用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑马级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

13. 五月 2003, 02:50:18
coan.net 
So are the Admin's looking to change what Pawn/Rooks get, or is this just a "what-if" type of thing?

If I had to choose, for Pawn i would allow them to enter 1 tournament a month. Even if the games are over, just let them start a new tournament every 30 days. And then give them say 5-10 non-tournament games. This would solve the problem of pawn trying to join tournaments, and then finding out they don't have enough free space (since it can be as many as 14 games, or smaller - it is hard to guess). No move limit - which I think most people don't like. (Heck if you limit them to 15 like someone suggested, that would mean only 1 non-tournament game!)

For Rooks - Please don't limit them to only 100 games. 200 games maybe, but I would prefer no limit. (One of the main reasons I'm a rook and not a knight)

... those are my thoughts

BBW (BIG BAD WOLF)

13. 五月 2003, 02:55:16
BlazinBrian 
题目: Re:
Right now BBW it is a what-if thing. However being realistic with all the work that is being put into making the site better limits will be soon I am sure. I think however everyone here should have a say in the potential limits and then some kind of compromise can be reached. Right now it appears that game limits as opposed to move limits seem to be better.

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端