BIG BAD WOLF: i love the option as well .. i still receive messages from all fellowships .. i havent turned them off .. but before my holiday i will so i wont be flooded when i come back

my message box is meant for private messages mainly .. although, because i am online often enough, i dont mind the fs messages that much .. as long it wont be too much ..

sometimes they are useful .. for example when i am looking for a new tournament :)
but at the moment i am trying to have only a few games left when i go on holiday so i am not looking for new tournaments to join :)

its a great option .. its great because its an option (which can be on or off ;))

King Reza: Ok, thank you

Pbarb2: Are you talking about the option of "Receive group messages from the Big Boss" that you can turn on/off in a fellowship?

If so, I love this option. As a person who reads most of the discussion boards in the fellowships, one of my BIGGEST annoyances is when a BIG BOSS will send out a message to everyone, then I go and read the same exact message in the fellowship boards.

I know the option to send out a message to everyone is very helpful since not everyone reads the fellowship boards, but for someone like me - I love this option. (I have even left fellowships in the past where the BIG BOSS would send out 2-4 messages a day to everyone in the group).

But the default option is to reviece messages, so hopefully to the ones who do not read the boards - they will never know this option is there so will not turn it off.

Stevie: Uh oh! Now I'm sure to be moderated...

I am wondering why.. to receive messages from different fellowships.. was added. If someone belongs to a fellowship..They uncheck that..Then why are they in that fellowship? They get nothing when games are started..Most don't visit the fellowships ..That is the only way of contact.
I noticed in many fellowships it is hard to get people to play the games. They don't get our messages. We put a lot of work into our fellowships.

Summertop: Baddessi is a "she" ;) :P

Summertop: No worries. It has been brought up with Fencer and the globals. Someone new will be added soon.

So...I just checked. Harley hasn't been on for several weeks. Rumors are she doesn't want to play anymore. Is she the best person for the main moderator here? That leaves baddessi as the only viable moderator and he hasn't been on for several days.

Rose:OK.  OK.

Any chance you can take this to gen chat or somewhere? Let's try to stay on topic here. Thanks

WatfordFC:Yes.  I e-mailed her a few days ago and she was quite fine.  She said she no longer wished to play here.  I really wonder why.  She'd just purchased a Black Rook membership!

Can anybody tell me if Harley is ok

Marfitalu:

Marfitalu: Hey, it happens to me sometimes as well, sometimes its just heavy traffic, i just re-boot and then its fine

its funny but not funNNNy, my neighbor lost his job yesterday, trying to play over 982 games to get points,i tryed to pull him away from computer, was doing to put 45 dollals in gass tank to go to ocean for the day, he told me i was crazy.lol, i'm going friday to sunday, it's not costing me anything,but the food i eat. he has no job, the internet bill ends angust first. hope he makes it.some just go over board.

5 games lol

Czuch Czuckers: Well -- of course there will be people who dispute either of those conclusions. I was not born Jewish but considered converting to Judaism while I was married to a Jewish woman; I would have been accepted into at least some congregations in the US, but I do not know whether as a convert I would have been recognized as Jewish for purposes, say, of Israeli citizenship. I doubt it. There are certainly persons of Jewish ancestry and heritage who have converted to other religions or have abandoned the Jewish faith, and still consider themselves Jewish.

I fear we have strayed far off topic here :-)

For further discussion see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_is_a_Jew

alanback: So you can be born a Jew and not belong to the religious faith of Judaism, and you can be a Jew by becoming a member of Judaism without actually being a member of the Jewish race????

Czuch Czuckers: Yes.

瀬人様: Are Jews a race of people or a people connected by a common religion, Judaism?

Please, no religious wars here.

瀬人様:

LOL!!!

I'm making a Jews-only fellowship, United Jews יהודים מאוחדים. The problem is, it's impossible to find any Jews here!

Fencer: Ok, thank you.

WatfordFC: Yes. Nothing will be lost.

The most active users list only shows Knights and Rooks and yesterday's champ was Erinity with a spendid 2479 moves.

But in the Pawns camp, spurred on by the competition, it was SafariGal who had far and away the most moves.

