Übergeek 바둑이: It must be a "sign of the times", but what we have read about teenagers in other parts of the world for so long now seems to be happening in Australia....perhaps it is worse when it happens "in our own backyard"


***and thanks for editing the link***

In case the link below does not work for some of you:
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25817632-2862,00.html

Apparently the problem of cyberbullying has been on the increase in some Australian high schools. I think that in cases where victims are driven to suicide the bullying has been going on for long periods of time and outside of the Internet. The Internet seems to become an aggravating factor and ity is used as a further avenue to victimize those already being bullied in schools.

It seems that the government in Australia is studying the problem and trying to help parents and teachers identify the problem. In one of the stories in that same newspaper it said that teens were using Facebook as a way to bully other children and as a way to spread malicious gossip against their teachers.

I think the only way to deal with this is for parents to pay close attention to what their kids do online. I see no other way to prevent this because once kids are out of school their actions are beyond the control of their teachers.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25817632-2862,00.html

here is the link ....I didnt realise that 4 teenagers from the same school had committed hari-kari.....so sad.

Übergeek 바둑이: so much for parental guidance.

Übergeek 바둑이: she was bullied via the internet and also her school from what I can see.....I will try and find a link.

Bernice:
Do you have a link that might give more details? I am wondering if she was also being bullied in school or in her neighborhood.

We know that in the Internet there is as much if not worse predatory behaviour than there is outside the Internet. Anonimity can provide bullies with a way to shield their actions.

I am curious because if she was being bullied, would just stop using the Internet be easier than suicide? Obviously there were other factors involved besides bullying. I imagine that maybe she was suffering from depression, or she felt that there was no adult she could turn to for help.

As with many cases of bullying, it probably was done by one of her peers. It is probably why she felt it was so devastating. It is quite likely that the problem spread outside just the Internet. Kids who commit suicide because of bullying are often being victimized by several people and in a way that humiliates them physically and emotionally before their peers.

I think that the government would have a hard time regulating this. In a school or neighborhood a bully can potentially be charged with assault, but in the Internet a defense lawyer would simply argue that the girl should just have stopped logging in. As with other forms of bullying, educating children on not doing it and on defending themselves from bullies is probably the only thing the government could do.

what do you think of "cyber bullying?"

A 14 yo school girl committed suicide last friday night after being bullied on the internet.....the Govt. is now investigating what can be done about "bullying" on the internet.

**I'm sorry about bringing it here but couldnt think of anywhere else it would be accepted"**

(V): Thanks man. You know I like these islands northwest of here :)

gogul: http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/

Here you are.

(V): It was a single dude who made that pressure possible, don't forget that. I'm happy with it.

(V): Now you can even access complete records dating back to the 100 years war, thanks to the UK government of the time wanting to know where their money was being spent.

Interesting. Link please?

The memory of this very board tells that Switzerland is stuck with apartheid. Many work on it

gogul: Only because of international pressure on Swiss banks, as the previous conditions to make a claim were at the least.. scandalous. How could death certificates of those killed in the holocaust be produced??

And shamefully, the Swiss, like the UK turned away many Jews trying to flee to a neutral country (or non-Nazi influenced) to escaped being killed.

History is such a depositary of info!!
Now you can even access complete records dating back to the 100 years war, thanks to the UK government of the time wanting to know where their money was being spent.

It seems that we don't have new books about redindian history. I been told they'll come after a certain numbers of the multimillion trials going on done.

I don't have to talk about ch and wwII. Google Bergier commission.

gogul: illegal drugs or legal drugs?? Legal drugs are worth more then the illegal sort by I would guess quite a factor. And didn't you know.. much of the business in one class has become home grown.

And what about the Swiss banks and a certain organisations gold from WWII.. To which several lawsuits have been raised against Swiss banks

We have a good memory here also.

