AbigailII:

AbigailII: Some of these suggestions are really good.

Fencer: And about blocked users? It would be interesting explorer that. Blocked users by 5 or 10 players, for example. lol. I think nobody knows the number of players that block us, so would be a surprise...Well, I don't know if this is a great archievement, but i would like to see it. :)

Undertaker.: I think an Achievement should be something that you really WANT to do.

joshi tm: I understand your point, but that can be a dubious question. I don't want make "1000 moves in 1 day". However, you would want say that an archievement is a good thing (something like a guiness book lol) and my proposal is the contrary. :)

But if we're created achievements, so why not create bad achievements or something like that? Block users by 5 or 10 players; block users in 5 discussion boards; block users 5 times in the same discussion board; 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out); 5 or 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out) in same type of game.

So, is it a good idea?

Undertaker.: Of course, it's a brilliant idea.

Undertaker.:If I make 1,000 moves in 1 day, that means the rest of my day went very badly ;-)

alanback: And what about people who made 10 thousand moves in 1 day?

Fencer: Very fast connection!!!!!!!

Fencer:For them, there is no rest of the day!

Undertaker.: Short: No.

Longer: I refer to a P{laystion 3 Throphy where a player must do a friendly fire to achive an achievement, that's ridiculous!

joshi tm: Sorry, but ridiculous was your understanding. The goal would be don't achieve an achievement, of course. Besides, my idea is very usual in others situations. In USA, you have Oscares for the best movie, for the best actor, for the best actress, etc., and in the day before, there's an event where is choosed the worst movie, actor, actress, producer, etc. Of course, nobody want be the worst actor and actress, right?

And about my idea, i can understand that block users by 5 or 10 players, block users in 5 discussion boards are bad ideas or dubious ideas, but 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out), 5 or 10
consecutive lose games (with or without time-out) in same type of game, etc. would be interesting...

Undertaker.: A black achievement? Which costs points? Interesting though. Good point.

joshi tm: Yes, why not? If everybody want do achievements, nobody will want do black achievements, but sometimes we can do it against our intention, so why not create both?

joshi tm:I think "negative achievements" is a better term.

AbigailII:

Score max possible points on all of Dice Poker, Triple Dice Poker, Dice Poker 6D and Triple Dice Poker 6D. ------ That would be hard, if not almost impossible. I would be surprised if anyone has gotten the "max" points. Maybe Fencer can look through the database to find out what the highest score in all those games are, then make an achievement between 50-100 points below that max as the achievement. (of course each game would be a little different.)

coan.net:Methinks you overlooked the irony in the entire post ;-)

coan.net: Aye.... For a perfect game, it would be a one in a well... big odds.

Near perfect points though.. rare, but not impossible.

coan.net: On max score for triple dice poker, or triple 6d, I would suggest win the game with the three bonus scored, or win the game with points in all the squares (including the bonus ones)

El Cid: i think Fencer has already implemented that.

jessica: I missed that, because it didn't show on my recent achievements, and I'm allmost sure I have at least one of them I need to check them
Edit: They were even on the same game Póker de Dados Triplo (El Cid vs. Vasr)

El Cid: i think i saw them when you go to achievements then click on games and then dice poker.