Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.
If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
I completely disagree! In fact i couldn't disagree more.... The act of not allowing 5 consecutive 4's for example or a specific series of rolls, because it doesn't seem fair for one player, is completely out of the philosophy of a luck-based game.......!
A good random number generator is important for having a decent Backgammon game, but having a bad random number generator is not unfair as long as the system doesn't give advantage to a specific player. If there is a flaw at the RNG, but there is no advantage settled from before for a specific player, then everything is fair.
And as i want to believe and believe, that there is no advantage given to any player, then every hypothetical flaw giving too many consecutive doubles, is not unfair. Of cource as i've said, such a flaw doesn't give a decent Backgammon game.......
But i wonder, i have played 450+ Backgammon games here and i have never seen more than 2 consecutive doubles for a player........In fact i can even complain about too "normal" distribution of the rolls......And this is a fact in my opinion. Also it's a fact that there are no wild series of rolls and this is somewhat related to my other observation.
PlayBunny
on the bar when there's an open point. Nine rolls on the trot and I can't get one of the 11/36 rolls that will let me in? That's beyond belief! But it "happens regularly", so let's fix that one please.
The probability for this is: (11/36)^9 = 0.002% so my goat sacrifices paid off....
Chessmaster1000: Lol. RNG?? A TLA from the man who doesn't use abbreviations?
Luke Skywalker: Hah! I've been making that mistake for ... ever!! Yes, dancing for 9 rolls is reasonable at 4%. Even a 12-roll dance is not totally unbelievable at 1.25% and staying on the bar for 4, 5 or 6 rolls is almost to be expected at 23.3%, 16.2% and 11.2% respectively.
Thanks for pointing that out, Luke. Lol. I've been playing correctly, according to those figures, but, having made the wrong assumption all that time ago about the maths, my experience of seeing long dances so frequently was at odds with my understanding of the probabilities. When I read your correction it was a real Doh moment.
playBunny: i did change my profile thank you very much backgammon is a frustrating game but i've learned to cope with the stress... lol just kidding i don't even care anymore.
please read what I have said on gen chat about the RSS at top right hand and also the orange square at bottom right hand....I dont want to spam the boards :)
Fencer: That link was hard to find. Took me several pages to find that page .. did I miss it or is it obscure? It's only because I knew that it exists somewhere that I went looking. I doubt that eagle eye would find it (except by accident when exploring, which is how I know).
I went via BrainKing Staff at the bottom of this page, then Eriisa (because Purple mentioned her). She has a link "Member of BrainKing.com customer service" on her profile page. From that I tried the Representatives link (not a word that spells money!) and only then did I see the alternative payment method.
There's surely a quicker way to that page but it wasn't from Paid membership which is the most obvious place.
eagle eye: I find that Paypal works best for me. I tried Moneybookers, but it wants lots of ID requirements. I guess it really depneds on which country you live in, as others had said.
LOL, and Purple can call me anything as long as its not 'late to dinner'!!!
Eriisa: yes eriisa i used money bookers teh first time, but my mum used paypal due to the id requirements needed, think its a newish thing they've introduced
ArtfulDodger: I think wellywales means the magic spells that he's casting to get the right dice. A bit too much frog sweat or powdered spider's web, or a badly drawn symbol, and the dice are off by just a touch. ;o)
wellywales: No spell checker is perfect plus sometimes it might be confusing for the reader...I recommend not to use any, we will definitely know what you want to say
Maxxina: Huh? I think you need a translator yourself...
rod03801: In web design you need them if you are conforming to the newer standards (ie., xhtml). It's advisable to use them if there is a space in the url.
I always use them without question so I've not tested that. So, here's a couple of googles with and without:
harley,I hope this in not interpretd as being sarcastic..but this is the general board?is there a rigid topic range?
any way your right I was being silly,enought of that.
(hide) If you don't want other users to know what you are doing you can change into cloak mode in Settings (paying members only). (pauloaguia) (show all tips)