Ferris Bueller:   Its actually a tribute to the man that he had far left leanings but one never knew that based on his professional reporting.   He reported the news.   He was probably the last of an era of the kind of reporters that we need in this world.   Contrast him with Dan Rather.  Rather wore his politics on his sleeve.

But just read what WC said after his retirement and its clear that he was a far left leaning guy.   I think his ideas are dangerous for all of us.  People who think like him need to be defeated in the battle for ideas. 

One only needs to read the many things he said to discover that he leaned very far left.

Women rights in Libya? Women genital cutting, young girls married to old men, abuse, the daughters and mothers the possession of men? If al-Gaddafi knew about these things, he even could change it, don't he?

(V): Just a matter of outlandish correspondents.

http://www.seitenstark.de/em2008/bilder/wappen/wappen-gross-schweiz.gif

(V): Gibraltar? Drugs, human trafficking, spain italian north african and london/madrd mafia bundled in 50'000 offshore companies. It's drugs that govern the big business deal. Don't you tell me you didn't know that. We have good memory over here, and the London financesuck and british governance, it's too easy to ground it.

gogul: But it's already in place via business deals. Long gone are the days where a country's economy is strictly controlled by those who live there.

Artful Dodger: So.. the site "Accuracy in Media" is against common decency?? Even against stopping discrimination against women!!

And I must say.. The USA expects extradition to it's country and courts and yet this site does not want fairness in cases where USA people have committed crimes in other countries and hence extradition.

Bit of a joke site by all accounts!!

Artful Dodger:  So!  He joined some "liberal" organizations following his retirement.  That makes him an evil man in the eyes of arch-conservatives & organizations like AIM.  Can you even substantiate half the stuff in this right-wing commentary anywhere else other than such biased musings?

I can tell where culture has gone, there where it is missing. It went to the museum, to the laboratory and to the prisons of the mighty, be it their own homes, or the ones of the police. I'm waiting for the police u-turn my friends.

Artful Dodger: Why struggle people our days. Ya got to know when it's time for hara-kiri.

The alternative to the UN is culture.

gogul: Makes the French Revolution and understandable event.

Artful Dodger: All at once!

gogul:   It's all about money and power and the rich.  Off with their heads.

Artful Dodger: A world goverment. People who support that idea are dumb. Ergo, a world government would be dumb. The EU, the UN, that is like the tower of babel. A total nonsence for people who in fact are unbearable. A little mediadance, and they seem to look nice, and because we too are sooooo dumb we even start to believe it, don't we? Thank you sooooooo much for saving us dear UN, Ha the tv told me how great your work is, you save lives in Africa! Boah, fantastic!

The Terrible Truth About Walter Cronkite

You won't hear about this on the evening news.  Even Fox news screwed this up. 

Artful Dodger: If they didn't then they really forgot one great deal of a lot of the dynamic history of Iraq. Seeing as it wasn't that far in the past I find that hard to believe. I feel more they just hoped the old internal wars were forgotten about.

Übergeek 바둑이: I find it hard to believe that the 5% was not accounted for. So much 'watching' by various parties that for them not to know does suggest it was known.. or at least highly known to be unlikely.

If not... then despite various 'sightings' of mobile chemical factories (as was claimed) the intel was very, very poor. Stupendously bad in fact for the amount of effort being made. And since a certain C Rice interview over Saddam... I don't recon it was that bad, seeing as she had to give such a performance.

Czuch: I cannot say that, too much politics involving western nations and Arab states to say that without considerable error elements.

... too many fingers in the pie.. as it were

Übergeek 바둑이: The missing WMDs never bothered me as there could be many reasons for that. But the following has caused me to lose a bit of heart over the matter.

"A lack of a proper exit strategy, together with a total lack of vision with regards to iraqs internal ethnic makeup, led to sectarian violence and insurgency.

Dubious business connections, conflicts of interest, corruption in reconstruction efforts and other questionable business connections have made a lot of people question the motivation behind the war."

clearly the US did not fully appreciate the dynamics of Muslims in that part of the world.

