BrainKing - 讨论板 (Politics)

监管者: Vikings

Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.

All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!

*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."

讨论板列表

状态: 所有人能发表

先显示最旧的消息。

12. 十一月 2009, 18:08:06

Übergeek 바둑이

显示此用户所有帖子 | 显示索引 | 链接

题目: Re:

被Übergeek 바둑이修改(12. 十一月 2009, 18:08:25)

Artful Dodger:

> In a Democracy, if you have a majority of "stupid people" then they can rule the minority.
> In a Republic, all voices can be heard. Even a minority can pass rulings over the objections
> of the majority. It's the reason a Republican form of government is better than a Democratic form.
> They differ in that one aspect.

Not all democracies are republics, and not all republics are democracies.

The UK is a democracy, but not a republic. The Soviet Union was made of republics, but they were not democracies. I think that you are referring to James Madison's definition of a republic as a representative democracy, in contrast to a direct democracy.

Well, we can edify ourselves if we have some patience to read:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic

One thing I will say, make sure you don't confuse republicanism with the Republican Party, and democracy with the Democratic Party. The names of those parties have little to do with the actual definition of republic or democracy.