Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.
All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..
As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.
Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!
*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."
Thema: Re:Legalization of "softer" drugs has worked in other countries, but politically unacceptable in many places.
Verändert von Übergeek 바둑이 (22. Oktober 2009, 04:56:27)
Czuch:
> I dont mind it as a prescribed drug, I am sure it much safer than many other prescribed drugs, > and others that are legal too. but I dont want you and me growing it and selling legally to someone > with a prescription either.
I think this will always be a problem with recreational drugs. Alcohol is available to anyone over 18 (or 21, depending on where you live). The same is true with tobacco.
I think that people should get an alcohol consumer license. If people drink responsibly, then they have earned the right to enjoy their alcohol. If somebody is found driving or operating machinery under the influence of alcohol, or causing a domestic disturbance, or falling into addiction (alcoholism), then they should lose their alcohol license temporarily or permanently depending on the case. We have this with driving licenses and drunk drivers lose their licenses, but not their ability to buy alcohol. If a person has no alcohol license, then it would be illegal for them to purchase products containing alcohol. A similar license then could be in place for other substances, like tobacco, marihuana, etc. Of course there would be great opposition to this from breweries, distilleries, vineyard owners, etc. Controlling the product they sell is not in their best interest.
Marihuana as a prescription drug would probably be like other prescription drugs that are abused for reasons other than the medically prescribed reason. A good example is insulin. If you are a diabetic your life depends on insulin injections and proper control of dosages and timing of the injections. This is the medically correct way to use insulin. If you are not diabetic, does it make sense to take insulin? Of course not, because it is dangerous and it could potentially kill you. However, there are people who abuse insulin. Bodybuilders inject themselves with insulin in the hopes of forcing nutrients into their muscle cells so that their muscles can grow bigger. It is a common practice in bodybuilding and some of the people who abuse insulin this way build big muscles at the expense of serious health problems later in life. It is not illegal to possess insulin. I never heard of anyone going to jail for having insulin vials in their possession.
Marihuana as a prescription drug would probably be the same. People who need to take advantage of its analgesic and atininflammatory effects will use it for medically correct reasons. Then there will be those who will abuse it as a recreational drug. The government can try to control the supply of any drug, but when people are determined to use and abuse a drug there is nothing the government can do, whether that drug is legal or not.