Kasutajanimi: Salasõna:
Uue kasutaja registreerimine
Tsensor: Purple 
 Dama

Dama (Czech Checkers).


Sõnumeid ühel lehel:
Vestlusringide loetelu
Sa ei tohi sellesse vestlusringi kirjutada. Madalaim lubatud liikmelisustase sellesse vestlusringi kirjutamiseks on Ajuettur.
Režiim: Igaüks võib postitada
Otsi sõnumite hulgas:  

21. november 2009, 18:07:00
mangue 
thanks Hexis, it clarifies a lot ! I wish I knew it before :)

19. november 2009, 20:41:11
mangue 
mangue toimetatud (19. november 2009, 20:41:55)
why cannot I play Qh2xb8 in Czech Checkers (Dundee vs. mangue) ? at move 27black ?

12. detsember 2006, 18:48:54
mangue 
Teema: Re: Programs
Gabriel Almeida: Why doesn't Fencer do anything

because there is nothing to do, afaik, it is impossible to detect if someone use a computer here

10. detsember 2006, 00:02:36
mangue 
sure I understand, I hate cheaters too

but you can do nothing, just keep playing with your friends

9. detsember 2006, 21:54:57
mangue 
Teema: peace!
mangue toimetatud (9. detsember 2006, 21:55:21)
I better play against a human with computer as against a human accusing me to be a cheater if I win. I second Purple argument, do not miss respect to your opponent.

If you want to avoid cheaters, try to play some exotic variants like parachute checkers or anti-checkers, there are surely very few efficient program there!

 

Or try to play with some opponents you trust and who trust you and add the cheaters to your blocked users list



7. august 2006, 21:34:32
mangue 
Teema: Re:
sobek: I am totally agreing and this very certain that computer is a problem in "offline" site. This is also the main reason why I hardly ever play chess, unless I know my opponent in real life and trust him.

On the other hand, it is hopeless to get rid of computer assisted opponent. You can write code of conducts, etc...

An opponent playing only the computer moves would be bored quite quickly. However, if you do "study" with a computer, it will be almost impossible to detect.

Also, I am sure that you use a computer to play here at least to make your move and talk on the forums ;-)

7. august 2006, 11:22:33
mangue 
of course I want to have human opponents too, but it is my opponent who decides, and I cannot change it

7. august 2006, 11:16:07
mangue 
thanks sobek for not saying stupid
you seems to be certain to know who is playing with computer and who is not, so probably you know how a computer is different. By the way, are you a human or a computer

6. august 2006, 22:24:16
mangue 
cheaters are definitely annoying, but it is at least as annoying to be accused to be a cheater by a loser as to be beaten by "program"

3. september 2004, 08:09:02
mangue 
wtg fencer!

14. august 2004, 14:15:14
mangue 
it would be an enhancement to be forced to take the most pawns

26. aprill 2004, 14:17:04
mangue 
Teema: Re: If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them.
it is then too easy for one player with one queen to draw, for example by playing a1-h8-a1-h8, which draws even against 12 queens !

25. aprill 2004, 17:55:05
mangue 
Teema: Re: If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them.
my problem is that I often do not read the rules without enough care! Then I get surprised LOL

16. aprill 2004, 16:37:27
mangue 
Teema: If the player has more possibilities to capture opponent's pieces, he/she can select any of them.
I have been quite surprised by this rule actually, in "french checkers", you must capture the most pawns possible. That is, if you have one move with one capture, and one move with two captures, you have to play the move with two captures.

Ok, regards
M.

Kuupäev ja kellaaeg
Sisselogitud sõbrad
Lemmik-vestlusgrupid
Sõpruskonnad
Päeva vihje
Autoriõigus © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kõik õigused kaitstud.
Tagasi algusse