I am still BigBoss of Loop Chess Club even though I am pawn. This situation is bit problematic, there is people of who would like to join and do stuff. I think it would be better if BigBoss even if he is pawn give his status away and maybe even could read and write at his/her fellowship. Is this too much?

Daniel Snyder: Their team would be strong at least in paper...

grant: I think the same. Allthought the game is quite boring anyway, sorry ludo lovers.

Summertop: Also indicator for tournaments where you cannot sign, could be on the same column where the you are allready signed mark.

I think that sonnebonbergers should not be counted like now they are counted in cubic gammons. In this tournament the one who did not win anygames got most Sonnebon-bergers. It should be counted as it would have been only lost, win or draw not as. Of course this is only my opinion.
http://brainking.com/fi/Tournaments?tri=70414

mctrivia: In one place there was one day or something like that that kind of thing. And did suck and it was removed. One another thing is is that kind of auto translators to all languages? No and they will have to read crappy english and if they are not too good at it. If that could have on/off it would be ok.

mctrivia: If they would work well enough, why this pages would need translators in first place. I insist because they do not work well.

Walter Montego: Problem with those games witch contains luck is that the system is made for chess. Because that system is made from statistics. It should be done to every game own, that it will be perfect. The hyper backgammon is the most problematic i think. There player with random moves can even won. It contains nearly pure luck if both think for while the maximum thought winrate should not be higher 75 percent or something like that.
For me this is pretty same. I do not play for rating. I play to win.

It is not count, that is the problem
Walter Montego:
"Salkkuman: I completely agree with you, but didn't it count as a win when he deleted the game?"

After we had both putted our pieces and i had moved once, my opponent deleted the game. I have allready winning position. This is not fair. Deleting should not be possible after putting the pieces. Or what do you think?

Is it going to be 19x19? For me it is a lot more important than smaller like 9x9 and 13x13. Or all of them. And how you have thought komi the handicap given white?

headius:
I like go also

It wuold be nice to play chess with luck, game where one roll the dice which unit to move. in chess there are six kind of pieces. And of cource if one is checed then you roll again if you cannot move that to stop check.

I wuold like to play riffle chess, chess were capturing is done only buy taking the piece out. Also african chess would be great same as normal but elephant(rook) moves to 2 square every where if in a1 it can go a2 a3 b1 b2 b3 c1 c2 c3 and can jump over. Knight moves normally but because it is giraffe it can also it enemy whit it long neck. In f3 it can eat off the enemy on f7 or b3 of course over pieces. And bishop is normal exept it freeze the enemy around it (one square) if bishops freeze other bishop it can still move. King pawn and queen are normal.