Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
The Usurper:AGain, Bush has nothing to do with the question I was addressing. It had ONLY to do with Clinton. It's true that there was a Republican majority in Congress. It's true that they made it very difficult, if not impossible for Clinton to go against their will. They controlled the congress. He had to tailor things to suit them or nothing could get done. And it's also true that Clinton began the banking deregulation. He convinced the republicans to go along with him, and they did. They are at fault for this whole mess too. But as I said, the question I was addressing had only to do with Clinton. Bush isn't in the picture.