Username: Passwort:
Neue User - Registrierung
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Nachrichten pro Seite:
Liste der Diskussionsforen
Es ist Dir nicht erlaubt, Nachrichten in diesem Forum zu schreiben. Man muss dazu mindestens den Mitgliedsrang Brain Springer (Knight) haben!
Modus: Jeder kann schreiben
In Postings suchen:  

<< <   354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363   > >>
7. Feburar 2006, 19:01:50
Summertop 
Thema: Re:
nabla: Ah, that adds up...thanks.

7. Feburar 2006, 18:32:56
nabla 
Thema: Re:
Summertop: This is because it was a double round robin. *For each game you won* (as there was no draw), add the number of points of your opponent (that means, count twice the points of the opponents that you beated twice) and you will get 29.
Probably the explanations were thought with a simple round robin tournament in mind.

7. Feburar 2006, 18:31:44
alanback 
Thema: Re:
What counts is the total number of points earned by the opponents you beat. You and Uil had the same record except that you won both games from grafzahl while Uil went 1-1 against him; and Uil won both games from Seravajan, while you split with him. Grafzahl finished with 5 points, and Seravajan finished with 7. You earned 17 S-B points for your games against these two, while Uil earned 19 S-B points. That is why he has 2 more S-B points than you do.

7. Feburar 2006, 18:22:46
Summertop 
Thema: Re:
pauloaguia: Well, that's what I thought...Look at my Tournament.

ALL of the points add up to 30. Yet, Uil got a S-B score of 31 and I got 29. So again, I don't see what "points" are added up?

7. Feburar 2006, 18:18:54
pauloaguia 
Of course, it's not your points that matter, but the ones of the opponents you beat in the tournament. So, if you won those 3 games to opponents that ended up with 2, 3 and 4 points respectively and the draw was to a player who has 1 points, your final SB will be 2 + 3 + 4 + 1/2 = 9,5. Hope it's better explained now

7. Feburar 2006, 18:16:53
pauloaguia 
Thema: Re:
Summertop: The "points" are the points you end the tournament with. If you win 3 games and draw another, you'll have 3 and a half points. These are the points that are used to calculate SB score.

7. Feburar 2006, 18:15:33
alanback 
Thema: Re: Multi-game matches
Summertop: Just the game in progress.

7. Feburar 2006, 18:14:28
Summertop 
Thema: Multi-game matches
Another question...In Multi-Game matches such as Backgammon, when you resign, are you resigning the specific game or the entire match?

7. Feburar 2006, 18:12:26
Summertop 
Thema: Re:
harley: Yes and no...I understand the concept. But what "points" are added to get the actual S-B score? In my tournament, I didn't readily see anything that added up.

7. Feburar 2006, 17:47:40
harley 
In the FAQ's it says;

What does "S-B" column at tournament tables mean?

S-B is an abbreviation for Sonneborn-Berger system. It is used to specify an order of players with the same number of points and is based on a theory that points earned with a stronger opponent are more valuable than with a weaker one. The S-B value is a total sum of points of opponents who lost the tournament game with the player and half points of opponents who drawn the tournament game with the player. Only if two or more players have the same number of "normal" and S-B points, they share the same final order.

http://brainking.com/en/FAQ?ht=19

Hope that helps?

7. Feburar 2006, 17:37:10
Summertop 
Thema: Re: Tournaments...S-B
Summertop: Oh, wait...it has nothing to do with losses. He beat a higher ranked player. Whereas, I beat a lower ranked player. But then again, playing each other...didn't offset the other games. I would still like to know what "points" are added up, though.

7. Feburar 2006, 17:33:55
Summertop 
Thema: Tournaments...S-B
Can someone explain the Sonneborn-Berger system as implemented in Tournaments? It basically says it is the sum of points of the players that I beat (1/2 points if drawn). And, points earned with stronger players are more valuable than those from weaker players. What "points" are actually used to calculate it?

In the link provided for a tournament I am in, I and Uil tied in points. We played each other twice and split the games. Since he is ranked higher (better player), shouldn't I have I higher S-B score? Also, we each lost one more game. The opponent I lost too had a higher rating (better player) than the one Uil lost to. So again, shouldn't I have a higher S-B score? After that we each beat the same opponents... Uil, is a great player and I don't really care about the outcome. I would just like to know how it is calculated.

Maybe simplify...if we both beat every other player, but split the two games (we each won one). Who would have the higher S-B score? and why?

5. Feburar 2006, 19:10:07
Fencer 
Thema: Re: Brains - 30%
Bry: Only new memberships count. It means, your own renewal does not.

5. Feburar 2006, 19:09:00
Bry 
Thema: Re: Brains - 30%
Fencer: Can we receive Brains for our own membership renewals? - like a loyalty bonus?

I see that if a member who you referred initially renews, that doesn't count, but what about our own renewal?

