Username: Passwort:
Neue User - Registrierung
Moderator: Vikings 
 Run around the Pond

Discuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game)

Game link..... Ponds
Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings
Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only)


Nachrichten pro Seite:
Liste der Diskussionsforen
Es ist Dir nicht erlaubt, Nachrichten in diesem Forum zu schreiben. Man muss dazu mindestens den Mitgliedsrang Brain Bauer (Pawn) haben!
Modus: Jeder kann schreiben
In Postings suchen:  

31. Januar 2007, 23:49:14
Rose 
lol what ever you say.. it is still a form of cheating

31. Januar 2007, 23:51:10
Vikings 
Thema: Re:
Rose: According to fencer it is not

13. Feburar 2007, 17:00:15
joshi tm 
Thema: Re:
Rose: Yes this play is not correct. So my suggestion is when a bid is way lower than the lowest bid in the last round (say 200 pts), if this is not almost all they have (say, max 2000 pts left), this bid doesn't count as the lowest (while falling in), the next player with the lowest bid falls also in, and so on till a player ''succeeds'' for these criteria.
This way stops that advantagous playing Viking told about, for me that is called CHEATING.

14. Feburar 2007, 00:04:00
Vikings 
Thema: Re:
joshi tm: under your criterea, AlanP's bid in this pond http://brainking.com/en/Pond?bms=21&g=2875 would be considered cheating when in fact it was a good and gutsy bid,there was a logic to the bid that only he followed, yet you would have him punnished by falling in? these bids happen in many games

14. Feburar 2007, 06:27:33
joshi tm 
Thema: Re:
Vikings: No, because FANTAS had the lowest bid of 53 (after bidding everything he has), and in that round he has the lowest inside the criteria. so 200 under the last bid of FANTAS would be -147, and is all fair again.

14. Feburar 2007, 12:01:22
Vikings 
Thema: Re:
joshi tm< I'm talking about the current round, where Brian fell in with a 598, Alan stayed in with 667 and the next closest bid was backoff with a 1222. so it fits your criteria of the next lowest bid being 200 points lower than the next (595 in this case).

14. Feburar 2007, 15:10:54
joshi tm 
Thema: Re:
Vikings: Sorry for confusing you, but I meant the lowest bid of round 21 (enderme's 441). Backoff's lowest bid was 595, that's above the criterium of 200.

14. Feburar 2007, 23:29:32
Vikings 
Thema: Re:
joshi tm: I see what you mean, there are people that bid higher in the first round and then lower in later rounds., and there are people who will bid smaller toward the end but not nessecarrily with less than 2000 points left, pawns cause some of this bidding also. I guess that I don't see being observant the same as cheating.

Datum und Zeit
Freunde Online
Abonnierte Foren
Vereine
Tip des Tages
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Zurück nach oben