User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229   > >>
7. July 2007, 02:57:33
gogul 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
Jim Dandy: Who knows, the FIDE might be an authority but I'm still in doupt. Isn't chess the most simple game on earth?

7. July 2007, 02:51:28
The Col 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
gogul: Maybe a shortage of opportunity to put them to use explains his lousy mood

7. July 2007, 02:40:28
gogul 
I got one: Fencer, your english is some of the badest english has ever seen. But that was five years ago

7. July 2007, 02:34:21
gogul 
Thanks, that was a funny one. Next

7. July 2007, 02:34:11
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
srnity: And I kept it pithy.

7. July 2007, 02:33:07
gogul 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
Jim Dandy: If you've seen kintori's profile you could think about many safes

7. July 2007, 02:23:29
srnity 
Subject: Re:
Tigger: Thanks..... that was enlightening and educational....................................

7. July 2007, 02:21:12
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: More likely logged on but away from her computer. I do that all the time. Plus you can't see the boards if you are busy playing the games. :) But never fear, I am here. I'm of no real help but I'm here.

However, I will be remiss if I don't point out the inconsistency in K calling for adherence to an unwritten social contract while simultaneously severely violating several principles of the written one (User's Agreement).

But then I'm a , what do I know?


7. July 2007, 02:20:56
srnity 
Subject: Re:
.......and I just gave it the "boot" to page two.......

7. July 2007, 02:19:43
srnity 
Two Hours And Running............................glad there wasn't any money involved

7. July 2007, 02:03:06
Bernice 
Not a Floosie is online and has been all along I think.....she must just be logged on and isnt watching the boards

7. July 2007, 01:56:49
alanback 
Subject: Hide
Looks like I put the k-word on hide just in time.

7. July 2007, 01:35:38
Bernice 
when a Mod comes on....they will take the whole lot and no-one will ever see it again LOLOL....goes to show they dont have enough Globals Mods if there isnt any on at this moment....it will be interesting to see how long this stays, and they worry about children seeing such things....should be more Mods....

7. July 2007, 01:28:34
srnity 
Subject: Re:
Anybody else wanna guess (or extrapolate) ?

7. July 2007, 01:26:04
Vikings 
Subject: Re:
srnity: it's friday night. I give it a b it longer, I would say the late nighters in europe should be getting home in an hour or so

7. July 2007, 01:19:40
srnity 
Subject: Re:
Vikings: It's the only reason I'm still here - it's been one hour and one minute...I give it fifteen more

7. July 2007, 01:18:11
Vikings 
nah, I say we start a pool to see how long it takes to get rid of the post

7. July 2007, 01:15:00
Jason 
Subject: hey fencer
I want the magic wand so i can make him dissapear

7. July 2007, 01:08:24
srnity 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
Jim Dandy: Safe is good - works for me

7. July 2007, 01:07:04
The Col 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
gogul: I'm putting my money on safe.Happy seems a longshot at best.

7. July 2007, 01:03:48
srnity 
Subject: Re:
gogul: ROFLMBO

7. July 2007, 01:03:47
gogul 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
kintori: Most important thing is to feel happy and safe

7. July 2007, 01:00:54
gogul 
To extrapolate, what an interesting word! To conclude out of the behavior of a funktion inside a mathematical sphere on it's behavior outside of this sphere. Hmmm, so the breaks on my bike probably won't work to use them on my energyneutral powercar.

7. July 2007, 00:28:25
wetware 
Subject: The Social Contract
...worth the paper it's printed on.

7. July 2007, 00:27:06
srnity 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
kintori: Whooooooooooooooa Big Guy

7. July 2007, 00:26:57
Bernice 
Subject: Re: OOPS
Jim Dandy: hahahaha I reckon....this would get a life ban here I would say LOL, and he just paid for 2 years membership.....what a waste LOL

7. July 2007, 00:26:26
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: OOPS
Jim Dandy:

7. July 2007, 00:25:20
The Col 
Subject: Re: OOPS
Bernice: I'd hate to see his reaction if they got his order wrong at Denny's

7. July 2007, 00:21:33
Bernice 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
kintori: OOPS

6. July 2007, 23:58:49
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
Fencer: FREE Brainking! :)

6. July 2007, 23:48:13
srnity 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
Fencer: And rules are made to be broken...............j/k

6. July 2007, 23:10:59
Fencer 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
kintori: What makes you think that FIDE rules are applied here?
Actually, FIDE or any other organization has absolutely no authority on BrainKing. We have our own rules.

6. July 2007, 22:41:57
Sylfest Strutle 
Subject: Re: point of FIDE chess law
kintori: Oh well.

6. July 2007, 20:11:44
alanback 
Subject: Re: Rated games
pauloaguia:  Probably just as well.  I got myself banned from IYT for a short time on account of my "spidering" their site.  Of course, I was collecting information on all users, not just myself, and my scripts used to run for 6 to 8 hours at a time.