5. Feburar 2006, 17:36:30
rabbitoid 
Thema: Re: Brains - 30%
Fencer: That, I always knew!

5. Feburar 2006, 17:25:16
Fencer 
Thema: Re: Brains - 30%
Bry: No. What you buy, you get. It's up to you how you use it. You can spend Brains to extend your membership or purchase a membership for another user. You can save them for a later use. Or you can pay a tournament entry fee with them and hope you will be one of the winners and win a thousand or two. But, as I always say, it's just an option and everyone can use all advantages and features of BrainKing without any Brains.

5. Feburar 2006, 17:12:22
Bry 
Thema: Re: Brains - 30%
Fencer: So, in theory, if I buy 150 Brains at 5 Euro, I am only actually buying 105 Brains for 5 Euro, because 30% of them will "disappear" if I use them?

5. Feburar 2006, 17:07:32
Fencer 
Thema: Re: Tournament rake.
playBunny: Yes.

5. Feburar 2006, 17:05:48
playBunny 
Thema: Re: Tournament rake.
Fencer: That' a bit unclear but it sounds as if you're saying the 30% becomes yours.

5. Feburar 2006, 12:41:47
Fencer 
Thema: Re: Fencer
Bry: The 30% goes nowhere. In other words, it remains on the BrainKing account.

5. Feburar 2006, 12:36:26
Bry 
Thema: Fencer
In a tournament where you use Brains to enter..... why is the maximum prize fund of Brains only 70% of the amount used to enter?

Why are 100% of Brains used to enter used in the prize fund?

Where does the other 30% go?, bearing in mind people may have paid money to purchase them to be used in a tournament.

5. Feburar 2006, 08:11:25
Fencer 
Thema: Re: Eternal memberships
Czuch Chuckers: Heh heh. Very funny.

5. Feburar 2006, 02:45:09
Adaptable Ali 
Thema: Re: Eternal memberships
Czuch Chuckers:

5. Feburar 2006, 02:40:27
Czuch 
Thema: Re: Eternal memberships
Fencer: So can we pass these on to our children as well, in our will?

4. Feburar 2006, 18:25:08
furbster 
i didn't read it properly and thought the bonus was 3 days and not 3 hours lol

4. Feburar 2006, 18:12:11
Mary Jo 
Thema: Re: question about time outs...
Thank you playBunny, Vikings, Pedro Martinez, Pythagoras, and fubster! I have had trouble understanding this but with all your versions of explaning it, I think I finally get it! :) I appreciate your help! I have to do some reevaluating of those tournaments I sign up for when I'm needing to do silly things like SLEEP! lol

4. Feburar 2006, 18:00:54
playBunny 
Thema: Re: Time controls - Time per Game
Mary Jo: In that kind of game the 1 day is the total amount of time in which you can play moves. Let's ignore the bonuses for now and just imagine a couple of those sand-filled timers. There's one for each player. If the sand runs out then that player lose the match. Unlike the ordinary sand timers, though, these ones don't get turned over. Rather they get switched on and off. Yours is losing sand all the time that it's your turn. When you move yours stops and your opponent's starts losing sand. So, there's not a heap of sand per move but for the whole game.

Now let's consider the bonuses. This has the efect of topping up your sand each time you move, by 3 hours-worth in this case.

Looking at your game it says that you played 9 moves. Your timer will have lost the sand between each move - the period from when your opponent moved to when you did. If you add all that time up then that's more sand than there was available.

So how much sand did you have? 24 hours (the initial 1 day) plus 9 bonuses of 3 hours, giving 51 hours in total. At the point that your opponent made his last move you must have had only 4.5 hours of sand left .. and hence the timeout.

4. Feburar 2006, 17:52:15
Vikings 
Thema: Re: question about time outs...
Mary Jo: it is using a fisher clock which means that you have 1 day total to play the whole game with a 3 hour bonus, to make it simple for example if you wait 8 hours to make your move you would have 16 hours left plus 3 hours for your bonus for a total of 19 hours to make your next move, if you wait 5 hours when it is your next turn to move you ould have 14 hours left plus 3 for a total of 17 hours to make your next turn,. these games can catch up with you when you have to work or sleep so its a good idea to play these games first when you are on-line to add up the bonus time

4. Feburar 2006, 17:50:22
Pedro Martínez 
Thema: Re: question about time outs...
Mary Jo: If you moved 1.5 hours before the "deadline" on your last move, you had only 4.5 hours left after your opponent moved. If you moved in the last second before you'd time out, you'd have only 3 hours for your next move. I think it's quite simple.

4. Feburar 2006, 17:48:01
Chicago Bulls 
Thema: Re: question about time outs...
Verändert von Chicago Bulls (4. Feburar 2006, 17:49:31)
Mary Jo:
When a game has:
Time for game : Time: 1 day, Bonus: 3 hours, Limit: 10 days, no days off

Then it means that:
You have 1 day = 24hours to play the whole game and not the move.
That means: if your opponent plays a move and then 2 hours later you play your response, you will then have 24-2 = 22 hours to play the game.
If your opponent makes another move later and you play after 8 hours(from his response), then you will have 22-8 = 14 hours left to play the whole game.

