come join the Thanks given Bash starting Oct 9th all games

imsoaddicted: Thanks! I didn't think so, but wanted to make sure...

Binabik: i dont think it will make a difference as there isnt going to be a 2 player win

I started 2 tourneys with an 8 player max per section and an 8 player max for the tourney. I noticed that for the "final match" it also says 11 point cube - what will happen if 2 players win? Should I change this? Here's the link: 11 POINT CUBE 2100+ FIRST 8 PLAYERS

ALL GAMES 1 HOUR

Will be Starting every DAY around 5 PM

Join in and HAVE SOME FUN

CHALLANGE YOUR FRIENDS TO SIGH UP

It is Great Way to enjoy yourself.

You will get youself ALL HYPER waiting for them to START

Its a GREAT way to pass some TIME

ENJOY AND HAVE SOME FUN:)

CRY ME A RIVER: thanks shame the site was acting funny at the time thou

furbster: awww 2nd is just as good

ALL GAMES 1 HOUR

Hyper Backgammon

WINNERS
Mary Jo, Blue J,CRY ME A RIVER
Congrats:)

Ludo
WINNER
imsoaddicted
Congrats:)

Good Luck to Eternity, and ms delete for making the finals of Universals for all.

bouncybouncy: Well played, i had to settle for 2nd lol.

mrloupcity: Thank you very much sweetie

Tournament: mrloupcity's first brain tourney (Backgammon)

Winner of the tournament: bouncybouncy

ALL GAMES 1 HOUR

If you never played TRY its a LOT OF FUN

Enjoy and Have Fun:)

Starts in less than 7 HOURS

tournament who want play?

to get the tournies going

Backgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck FULL

Nackgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck FULL

Backgammon Race 1700+ 8 players by the duck Only 4 but will start

Crowded Backgammon 1700+8 players by the duck Only 4 but will start

Hyper Backgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck FULL

Don't be too late... Last hours...

Click to test your skills if you eligible to play:

Top 10% Faster Backgammoners for 2006-09

Thanks

We still have some spots open.

Backgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck SORRY FULL

Nackgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck 2 OPEN

Backgammon Race 1700+ 8 players by the duck 5 OPEN changed 4
OPEN

Crowded Backgammon 1700+8 players by the duck 4 OPEN

Hyper Backgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck SORRY STILL FULL

(added) For the tourneies to start we only need a minimum of 4 players.

Hrqls: forgot to add the link :)
http://brainking.com/nl/Pond?g=2701&trnst=0&trt=1001

Knight Relay Chess  Please ask for an invite and join.

the other one filled up was fast!

ok we have another one .. this one only needs 2 more players

anyone want to make a wet run at night ? ;)

who dares!?

http://brainking.com/nl/Pond?g=2700&trnst=0&trt=1001

We still have some spots open.

Backgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck 1 open

Nackgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck 4 open

Backgammon Race 1700+ 8 players by the duck 6 open

Crowded Backgammon 1700+8 players by the duck 4 open

Hyper Backgammon 1700+ 8 players by the duck Full sorry

For the tourneies to start we only need a minimum of 4 players.

what is the prize for this event?

NAROZENINOVÝ TURNAJ -- SPECIÁL!

Hyper for tonight - two hour game

Does anybody need me for the Ludo team? I woult be very glad, so send me invite and I'll join :)

I'm looking for a
Ludo, Ambiguous Chess, Connect6
team.

ALL GAMES WITH BRAINS ENTRY FEE
One more player---50 brains

Hi, to 'The Best and The Fast Gammon Players',

This is an opportunity, check your weight against to other best players if you inside the top 10% any of Gammon Games.

Don't be afraid of endless games and tournaments! If you don't like to join to the Gammon Tournaments without end (related with the move time of the opponents), our games finish before the next month tournament generally.

We choosed publicly announce this Traditional but popular Tournaments here, in the tournaments discussion group and some fellowship groups to all the best and fast players who are inside the top 10% of any type Gammon Games.

Inside the top 10% any type Gammon player (Back, Nack, Crowded, Race, Hyper, Anti), is eligible to join to all other games in this Tournaments before the begin time. (September 15, 2006).

To check where you are in the ratings click to the related links:

Backgammon
Nackgammon
Anti Backgammon
Backgammon Race
Crowded Backgammon
Hyper Backgammon

Others, outside of top 10% players, will be deleted before the tournaments begin without excuse...

Match type: 3 points match with doubling cube
Tournament type: one match for each two players
Maximum number of players per section: 8
Final match type for two players section: 5 points match with doubling cube
Time control: Time: 2 days, Bonus: 3 hours, Limit: 9 days, no days off (red signed)

(That means after beginning you have 2 days (48 hours) for your first move. Per your another move, you'll have 3 hours bonus for your other move time. 9 days is limit time for the opponents, after the move of other side.)

Please click to the Tournament addresse and 'feel free to join to any type of Gammon Games'. You are eligible to join, to all Gammon games without restriction, only if you inside of top 10% in any Gammon Games';(for now we have only six type of Gammon games).

2006 September: Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners 2006-09

With your join to this Tournament, hope to play good matches and enjoy!

*********************************************

If you interested who were the best and fast in the previous Gammon Tournaments, please click to following addresse:

2006 July : Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners 2006-07
2006 June : Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners 2006-06
2006 May : Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners 2006-05
2006 April : Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners 2006-04
2006 March : Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners 2006-03
2006 February: Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners 2006-02
2006 January : Top 10% - Fast Backgammoners (Invited)

Thank you!

**************************************************************

jopie2002 is the Number "1", between 4 good players of the tournament 'Top 10% Faster Backgammoners for 2006-07 (Backgammon Race)'

Top 10% Faster Backgammoners for 2006-07

Congratulations jopie2002!

Thanks to all other players!

Top 10% Faster Backgammoners for 2006-07

Walter Montego: I've got the seeding tables from Pedro Martínez, they might be a little different to yours but I guess it is correct too.

gambler104: You are right about that, but the method I was using lends itself to higher powers of 2 more easily. It also depends on how much importance is placed on the ratings, their accuracy, and the goals of the tournament organizer.

I like to think that the ratings are accurate with the goal to have the best players play each other for the championship and not knock each other out in the early rounds. I'st easy to group the people by adding one to the power of 2 for the number of rounds and then pairing them that way.
8 people is three rounds 2 × 2 × 2 + 1 = 9. 1-8, 2-7, 3-6, and 4-5 should be the first round pairings. If the rounds will not be reseeded each round, which is the normal procedure, the winner of 1-8 should play the winner of 4-5, and the winner of 2-7 plays the winner of 3-6. It's fairly straight forward to draw the tree graph using the numbers and keeping them like that. A few months ago some peole posted some good links for tournament organizers and also discussion various formats of it. Perhaps someone can remember where it is and maybe add the link to this page's title. I'm willing to bet Fencer made a note of it.

For sixteen players you use 17 as the number, thirty-two uses 33.

Walter Montego: Fencer's way is one possible way to do it. Your's is another. Another is 1-5 2-6 3-7 4-8, 1-3 2-4. It would be a combination of those 2.

Fencer: Unless your ratings changed after this seeding was made, it is not correct. Also, it is customary to list the ranking with the person.

Top bracket as 1-8
next------- as 4-5
next------- as 3-6
next------- as 2-7

If done in this manner it will makes it possible to have the top seeds meet in the semi final and the number 1 and 2 meet in the final. It is easier to follow using the numbers this way too. If the ranking were done with the top four seeds and the rest assigned randomly, then I suppose it's fine and doesn't matter. It certainly is an improvement. How did you do it?