Kullanıcı Adı: Parola:
Yeni Kullanıcı Kaydı
Moderatör: Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


Sayfadaki mesaj sayısı:
Tartışma komitesi listesi
Bu komiteye yazı yazma izniniz yok. Bu komiteye yazabilmek için minimum üyelik seviyesi Brain Piyonu.
Durum: Herkes yazabilir
Yazıların içinde ara:  

<< <   1 2   > >>
12. Ekim 2004, 18:44:22
Thad 
Konu: Re: volcanos
Thad (12. Ekim 2004, 20:22:24) tarafından düzenlendi
The volcanos are always placed symetrically so that each player has them in the same positions. There are 10 squares in which they can be placed (in any of the ten squares in the row on 'your' half of the board farthest from the edge). The formula for the number of ways to choose two squares out of ten is 10!/(10-2)!x2! = 10x9/2 = 45 ways.

12. Ekim 2004, 12:19:05
Thad 
Konu: Missing volcanoes in archived games
I think the volcanoes are missing in archived games.

11. Ekim 2004, 20:34:58
Thad 
Konu: Re: saved boards
Thad (11. Ekim 2004, 20:35:26) tarafından düzenlendi
Good point, but for casual play against different opponents, it can be a great feature. Also, the problem you mention exists now the way things are. Also, I usually load a saved board and change just a couple of things. Makes it different enough to keep my opponents guessing without making me start from scratch each time. ;-)

11. Ekim 2004, 07:57:08
Thad 
Konu: Re: saved boards
Ok, then is anyone else interested in seeing this added as a new feature too? ;-)

11. Ekim 2004, 07:25:48
Thad 
Konu: saved boards
Shouldn't we be able to save boards in both Fast Espionage and regular Espionage and use them in either game? I couldn't figure out how to do it if you can.

7. Ekim 2004, 01:08:15
Thad 
Konu: Add to rules for Small Espionage?
It would be nice to see the exact list of pieces for small Espionage. I know we start with 20 guys, but it wold be nice to have them listed. That way, in the middle of a game, I could just click on the rules link to recall what I started with!!

Also, we really need a captured pieces section like in chess.

Thanks,
Thad

29. Eylül 2004, 01:16:52
Thad 
Konu: after an attack...
After I attack an opponent's piece and lose, shouldn't I know the rank of that piece? Shouldn't the "?" be relplaced by the piece's actual value?

<< <   1 2   > >>
Tarih ve Saat
Online Arkadaşlarım
Favori Komiteler
Arkadaş Grupları
Günün ipucu
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, tüm hakları saklıdır.
Başa Dön