User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Knight.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344   > >>
29. January 2006, 17:01:57
harley 
If they're writing a long post on a board, it might show them as being offline (they drop off the list) because they haven't changed a page for a while, they've been incative, even though they may be typing or doing something else. But as soon as they hit 'send' it should show them as being on that board again. I haven't noticed anything wrong with my friends list lately.

29. January 2006, 19:21:15
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
harley: what ive seen is even after that Harley,, they will go to another board and post and still not show..

But anyways.. as soon as the person submits th epost, then surely at that point, it should then update the list?

29. January 2006, 21:02:36
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Strange action reporting
Stevie: Yes, I can confirm that.

Profile: JMDLOVESNirvana
Last action: 29. January 2006, 19:39:33 - browsing main page

Posted in the Flame Pit:
JMDLOVESNirvana (hide) Re: 29. January 2006, 19:56:00
"Blah, blah..."

Both of the above were copied at 20:00 and the profile information is clearly out of synch.

29. January 2006, 21:03:57
Stevie 
Subject: Re: Strange action reporting
playBunny: and he has made at least 6 posts in between 19:39 and 20:00

this is what i see with many players at times

29. January 2006, 21:05:43
Stevie 
Subject: Re: Strange action reporting
Stevie: and then after it turns an hour,, he shows oonline again now... was it the site hourly catchup script that put it right?

29. January 2006, 21:11:31
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Strange action reporting
Stevie: It does look something like that - the profile info's fallen behind again...

Profile: JMDLOVESNirvana
Last action: 29. January 2006, 20:05:25 - viewing profile (Andre Faria)

Posted in the Flame Pit:
JMDLOVESNirvana (hide) Re: [something or other] 29. January 2006, 20:08:50
Blah, blah...

29. January 2006, 23:49:56
dameningen 
Modified by dameningen (29. January 2006, 23:55:43)
How big can the time out or pond time be in negative, normally? I got now -42 min in Pond. I would like to go sleep put i have to move in that first .

29. January 2006, 23:55:56
Czuch 
not more than 1 hour, i think.

30. January 2006, 05:40:47
Vikings 
Subject: Re:
Salkkuman: Pond games with negative numbers will cycle at aprox. 5 mins. after the hour

1. February 2006, 09:44:27
Fencer 
Subject: First winner
Congratulations to plaintiger for being the first one who won the membership bonus. He's been given 6 free months of the Brain Rook level.

1. February 2006, 10:10:42
plaintiger 
Subject: Re: First winner
Fencer: yay, me! thanks, Filip! :)

i will say that now that i understand the new prize with an entry fee tournament model, i discover i would have liked winning those 200 brains as well! that kind of tournament sounds like fun! :)

very cool improvements about the place, sir. and thanks again for the bonus! :)

1. February 2006, 11:08:09
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re: First winner
Fencer: What is "membership bonus".....? And how Plaintiger won it....?

1. February 2006, 11:10:54
Fencer 
Subject: Re: First winner
Pythagoras: RTSN!
Which means "Read The Server News".

1. February 2006, 11:17:34
Chicago Bulls 
I did just now..... So Plaintiger renewed his membership for 1 year and been lucky enough to be at the good-50% winning another 6 months, right.....?

1. February 2006, 11:22:41
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: Precisely.

1. February 2006, 11:25:43
oldhamgirl 
I have just renewed my membership and got 6 extra months, thanks

1. February 2006, 11:26:37
playBunny 
Fencer: In the Single Elimination Tournaments are the pairings done by taking every two BKRs (ie the top and 2nd, the 3rd and 4th, etc..) or by folding the top half onto the bottom half (eg, in a 8-player tourney, the 1st and 5th, 2nd and 6th, etc)?

1. February 2006, 11:33:33
Chicago Bulls 
Modified by Chicago Bulls (1. February 2006, 11:49:51)
Also what do you mean there by: "a two year membership payment makes a good change to get the whole year for free"?

I don't mean that you should have changed the "change" with "chance" (a thing that you should do) i mean the following question:

There is not any 2 year membership available as i see! Only for ½ year or 1 year!
If you mean buying 2 one year memberships at the same time, then i have another strategy:

1)Buying 2 one year memberships at the same time:
Current COST = 2·28 = 56 €
New COST = 2·30 = 60 €
Probability of getting 1 year for free = 50 %
Probability of getting AT LEAST 6 months for free = 50 %
Probability of getting EXACTLY 6 months for free = 0 %


2)Buying 1 one year membership now and the other day another one:
Current COST = 2·28 = 56 €
New COST = 2·30 = 60 €
Probability of getting AT LEAST 6 months for free = 75%
Probability of getting 1 year for free = 25%
Probability of getting EXACTLY 6 months for free = 50%


So what we have is that buying with the second method 2 years, you get 75% of having at least 6 months for free or even 25% for 1 year for free. While with "your" proposed way we have 50% for 1 year for free but if we don't suceed we get nothing more....

I would choose my proposed way as i prefer better chances than better prizes, if actually you will allow the BONUS to be valid this way....According to the aforementioned rules for the bonus, my way is 100% legal.....

1. February 2006, 11:37:51
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: I believe on your second method the odds are more like:
Probability of getting nothing for free = 25%
Probability of getting 6 months for free = 50%
Probability of getting 1 year for free = 25%

1. February 2006, 11:40:45
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
pauloaguia: Nope.....

1. February 2006, 11:40:55
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
playBunny: The latter (two halfs and pairing).

