Přihlašovací jméno: Heslo:
Registrace nového uživatele
Moderátor: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Seznam diskusních klubů
Mód: Každý může psát
Hledat v příspěvcích:  

27. září 2005, 02:16:43
Walter Montego 
Subjekt: I had this to say on the Backgammon board, but it applies to other games with luck in them too.
Změněno uživatelem Walter Montego (27. září 2005, 02:17:31)
It used to be when I played someone a game of Backgammon and we were within a few hundred points of each other in rating we'd be playing for 8 rating points. Now there's this sliding scale and I find it completely unfair to the higher rated player. I will never be able to play a higher rated player that cares about his rating on this site because how disadvantageous the odds are now. Someone that's 300 points above me risks 14 rating points to my 2! This is nowhere near the odds of my actual chance of winning. It may not 1 to 1, but it can't be 7 to 1.

Can we please have a ratings system for Backgammon that reflects the odds of winning and keeps in mind that there's luck involved? This disparity will further segegrate the Backgammon playing community or will encourage people to not play rated games at all. I can see having a big difference in the points awarded if we were playing a match to 10 wins or game points, but to have it like this for a single game is ridiculous.

Datum a čas
Přátelé on-line
Oblíbené kluby
Společenstva
Tip dne
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachůnek, všechna práva vyhrazena.
Zpět na vrchol