People in power should never have a voice in policies when there's even a hint of a conflict of interest. It seems that conflicts of interest are the norm in politics. Cap and Trade is a good example of this. Many in power will make a great deal of money with cap and trade and yet they are allowed to have a voice in policy. That's never a good thing.

Czuch:

> Its just that many people, myself included, believe that those numbers pale
> in comparison to the death toll had nothing been done....

I agree with you in this. I think there are few people out there who will think that Saddam Hussain was harmless. He was dangerous, not to the US, but to his neighbors and to the Iraqi people.

I know that on the surface it might seem that I am constantly pointing the finger at the US. In reality I see the war in Iraq as a continuation of the same political and economic conditions that have determined human history going back to antiquity and ancient empires.

I think the big difference between the war in Iraq and other wars is that this war was fought in the public eye through telesion, the Internet and other means of communication.

We question the motivation of the war because many details of foreign policy, business interests and military intelligence became visible to the public.

The Bush administration chose to fight the war in the public eye and to mount a massive propaganda campaign aimed at convincing the American public and the world that the war was justified. I think the Bush administration made two mistakes in the public relations campaign preceding the war:

First, they chose to believe faulty (or manufactured?) intelligence that could not be corroborated before the war.

Second, they lost patience with the UN's lack of decisiveness and resolve.

If the Bush administration had chosen its intelligence more carefully and allowed the UN to come around and support the war, then the public view of the war would be different.

The Bush administration gambled that WMDs were there and that once Saddam was defeated the WMDs would be found and the war would be fully justified. They called Saddam's bluff, and then found themselves with no evidence of WMDs.

A lack of a proper exit strategy, together with a total lack of vision with regards to iraqs internal ethnic makeup, led to sectarian violence and insurgency.

Dubious business connections, conflicts of interest, corruption in reconstruction efforts and other questionable business connections have made a lot of people question the motivation behind the war.

The honest truth is that I personally have mixed feelings about it. Saddam was an early ally, and later a mortal enemy of the US. Lots of people have died, been wounded, become homeless, etc. Those things make me see the war (and every other war) as a bad thing, but removing Saddam was certainly the right thing to do.

(V):

> And to why Saddam didn't want inspectors...

We have to remember that Saddam Hussain did allow UN inspectors into Iraq. Initially UNSCOM did the inspections and oversaw the destruction of biological weapon manufacturing facilities:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Special_Commission

UNSCOM was disbanded in 1999 and replaced with UNMOVIC:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Monitoring,_Verification_and_Inspection_Commission

Although UNMOVIC had confirmed that Iraq had dismantled all WMD facilities and destroyed its arsenal, the Bush administration went ahead with the war.

Scott Ritter and David Kay (both prominent weapons inpectors in Iraq) refuted the existence of WMDs after 1998, while Hans Blix was ambigous in his assesment of Iraq's WMD capabilities.

Iraq did allow inspectors and complied with UN resolutions, but what really caused a problem was Iraq's inability to account for about 5% of its WMDs. It was that unaccounted 5%, and faulty intelligence that led to the war.

(V): Well, you admit that Saddam didnt want inspectors, and it is true that he did many things to stall and delay etc.... for whatever reason, and thats where many of the UN sanctions came from...

Übergeek 바둑이: Those are not deaths caused directly by violence, but as a result of the war.




Its just that many people, myself included, believe that those numbers pale in comparison to the death toll had nothing been done....

Czuch:

> Maybe you will tell us? I dont believe that the civilian toll dead at the direct hands of
> US military(coalition of the willing) is as high as you might believe.

