playBunny: Wrong..i just suggested that we should have one rating for us brave players and one for the sophisticated....cant be so fun to know that you keep your rating because you dont play any player, is it?
playBunny: LOL...yes Bunny you are right, i didnt misunderstand, i (and most players here) know the real reason why you dont accept even a friendly invitation.....but to me its still more rude than to resign a finished game :)
No point..i just asked you if you think its rude to not accept a friendly game invitation since the invitor obviously has a wish to play a game against you.
playBunny: So..do you think its a good idea that we ask Fencer if he can give us an option to add a "dont resign mark" to our nickname?....i've rsigned many games and no one has complained so why should i think that they are offended?
Pogo has a fun pop-balloon game for people who loves to click!
playBunny: Even if i knew that my opponent prefers to click til the board is empty i would say "Congrats good game" asnd resign...is that an answer to your question?. And i dont consider it rude...the game is over so why go on clicking?
Family Man: Fencer's autopass is nothing but a big joke.
You cant use it in cube games and you can not use it if your opponent doesnt use it. He and i had a deal, i bought 2 black rooks and he should implement autopass. This autopassjoke is his way to keep his part of the deal
alanback: I might be stupid but im not sure i understand your talk about unfair rating. If you lose 12 points to a lower rated player its because he was lucky, but you have reached your BKR because of your skill, not luck? am i correct?
alanback: But if we didnt have any rating then you and other "very good players" could play in all tourneys without any worries and not be forced to only play each other, wouldnt that be nice? :)
alanback: Still dont get it..how can rating in a luck game be so important?...if its a skill game you shouldnt be worried to play us "not good players"?