9. July 2006 .. 4600

Enough to put her, if she was a paid member, into the top 5 most active players of all times:

.1 francescolr ... 7621
.2 imsoaddicted ... 7227
.3 FOTBALISTA .... 5367
.4 beaupol ....... 5250
(5 SafariGal ...... 4600)
.5 Rainbow Days ... 4544

If you sign up to a Tournament where brains are required for the entry fee, and the game doesnt go ahead, do you get your brains refunded?

BIG BAD WOLF: agreed, I don't think that tourneys are a problem

Marfitalu: maybe not for him, but it might be for other players :)

especially when you are in a tournament with 2 games between all players .. for example in a reversi tournament where most games end after the same amount of moves .. so both games would end at the same time and same day

Vikings: Since it is still the "testing" month, I will give my opinion.

The limit of 1 per opponenet does seem low. Is there a way to maybe make the limit of 1 non-tournament game per day, and maybe 3-4 tournament games a day.

I know it adds to the complexity of the rules, but I see this limit as one that is to help stop some cheating - and most of that would come from non-tournament games.

Fencer: Can you some how put that on the games board, that you have used your action points with the same person for that day, so it is fair to everyone

Vikings: You can postpone the winning move to the next day.

it seems to me that 2 completed games a day should be counted with the same opponent since many people play 2 games with alternating colors, especially in tournements

actionpoints: The Ludo discussion board ( http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=115 ) would be the more appropriate board for such an announcement. :-) Thanks.

i have fast paced ludo games in the waiting room if anyione is interested

Thanks eveyone  ;)  

Groucho: every move counts, this is just about the winning points

Groucho: Yes.

BIG BAD WOLF: but points for every move?

Groucho: It means if you play 25 games with the same opponent, one 1 completed game is counted each day.

its called 'action points' so actions should be rewarded (imo)

cheating is of course not allowed, but playing fast games is. even if its with the same opponent .. its still action

using multinicks is always cheating, working together with someone else isnt (not even in ponds imo, but thats another matter :))

pawns can only have 20 games at once so it takes quite some action to reach the level as the top action players are now

there is also a ranking with most moves per day .. which is almost the same list (almost!) .. but there is no prize attached to it

i think it would be bending the rules to allow only points with different opponents .. that has little to do with the action

maybe the action points list could be separated from the list which is used to determine the prize winner though ?

as long as the action points make people move faster .. it seems to be working a bit .. (it wont make me move faster though .. i always need some time with tougher moves, but easy games or games with less option are moved fast by me)

anyway .. action points are given per move (and per win) .. thats what action is

especially if it encourages people to make friends to work together to move very fast
(there are also tournaments inside fellowships with only a few people (friends) .. those tournaments still count in the total tournament list)

Groucho: What, precisely, is your proposal. I'd like you to demonstrate how it will affect the current structure.

playBunny: The point being made is that the potential for abuse is wide open with the current structure. I'm not trying to rain on your parade. I know you are at the top of the pawns but I don't have you in mind anyway. So relax. I frankly don't really care about how the paid membership side is structured, although I think a POPL there is wise also. But in BK we have had a history of multinics etc and abuse in the past and the current Action Point structure has at least one loophole I think needs to be reconsidered.

Foxy Lady: "Not to someone who has been on here under 6 months and who is a problem.IMO thats rewarding for unruly behavior."

You obviously have someone specific in mind for such a statement Foxy Lady. If that's not baiting them then what is this baiting thing that you are on about?

Foxy Lady: Are you insinuating that *** names removed ****, all of whom have been here less than 6 months and are currently strong contenders for a membership prize, are a problem, people who have exhibited unruly behavior? Are you suggesting that these persons are cheating multi-nicks?

Please be clear about what you are saying. Innuendo does not make worthy postings.

Which is why a Per Opinionated Post Limit (POPL) is a good idea. ;-)


edit by Eriisa. Names removed

Foxy Lady: Yep!!

playBunny: Not at all. It doesn't affect me directly but I do think it's something to look at. Why do you object to a POPL? It seems reasonable to me since you play with other pawns anyway and the playing field would be leveled anyway.

A point limit per opponent would help to assure that an unscrupulous multinic couldn't win a membership or anything for that matter.

We'll find out soon enough if I'm all wet or on to something. I'm sure tomorrow other will chime in their thoughts. Or we'll get the notice. ;)

playBunny: Thats not fair at all IMO and that remark is called baiting.