6. July 2007, 19:26:35
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Team ratings
Gabriel Almeida: Team tournament matches.

6. July 2007, 18:31:33
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Rated games
alanback: I know all that (even some CGI) but I'm just lazy to do it
Thanks for the briefing anyway.

6. July 2007, 18:21:44
alanback 
Subject: Re: Rated games
pauloaguia:  How good are you at cgi scripts?  I used to compile statistics on the tournament games at ItsYourTurn by downloading web pages and extracting the necessary information from them.  I wrote a couple of scripts in perl that automated most of the process.  In this case, I see the graph page has a URL of the form The">http://brainking.com/en/BKRGraph?u=2741&tp=23
 
The only thing you would have to change in the URL to download different graphs would be the "tp=nnn".  You could either make a data set of all the game types you play, or just download graphs for every type of game that is played.  If you wanted to you could then extract the line showing "Counted Games", and print out a report showing counted games w/t/l for each game type.


6. July 2007, 18:18:38
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Team ratings
Team Tournament's games are counted in team ratings?

6. July 2007, 15:25:52
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Rated games
coan.net: thank you.
(Now to figure out a way to process the information out of 103 pages in one shot...)

6. July 2007, 14:16:19
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Rated games
pauloaguia: You can look at your BKR graph.

For example, your graph for Amazon Chess: http://brainking.com/en/BKRGraph?u=9839&tp=58

25 completed games, but 21 counted games (BKR Rated) - listed above the graph

6. July 2007, 11:26:17
pauloaguia 
Subject: Rated games
Is there anywhere on BK where we can see how many rated games we have finished of a certain game type?
On my profile there's a table with all the victories, losses and draws of the games I've finished, but that's for counted games. That is, it includes games that were counted but not rated, and games that have finished before 2 moves were made.

So, is there anywhere I can see how many rated games I finished for a certain game type?

6. July 2007, 09:43:44
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: How fortunate
kintori: please take this discussion to the general chat board, or to the board inside the fellowship.

this board is about brainking and its system, the problem you describe isnt with brainking but with the players. a draw offer can be made, a draw offer can be accepted, wether or not a player does one of those things is up to the players and not a decision for the brainking system.

any further posts on this board about this subject will be removed

6. July 2007, 04:26:50
The Col 
Subject: Re: Brainking issues
Rose: I got a two year membership for the price of one thanks to a code red

6. July 2007, 03:46:15
Rose 
Please lets get back to Brainking issues and take this to private chat or general chat. Thanks!

6. July 2007, 03:34:42
Vikings 
Subject: In the words of Tucker from "Something About Mary"
IT'S A CONSPIRACY MA-AA-AA-AN!

6. July 2007, 03:29:53
kintori 
Subject: Re: How fortunate
alanback: or thisor thisor this
or this is not well let me tell
mr or misses blocker
killing someone is very offensive to me
as i have been where it really happens
but you do not care as these smileys show

6. July 2007, 03:16:52
alanback 
Subject: How fortunate
That my social contract with BK allows me to hide users.

6. July 2007, 03:12:44
kintori 
Subject: Re: social contract
Modified by kintori (6. July 2007, 03:15:05)
danheg: \
this is at the core
player(sender) opponent(receiver)
as the game had not been started ie no moves
moves have to be made before a draw can be asked even GM draws have a number of moves made before the draw is given.
the social contract as such is this
the opponent: one, did this on his own without consulting the team as a whole or the captain, this is a team match
two, there was no attempt to ask the player if this was a mistake.
the second level is this, the ranking difference of 100+ between player and opponent
at the least opponent was just plan RUDE, at the other end he reverse cheated
in that he sandbagged player knowing that the draw offer was not a real offer and accepted so he would not have to play a much stronger player and get a 1/2 win for free. the worst kind of cheater coward
oh he has not yet resoponed though it did take him very long to accepot the draw

6. July 2007, 02:51:12
kintori 
Subject: Re: social contract
Modified by kintori (6. July 2007, 03:34:29)
emmett:
excuse me: this is not general, it is about addressing a grievance and this is the main discussion board i believed it would reach the correct venue to have the grievance dealt with but obviously i am wrong again as there has been only one person other than myself
once again, another game site that does not care about ethics, morals, or the sensibilities of other players, all you care about is that no one uses ****, ****, **** ,******* ,expletive, on and on really to bad

6. July 2007, 02:45:26
danheg 
Subject: Re: social contract
kintori: The player that sent the draw request would be the one at fault and not the one who accepted it.   Whether it was a joke (which would have been thoughtless for his/her team)  or a mistake (which can happen I guess even though it has to be confirmed) on the part fo the one sending it,  the decision to accept is not one that affects morality or honor.  The point is not to send a draw offer if it is not meant.  If it is a mistake in sending it,  it is the same as making a mistake in the game.

<< <   220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top