 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." 您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。 状态: 所有人能发表
20. 一月 2009, 00:08:56 题目: Back to media bias... 4 years ago the media were up in arms about Bush spending 40 million on his inauguration, listed all the better ways to spend the cash instead, this while the economy was doing well.... Anyone heard anything about that now when Obama is going to spend twice that amount, 80 million plus another 80 million in private funds, making the total 160 million dollar party???? Not a word (except for some pointing out the bias on conservative talk radio) but nobody is complaining, or even mentioning, in fact the media is falling all over itself, like proud parents! No..... no , the main stream media has no left wing bias or agenda.... no, not at all.... 20. 一月 2009, 02:16:20 题目: Re: Back to media bias... Tuesday: Everything costs more since Bush has been in office. I wonder how much is security. Obama has a mess to clean up. He deserves a huge party. ;) I know some of that was tongue in cheek, and you do empathize with what i am trying to point out... But its really true, we like Obama so he gets a pass and we dont like Bush so he gets screwed... but in all truth and honesty, is that really what you want from your media outlets???? 20. 一月 2009, 02:23:06 题目: Re: Back to media bias... Czuch: what is it excatly that all the money is being spent on for the event?? I heard that is was more expensive then Bush's BUT I honestly didn't hear what they said after that,I was just passing through...is it security??? just bells and whistles?? or both?? I dont feel ANY president incoming deserves to have THAT much money spent on one event. I also don't feel that every first lady should go through and COMPLETELY redecorate at the tax payers expense..thats just my opionion :) 20. 一月 2009, 02:32:44 题目: Re: Back to media bias... anastasia: yes it isd more expensive than Bushs, by 4 times, hardly the cost of inflation or security, yes half is paid from private donations, but if this really is the start of a new day, why not just have an 80 million dollar ball and not use any tax payers money? 20. 一月 2009, 01:29:44 题目: Re: Back to media bias..."4 years ago the media were up in arms about Bush spending 40 million on his inauguration" 被The Col修改(20. 一月 2009, 01:38:40) Czuch: Your post was almost a direct quote from The McCafferty File on CNN tonite.Do you consider CNN right wing? here's the link http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/ 20. 一月 2009, 01:58:40 题目: Re: Back to media bias..."4 years ago the media were up in arms about Bush spending 40 million on his inauguration"  Jim Dandy: ah ha........another CCP king ROFLMBO  20. 一月 2009, 02:30:20 题目: Re: Back to media bias..."4 years ago the media were up in arms about Bush spending 40 million on his inauguration" Jim Dandy: Well thanks for that blog, and it is nice to see... I dont know if that stuff made it to air or was just part of his blog..... the thing is, when it was Bush, it was the AP circulating this stuff...there is not one news room in the US (radio, tv, news paper etc) that does not subscribe to the AP news wires... not this time though, and to read some of the reader comments after the blog, it seems just the same ol same ol... if its Bush its bad, if its Obama its just money well spent on a mental health day required from the last 8 years! 20. 一月 2009, 03:06:03 题目: Re: Back to media bias..."4 years ago the media were up in arms about Bush spending 40 million on his inauguration" 被The Col修改(20. 一月 2009, 03:27:45) Czuch: I saw him discuss,and make the same points on air at around 5pm est.I searched CNN to find the The McCafferty File section and he discusses it on his blog also ABC has this report http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Inauguration/story?id=6665946&page=1 20. 一月 2009, 02:57:49 题目: Re: Back to media bias..."4 years ago the media were up in arms about Bush spending 40 million on his inauguration" Artful Dodger: and if they slobbered all over Bush you would be all in favor of them 20. 一月 2009, 03:40:21 题目: Re: Back to media bias..."4 years ago the media were up in arms about Bush spending 40 million on his inauguration" anastasia: and if they slobbered all over Bush you would be all in favor of them I dont think that is the point...if they didnt care about one inauguration price tag, then no complaints on this one either.... its about them not being biased... if I am a reporter, and I didnt make any reports about Bush spending too much, then i woulod be off the hook here too, but there are some reporters who made a stink about Bush at the time, who have all of a sudden lost their passion for frugal spending?????? Point is, they were Bush bashing, pure and simple, they didnt care about spending, it was just an excuse to bash.. they still dont give a crap about spending, and since there is no one they want to bash right now... there is no story. |
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
|
|
监管者: 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有 回顶端 |