pardon me for being particulary allergic against his attitude, most higher
educated german postwar citizens are, regarding sad parts of our history. ~*~

particulary annyoing as he lies as soon as his lips are moving ...
I said he violates fairness in his so called world championship ...

below the original he refers to - does it sound as if top-players avoid
playing me when I clearly state I play all of them ?? oh my he needs help.
and to be removed as disgusting leftover from times of occupied media.
there is no 'I and other players' eddieboy - you are the only one who's
counterfeited board-messages so far - don't try to be a 'we' - as we don't.

what I wrote yesterday upon his ranting, I think very moderately - deleted.
________________________________________________

probably as some people cannot post to me 0:) no invitation arrived
uhmm but *suppressed yawn* when I'm done with the important things
like, playing all top players in all variants *supressed yay!*, I'll consider
checking the tourney page for substance in your personal attacks >:=)
~*~
______________________________________________

whilst his 'invitational post' originally contained the usual suggestions
to shut up and other offensive passes, that he now quickly edited away
to barely make his latest blur not entirely contradicting the obvious ... ~*~

PS
and go figure, his 'one last comment' will also
this time remain an empty promise and, scamp.

I tried to accomodate a request as I had noticed that Fencer was
not online much - anything else was strictly feature-oriented as that
fiddling moderator who was reported already before, as busted on
even counterfeiting board-messages has to be reconfigured not only imho ...
dare your fantasy - on this board I targeted him as bk-feature malfunction ... ~*~

during the past two days, he should be granted a vacant
weekend from time to time - Liquid has held the fortress ... ;)

of course the game will be restaured as it happened during
your holidays anyway and belonged to the flaws of that
only a harrasser and message-faker of the trice type, but
no moderator would consider drawing any advantage from ...

go figure why that joke of a federation has only 500 members - and this in
a country having almost an equally high population as the EU - who would
voluntarily (unless with masochistic tendencies) surrender to a megalomaniac who screws up erraneously every now and then ? my yahoo club grew to 300 in between a few months, honesty is that attracts, wishiwashi not ... ~*~

1) could we have the option of a real correspondance chess ?
i.e. 30 days reflection time per 10 moves, cumulatably -
1st time-violation lets restart that cycle and means warning,
2nd time-violation loses the game unconditionally.

2) offering draw should be changed generally ...
according to the rules it has to be done after a move and,
two draw-offers 'in row' by the same person are not allowed
i.e. the right to offer draw alternates between both players.

~*~

anything to advance the board topic ?
not ? I thought so ... buh bye ... ~*~

it's okay, ear-stuffer ... smartness of games is really not your subject.

and now back off and put your obsessive iyt-bs where it belongs ...
my pygmy pony sounds better from his back than you from the front ...

I refrain from requesting to implement some artificial intelligence as new
feature for our comrade with such an immense natural stupidity because
respecting board topics is an unconquerable obstacle for hollow ramble-
fanatics and their dwarfhood of screwing up to personal attacks ... ~*~

I support implementing the doubling cube because unlike other rules and
their supporters it improves the smartness of the game ... good night :) ~*~

you should know at least the rules here ... :P ... ~*~

are as usual coming from you ...

playing to the rules is playing to the rules ...
you wanted to change them - I did not call that cheating either
just (go figure) ignorant ... as to believe bigger words have bigger meanings ~*~

was added by people who don't like to cope with the entire smartness
of the game and, should be abandoned anyway ... as we do here ... ~*~

could you repeat that, Harley ? roflmao !
it's very hot here, but after the rain I'll grasp for sure ~*~

add to favs is a clumsy option - why should I have
a fellowships list then altogether ? this feature request
was alredy made, Fencer said he loves the idea and,
he'll implement it ... hmm - was a few weeks ago ...
aware of the yet missing 2nd server probably something
to do the week after ... ;) ... ~*~

would be just like an extended board-logic, okay ... ~*~

is a manner of defining.

both chess games I have lost were won beyond doubts.

nice quiz btw what happened there ... :D

I don't know anyway which game-type was targeted in particular
but I hardly could imagine it as an acceptable treating ...

an umpire would be required with highest possible own skills, for each type,
and would not be that player also a competitor for the players he has to judge ?

thin ice. ~*~

is a manner of defining.

both chess games I have lost were won beyond doubts.

nice quiz btw what happened there ... :D

I don't know anyway which game-type was targeted in particular
but I hardly could imagine it as an acceptable treating ...

an umpire would be required with highest possible own skills, for each type,
and would not be that player also a competitor for the players he has to judge ?

thin ice. ~*~

at that opportunity I'd like to remind of the
suggestion to have an option of specified ratings.

i.e showing a splitted view of the
performance as player one or player two ... ~*~

nothing is more boring than inaproppriate usage of always and never,
shows the minor valuable ambition of a poster - get a life !!
( to make, unlike you, a feature request from that nonsense ) ~*~

