 |
|
 EspionageFor all Espionage fans 您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。 状态: 所有人能发表
6. 十二月 2009, 20:51:39 题目: 3 vs Sab (Spy) in Open Taking the old Sab vs 2 debate a step further, I currently find myself in three games where I gave up a 3 for a Sab (Spy). All three were in extenuating circumstances (in each case I had already captured, or thought I had captured, three other spies) but I can't remember ever swapping a 3 for a Sab in a competitive game before. 6. 十二月 2009, 21:02:05 题目: Re: 3 vs Sab (Spy) in Open happy hermit: Hmmm, with you're playing style you can probably get away with it. Most of us don't. But if it's the last spy and I still have a lot of unknown pieces I think I might be tempted even to to sacrifice a 4 or 5 :) But ofcourse I like to bluff and do not like spies at all :) 7. 十二月 2009, 03:43:09 题目: Re: 3 vs Sab (Spy) in Open Chaos: I don't recommend trading a 3 for a Sab early in a game (while I do recommend trading a 2 for a Recon) as the opponent then has a lot of options in pursuing an attack. I just found it odd that I was playing three games simultaneously, against good players, in which I exchanged a 3 for a Sab so I thought I would mention it. :) 7. 十二月 2009, 03:55:04 题目: Re: 3 vs Sab (Spy) in Open  happy hermit: the sab is not the spy the recon is the spy... the original discussion was spy vs 2 7. 十二月 2009, 04:13:12 题目: Re: 3 vs Sab (Spy) in Open Nothingness: You are correct. I meant Recon and I fear I have been using the wrong word in several other places as well. :) 7. 十二月 2009, 04:15:10 题目: Re: 3 vs Sab (Spy) in Open happy hermit: actually here the names of the pieces are totally different then they are on IYT. i dont even know what there called here. |
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有 回顶端 |