BrainKing - Diskussionsforen (Feature requests)

Moderator: rod03801

Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html

Liste der Diskussionsforen
Es ist Dir nicht erlaubt, Nachrichten in diesem Forum zu schreiben. Man muss dazu mindestens den Mitgliedsrang Brain Springer (Knight) haben!

Modus: Jeder kann schreiben

31. Juli 2003, 20:06:30

danoschek

zeige Postings dieses Users | zeige Thema | Link

Thema: beyond doubts

is a manner of defining.

both chess games I have lost were won beyond doubts.

nice quiz btw what happened there ... :D

I don't know anyway which game-type was targeted in particular
but I hardly could imagine it as an acceptable treating ...

an umpire would be required with highest possible own skills, for each type,
and would not be that player also a competitor for the players he has to judge ?

thin ice. ~*~

31. Juli 2003, 20:19:34

grenv

zeige Postings dieses Users | zeige Thema | Link

Thema: Re: beyond doubts

I actually meant beyond mathematical doubt. Example would be backgammon, where one player could roll 2-1 and his or her opponent could roll 6-6 for the rest of the game and would still win. In chess I wouldn't recommend this approach.