BrainKing - Дискусии (Achievements)

Отговорник: Fencer

Achievements

Achievements.

Списък с дискусии
Тук не Ви е разрешено да публикувате съобщения. Изисква се ниво на членство най-малко Мозъчен Кон.

Режим: Всеки може да публикува

15. май 2009, 12:43:46

AbigailII

Покажи публикациите на този потребител | Покажи темата | препратка

Относно: 50 won games of 10 game types/50 won games of 50 game types

I thought this meant that for 10 (50) game types, you have to win 50 games against different opponents. But then it claims that for the first one, I've done "7/10", which I assume to mean that I've beaten 50 different opponents in 7 different game types; however, for the second one, I have "6/50". Which would mean I've beaten 50 different opponents in only 6 different game types.

But that doesn't make sense.

So, what does this archievement mean? Or is there a bug somewhere?

16. май 2009, 05:40:25

nodnarbo

Покажи публикациите на този потребител | Покажи темата | препратка

Относно: Re: 50 won games of 10 game types/50 won games of 50 game types

AbigailII: what if 7/10 really means you've beaten 7 different opponents if 50 different game types?

16. май 2009, 07:33:28

cd power

Покажи публикациите на този потребител | Покажи темата | препратка

Относно: Re: 50 won games of 10 game types/50 won games of 50 game types

AbigailII: I think there is a bug in those achievements, too. For the achievement "10 won games of 50 game types and at least 10 moves," I have watched and counted several variants where I have sailed past 10 victories against unique opponents and more than 10 moves, but the counter never changed. The only explanation I can think of is this: The unique opponents that you have beaten in one variant can not be the same opponents you have beaten in another variant. For example, if I beat 10 different people in atomic chess, I must beat a totally different set of 10 people in corner chess in order for me to get credit for those 2 variants, meaning 20 unique people. If this is not the case, then there is definitely a bug.