But that with bonus = 0. With bonus = 3 hours like here, after your move you will have 3 hours added to your time left for the whole game....

Limit = 10 days, just declares that if you play many moves quickly and the bonus is not 0, so your time for the whole game increases, this value can't go above 10 days....

The same exists for your opponent of course.

4. Feburar 2006, 17:44:28
furbster 
Thema: Re: question about time outs...
Mary Jo: I'm finding it difficult to keep up in this set of tournements too. You have one day to start with and 3 hours gets added on if you move within a certain time. but its not necessarily one day a move as i found out lol.

4. Feburar 2006, 17:36:21
Mary Jo 
Thema: question about time outs...
Verändert von Mary Jo (4. Feburar 2006, 17:36:49)
Hi, I can't seem to understand the whole time out thing on games.... in this game....

http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGame?g=1363114

it's a game that has a 1 day time limit. I last played on 2/3 @ 1748 and my opponent played 2/4 @ 0237....then I got a message that I lost my game and timed out on 2/4 @ 0709. That was only about 13.5 hours since my last move and only 4.5 hours since my opponents last move. What am I not understanding here? lol Help!

4. Feburar 2006, 12:12:05
Fencer 
Thema: Eternal memberships
... have been added to the Paid Membership page.

4. Feburar 2006, 01:56:00
Eriisa 
Thema: Re:
Stevie: ROFL!!!!

I was thinking that as I posted it.

4. Feburar 2006, 01:53:02
Stevie 
Thema: Re:
Eriisa: Sorry Globlady, I cant say,, harley will tell me off for being off topic hehe

4. Feburar 2006, 01:52:24
alanback 
Thema: Re:
Eriisa: I understood "bottoms"

4. Feburar 2006, 01:50:38
harley 
Thema: Re:
Stevie: You wish

4. Feburar 2006, 01:50:24
Eriisa 
botties......... hmmmmmm


somebody care to translate that into American English...

bottles or booty

4. Feburar 2006, 01:48:12
Stevie 
Thema: Re:
Pythagoras: I think we had our wrists slapped hehe we better dissapear afore we get our botties smacked next

4. Feburar 2006, 01:47:13
harley 
Thema: Re:
Stevie:

4. Feburar 2006, 01:47:01
Chicago Bulls 
Thema: Re:
harley: I didn't start it but i continue it.....
Sorry Harley

4. Feburar 2006, 01:46:04
Stevie 
Thema: Re:
harley: hands up... "sorry miss" i stopped

4. Feburar 2006, 01:44:16
harley 
Pythagoras & Stevie:

4. Feburar 2006, 01:39:05
Chicago Bulls 
Thema: Re:
Verändert von Chicago Bulls (4. Feburar 2006, 01:39:33)
Stevie: It was just the Reversi games! If you have another case or even sign or even any other small evidence then just give it or stop throwing things in the air....! But i don't care anyway if you accuse me or not because i know the truth and i only care about non-weakies statements....

4. Feburar 2006, 01:33:34
Stevie 
Thema: Re:
Pythagoras: its ok, was just checking who you were.... wasnt just the reversi games was it LOL

Anyways,, back to the subject in question now please

4. Feburar 2006, 01:31:32
Chicago Bulls 
Thema: Re:
Verändert von Chicago Bulls (4. Feburar 2006, 01:32:20)
Stevie: No, i used my program at Reversi 8x8 because i was beta testing it.....You can't just understand/believe it right?

After the game you said: Do you use Zebra?
I replied: No i use my own written program that is trying to solve the game with 28, bla,bla,bla....
Do you think that, i would tell you that if i wanted to cheat? Also i proposed you and Fencer to delete my game against you and actually against all my other opponents.....
Once again my honesty(by telling you the truth) had the opposite result as i expected.....

4. Feburar 2006, 01:29:21
ScarletRose 
Thema: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Oh well.. now you are just like us lowly's of the site..

We can all talk to you again.. haha

4. Feburar 2006, 01:27:37
Pedro Martínez 
Thema: Re:
ScarletRose: Nah, just 4.5 months...:)

4. Feburar 2006, 01:24:41
Stevie 
Thema: Re:
Pythagoras: for sure, and Im sure Filip would get more people willing to fork out 280euro for that black/gold topped rook than would fork out for a maharajah..... especially as neither gives you anything extra other than a diferent iconic status..

BTW, aint you the guy who used programmes cos you didnt like to lose?

4. Feburar 2006, 01:21:10
ScarletRose 
Thema: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Wow.. you went back to just a rook.. I thought you had a full year??

<< <   354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363   > >>
Datum und Zeit
Freunde Online
Abonnierte Foren
Vereine
Tip des Tages
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Zurück nach oben