Please use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE
Babygirlle: I'm not sure where you're seeing the two dates, the one you need to be concerned about is where it says "Last term to sign up" right below the minimum number of players. Thats the date your tourney will start.
where it has the date, it has todays date the 8'th and it shows the last date to sign up as the 14, I don't know what I should put for the date to start and the last date to sign up can you help?
Nirvana: I've signed up for a lot in the PIPIKUV CAS. It would be helpful if there were some kind of "all games" reference, otherwise many players probably just overlook these.
Groeneveld: I could start such a tournament but the probability that this tournament will attract 50 or even more players is quite small. Unless I would donate a couple of years of BK-memberships ;) The second reason, besides the one-year-membership, why the "Confucius"-tournament had so many participants was that Xiangqi was quite new on this site then.
So, if you want to have another great XQ-event you would have to donate something and you would have to wait a couple of months. Because at the moment the top players are waiting for the second round of the Confucius-tournament which is about to start soon. And most of the active XQ-players are involved in the Glenfiddich team tournament.
Two Tablut tournaments are coming up in a few days:
Tablut 1700+ created by Salkkuman for players with BKR 1700 and above (as the name suggests )
and
CTRL-ALT-TABlut created by Dundee and has no rating restrictions whatsoever.
arpa: OK, I see what it is doing now - but still believe it is wrong.
It is looking at how many games within each match which were won to calculate the S-B. So no matter if the game in the match is worth 1 point, or 5 points - that part does not effect the S-B.
So for the tournamnet you gave:
You actually won 3 games against JPS - So S-B calcualted as 3x3 (9)
You actually won 2 games against aledates - so S-B calculated as 2x2 (4)
You actually won 2 games against qusar - so S-B calculates as 2x0 (0)
You actually won 0 games against Nez - so 0x2 = 0
Total = 13
For JPS:
won 3 games against arpa = 3x3 = 9
won 4 games against aledates = 4x2 = 8
won 3 games against qusar = 3x0 = 0
won 5 games against nez. = 5x2 = 10
Total = 27
.... and so on.
Anyway, this is of course the wrong way to calculate the S-B, so you need to let Fencer know.
arpa: I would go post it in the Bug Tracker if I was you - that calculated S-B makes no sense. The person who won no games even got an S-B, which normally should be 0.
Well, I am sure this was asked a 1000 times before, but wouldn't it be nicer, if the next round of a tournament would start in the moment the winner of every section is unevidably clear (and not after the very last game of every section has finished)??
(sakla) If you only look at some of the discussion boards on a regular basis you can add them to your favourite boards list by going to the Board page and clicking "Add to my favourite boards". (pauloaguia) (Bütün ipuçlarını göster)