PS
the nagging of Sadam's accomplices ALWAYS
centered around the states - bad bad USA ! :O
my my - what about a brain as additional feature ?

somebody with a touch of culture would
not like to know any of them, unacanta ... :/

and indeed I too suggest deleting that post from a TRUE member of
an iyt-harrasser club and, merely my sherlock humbug coment as well ... 0:)

but I smell it I tl ya ... 8) ... ~*~

for the newbee-babble-barrier feature-request ... ~*~

PS
begone with fakes only created for worshipping iyt-bs
why don't I wonder who returned simultaneously from a break
but regarding the studder-style actually two other candidates, too wimpish
for standing to the original IDs they've used to abuse, are imaginable yet :P
... yes ... *sniff-sniff* ... yes ... - I dare to fix it ... Alabama ! :D

in my not so humble opinion - I assume ... :)) ~*~

do I really have to delete and refound my fellowship
for booting a supporter of the iyt harrasser-clubs ? ~*~

there should be an option to remove members.

especially in the bigger ones it might not be easy
anyway, to entirely prevent folks from joining under
covered colours - e.g., with an iyt-layer underneath ... ~*~

I think adding it to the favourites would just waste space.

in that case I would not need the fellowships list at my page ...

but actually I like the 'grouped' listings and would love to see it advanced ... ~*~

what about a feature showing a 'new-message' notification as
it happens to be implemented already for the favourite boards ? ~*~

works fine, Fencer ... loads into chessbase without problems ...

thanks :) ... ~*~

thanks Kevin but everything was according to the rules, the intended
position worked well when setting it up for our game, on top of that,
even of some my preset games wouldn't load properly against macoan.
they simply leave one piece outside and ... are sulky ... :O

I made it now to find two usable positions, fortunately
stored yet from playing around with the new feature lately ...

I tried to set up one for the waiting room to see what happens,
but before somebody accepts, the editor is not available .... ~*~

I can't set up my screen/crazy screen-chess games against BBW (macoan)
the editor lets me place only 15 pieces (in both games) and gets sulky then :O

noticed it at my previous session already but thought I had been
distracted somehow, making a mistake ... no, it just doesn't let me.

I'm not able to start my tournament games with black pieces. ~*~

<and indeed it is useful to know whether an opponent is just playing
our board - it might lead me to stay a bit and wait what happens.

perhaps the option by default should be turned off in server rush hours
- but if the wish to get the information lets someone load his opponent's
profile additionally, the purpose, i.e. less data-traffic, is missed ...

actually I would like to have a switchable stealth-mode ... 0:)

e.g. if I am viewing Dmitri's keryo-games to shamelessly utilize
his ideas against Erika's basic formation, her chance to notice that
would be blocked by me temporarily ... >:D ... ~*~

the clear-link is right below the save-option, you likely found it meanwhile. :)

and I tried to point at the detail, that for me it worked well so far, but
as soon as I once accidently clicked 'back' in the browser, the piece
which was placed before, seems to stick somehow, - unremovable ... ~*~

the editor-bug has only occured if I used 'back' of the browser
instead of clicking at the piece on the board to remove it,
as probably intended ... - then only clearing the board helped. ~*~

(everybody agrees) ~*~

PS
the (crazy) screen-chess editor still seems a bit buggy at removing pieces.

it's just ridiculous when the mobbers and harrassers
(like Hannelore and Rose) become moderators themselves. ~*~

and it's funny that someone who's, by his unchanged iyt-attitudes
of background-spinning, major responsible for some board trouble
(as documented), sticks it at his banner - transparent, if a flatus
evaded you, quickly look accusatingly at your neighbour. ~*~

I checked ... In Germany, the 'Kosmos' Company
provides new sets, used 3M sets are available at ebay.

***here*** I found a twixt-page at mindsports ~*~

in the 70s when I bought it (25 bucks, at that time high end game price)
it was by 3M as I believe to remember ...
sadly a former gurlfriend 'accidently' packed it when she moved ... :D

as I stated it is unique, although the territory-system of go shines through ...

and yes, links should be re-arrangable, that's essential imho. ~*~

I would vote for that game too ...

although basicly kinda go-derivate the 'knights'-geometry
of the chain to be built makes a unique game ... ~*~

is football-chess ... :D

d1/e1 respectively d8/e8 are the 'goals'

the king is just an ordinary piece and may be struck ...

any piece that reaches physically the opponent's goal, counts.

otb we've usually played it with two half-times ... :P

clock set up like for 3-mins-blizz, a goal ends a clock session,
after quarter an hour a short break - then again 15 mins with
exchanged colours ...

player with more goals after fulltime wins ...

at brainking it could be played like a regular 3-or-4-wins match. ~*~

PS: happy pass-over ... :)

we agreed that you don't understand me, right ?

I posted two msgs regarding bk-features (moderators) to Fencer.

keep your advice where it belongs ... i.e. not at this board ... ~*~