The issue of the death count in Iraq is highly dependant on who did the counting and how. Estimates of deaths range from about 100,000 to 650,000. I recommend looking at the article in Wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_conflict_in_Iraq_since_2003

In 2006 The Lancet, a famous medical journal, published a peer-reviewed statistical analysis of the mortality rate in Iraq and came with a number of 654, 996 total deaths caused by the war. 601,027 were due to violence. 31% of those were done by the Coalition. That would be about 200,000 civilians killed by the Coalition.

Other surveys like the Iraq Body Count estimate a more conservative number of about 100,000. Other surveys push the number as high as 1,000,000 people. The problem is that few deaths are officially recorded, and many deaths are difficult to attribute to Coalition forces, the new Iraqi security forces and sectarian violence.

I tried to find surveys done by the US Department of Defense but so far I have not found any official estimates. If somebody can find them it would be interesting to compare them.

The dead are not the only casualties of the war. There people who are wounded, left disabled. psychologically traumatized, homeless, impoverished, etc. Those people are often ignored. The dead are one aspect of a war. The living who suffer are another aspect, and most people seem to ignore that too. I have idea of how many people have died as a result of hospitals being destroyed, lack of medicines, lack of food, lack of clean water, homelessness, disease, etc. If those people were included in the death toll, then the numbers jump to well over one million. Those are not deaths caused directly by violence, but as a result of the war.

Czuch: No it isn't.

(V): And to why Saddam didn't want inspectors... because the country's army was so weak that he didn't want the Iranians knowing fearing an invasion. I guess the USA knew that seeing as he was such an easy quick victory. Yet all that man power tied up there is a shame as it limits the efforts in Afghanistan.




Well this is a turn in your stance that there were inspectors that concluded no WMDs? It is too bad for to waste all that man power as well, I agree. I wonder why the borders was not sealed off immediately, but I guess that is easier said than done.

gogul: History is told by survivors of it, so naturally most history has it's ugliness when it comes to power, politics and the ilk. As for the horizon museum pieces.. no. it's a matter of the Taliban out lasting... they know they are no match for us in the battlefield.

And politics in the middle east involves more than the Israeli/Palestinian problem. Religion, cold war and much separatist division. Those who study history would be wise to remember that before Saddam Iraq was torn by civil war, he gave stability to that country, but power and being used by various factions in their 'best' interest power corrupted him and his regime. Billions of dollars fed into his economy so no-one else would have to dirty their hands with blood.

And to why Saddam didn't want inspectors... because the country's army was so weak that he didn't want the Iranians knowing fearing an invasion. I guess the USA knew that seeing as he was such an easy quick victory. Yet all that man power tied up there is a shame as it limits the efforts in Afghanistan.

No proceeding within seven hours. ok. Netanjahu is leading Israel to the abyss. It is important that Achmedinejadus and Hamas kinds (anti Jews everywhere) get concious that they are torches of infamy. Some persons, also some Swiss in particular, on this globe are at place to do the job face to face. It can not be anymore that the Israel and Palestinian establishments let policies be managed by incompetents. These are the FUNNY sides of democracy now.

The Jews didn't conquer Israel. The wizards should rethink their attitude about Joshua :)~

gogul: wonders if in the middle east there are some people left who can handle some 50-60 years of history.

Czuch: Its a bit like the Israeli/Palestine conflict. The solution is written in just some decades of history, but the boys there prefer to fight.

(V): Can you swap the perspective? One column was dead then came the next, this was dead too then came the next column and on and on. Wasn't that somehow satisfying. Come on, do it for us, just once!

gogul: Uuuuh duck, British columns at the horizon lmao

(V): Oh I forgot, Britain has nothing to sacrifice anymore exept some shameful gifts from the museum.

(V): Did you miss the videos of the British servicemen lately? Ugly stuff. British politics hide behind every bush they can find. Aren't you best positioned suggest some British sacrifices pending? British history is horrible next to the US, and it's British intollerance that made the start of the US worse :)

Czuch: look again, the western involvement goes upto 1990 there about's, and to vivify your position it would be helpful if you verify your knowledge.