Brugernavn: Kodeord:
Ny bruger registrering
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Meddelelser per side:
Liste over diskussionsborde
Du har ikke rettigheder til at skrive meddelelser til dette bord, Mindste medlemsskabsniveau nødvendigt for at skrive til dette bord er BrainBonde.
Tilstand: Alle kan skrive
Søg i meddelelser:  

5. Marts 2009, 02:17:21
Papa Zoom 
Take your pick.  Most of your posts contain a




or two. 

5. Marts 2009, 02:34:15
The Usurper 
Emne: Re:
Artful Dodger: A wicker man? The original flick (1974) is really pretty good. :o)

5. Marts 2009, 02:38:36
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re:
The Usurper:Seriously you jest.

5. Marts 2009, 02:40:04
The Usurper 
Emne: Re:
Artful Dodger: I jest seriously. There's a difference. Just don't ask me to explain it.

5. Marts 2009, 02:41:59
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re:
The Usurper:Next time I'll use this



so there's less confusion.

5. Marts 2009, 03:02:50
The Usurper 
Emne: Re:
Artful Dodger: I read your exchange below with (V) so wasn't really confused. But my response just seemed so appropriate...lol

5. Marts 2009, 03:05:05
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re:
The Usurper: That's fine. I have fixed the problem with a new pic and and explanation. Just so there's no more confusion.

5. Marts 2009, 03:45:37
The Usurper 
Emne: Re:
Artful Dodger: Now I'm doubly confused. I'm afraid you'll have to put the two pics side by side and explain more fully. Preferably you'll back up your explanation with evidence & links to the source. I still believe those are Wicker Men!

Just an aside....if the arguments are straw men, in what way are they so? Ought a picture really to be considered a thorough refutation? I mean, I know that works for O'Reilly & Hannity, but come on... :o)

5. Marts 2009, 04:13:13
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re:
The Usurper: Clearly you know what a strawman is? If so, then you understand that there is no refutation required on my part. If someone refutes and argument I'm not making, all I need to do is point that out. If then, they insist that I am making that argument, I can ignore them. The onus is upon the other to show I have actually said what they say I've said. The smart thing of course, is to ask for clarification, instead of building a straw man and then blowing over.

If I say, "I'm against gun control."

and you say, "Oh. So you're in favor of criminals murdering innocent citizens then."

you get one of these:

Strawman  Your argument didn't address my own, but nice try.  


no refutation is needed as your argument speaks for itself

5. Marts 2009, 04:29:23
The Usurper 
Emne: Re:
Artful Dodger: Actually, I must confess I wasn't following the argument to which your straw man was a reply. A bit befuddled & off-focus. I was mostly just teasing.....

About MSNBC....you are correct. Likewise, Fox News is the Bush channel.

5. Marts 2009, 04:32:53
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re:
The Usurper:I don't agree with your Fox analysis.  I've seen Bush's policies smacked around plenty.  O'Reilly routinely criticized his administration for the blunders in Iraq.

Dato og klokkeslæt
Venner online
Favoritborde
Sammenslutninger
Dagens tip
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Tilbage til toppen