The best way to tell if someone is as good as his her rating is to find evidence of results in an environment where cheating is not possible and where such a rating isn't flattering. An environment such as over the board play. On here I consider my rating to be a little flattering.
What evidence is there of blaickner's over the board standard when she does not appear on European rating list.
I asked Blaickner earlier about representing Austria in the World Championships for which I got no reply. With no Austrian national championships, she would clearly be eligible to participate in such an event.
As Blaickner has not played in any over the board tournament and she also shows reluctance to participate in any such competition.
Gary, if you got thrashed at Pente by someone you had never heard of, had never played in an over the board tournament (and was reluctant to do so), had a near perfect record, and whose majority of moves matched that of a strong program (which has spotted moves top players miss) - wouldn't you be suspicious that your opponent was cheating?
And to answer Blaickner's question - by setting the time to one minute or less. A strong program (even at small depth) will produce good moves at speed without a user having to waste seconds thinking up one.
(verstecken) Du kannst Freunden Mitteilungen mit nur einem klick senden indem du den kleinen Briefumschlag neben deren Namen anklickst. (pauloaguia) (zeige alle Tips)