1. February 2006, 11:43:01
Chicago Bulls 
Actually you might be right and i'm a bit confused right now....

1. February 2006, 11:45:22
Chicago Bulls 
Modified by Chicago Bulls (1. February 2006, 11:47:33)
Now i'm not confused and here is how it is:


Probability of getting nothing for free = 25%
Probability of getting EXACTLY 6 months for free = 50%
Probability of getting 1 year for free = 25%


Probability of getting nothing for free = 25%
Probability of getting AT LEAST 6 months for free = 50%
Probability of getting 1 year for free = 25%

I was refering to AT LEAST while you at EXACTLY 6 months....

1. February 2006, 11:46:33
Luke Skywalker 
Subject: brains
combining data from the brains and the paid membership pages:
- I could pay 18 euro for a year brain knight
or
- I pay 18 euro to get 540 brains, 500 of which I use for a year of brain knight and still have 40 brains

1. February 2006, 11:49:35
Eriisa 
Subject: Find tournaments:
When I try to find tourney of 'Single Elimination' It says there are none.

I created 'Single Elimination Back' and that does not show on the search. (trg=13429)

Are we doing something wrong in the creation?

1. February 2006, 11:52:50
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Find tournaments:
Eriisa: Nope. It's my fault, a small bug in the counter table.
But if you search the keyword "single", your tournament will be found.

1. February 2006, 11:56:33
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Single Elimination Tournament pairings
Fencer: "The latter (two halfs and pairing)."

Excellent.

(Perhaps that snippet of info could be added to the Help text, just for completeness?)

1. February 2006, 11:58:12
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Single Elimination Tournament pairings
playBunny: It will be added.

1. February 2006, 12:04:30
Luke Skywalker 
Subject: Re: Find tournaments:
Fencer: and if you search for free prize tournaments, you'll find the entry-fee tournament as well

1. February 2006, 12:11:32
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: I'm not trying to get funnyor anything... but don't you mean:
Probability of getting AT LEAST 6 months for free = 75%
?

1. February 2006, 12:13:10
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
pauloaguia: Yep and this is true.....While it is also true that exactly 6 months is 50%.

1. February 2006, 12:20:45
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re: Fencer....
Fencer: .
.
.
But Fencer you didn't answer my questions and as a most curious person i'm looking forward.....

To save you of the reading of my somewhat difficult to read posts here are the points:

1)Should in the:......
"a two year membership payment makes a good change to get the whole year for free"?
.......the word "change" should have replaced with "chance"?


2)There is not any 2 year membership available for buying! Only a ½ year or 1 year!
Do you mean buying 2 one year memberships at the same time......?

1. February 2006, 12:50:35
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Fencer....
Pythagoras: 1) My usual typo. 2) Yes.

1. February 2006, 14:36:56
Beren the 32nd 
Subject: Prize tournaments with an entry fee
How would 3rd prize be decided?
I'm thinking especially of the case where there are two sections, with their winners playing in a final.

1. February 2006, 14:40:35
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Prize tournaments with an entry fee
Beren the 32nd: It will be up to the tournament creator.

1. February 2006, 17:23:13
Andre Faria 
I love the new features... Well done Filip... :)

1. February 2006, 19:04:35
Fencer 

1. February 2006, 19:41:59
Czuch 
Are brains the only currency to use in these new tournaments? What if I have no brains?

1. February 2006, 19:43:16
Stevie 
Subject: Re: What if I have no brains?
Czuch Chuckers: You follow the yellow brick road cos the Wizard could help you out

1. February 2006, 20:05:29
Eriisa 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: gotta admit.... You left yourself open for that one! lol !!!

1. February 2006, 20:35:37
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Marfitalu: Ahhh... thanks, I didnt see that!
Can we do a cash tournament as well?

1. February 2006, 20:39:29
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Cash tournaments
Modified by playBunny (1. February 2006, 20:39:54)
Czuch: One key aspect of Brains is that it isn't cash and therefore the tourneys cannot fall foul of gambling prohibitions. (Do a search for gambling on the Features Requests board where there was a conversation about it.)

1. February 2006, 20:45:38
alanback 
Subject: Re: Cash tournaments
playBunny: Putting on my lawyer hat, I'm not sure that's true, if Brains can be purchased for cash.

1. February 2006, 20:53:20
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Cash tournaments
alanback: Lol. I haven't got a lawyer's hat to be not sure with but that's okay - I'm already not sure that's true. I'm just remembering bits of conversation from the Feature's Board.

1. February 2006, 22:54:41
Fwiffo 
The "link" link in the upper right corner of each message is perfect! It is new, right?

1. February 2006, 22:55:30
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Fwiffo: Right.

1. February 2006, 23:46:03
Chicago Bulls 
I have 3 questions. If you are too lazy to answer all 3 then the first is of the most importance for me!


1)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Rook membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Rook membership....

B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 11-months of Rook membership.....

A) or B) is valid?

---------------------------------------
--------
2)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Knight membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Knight membership....

B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 5-months of rook membership and then 6 motnhs of Knight membership....

C)Something else.....

Is A) or B) or C) valid?

---------------------------------------
------
3)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Maharajah membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Maharajah membership....

B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 5-months of Rook membership and then 6 months of Maharajah membeship....

C)Something else.....

A) or B) or C) is valid?
----------------------------------------------

1. February 2006, 23:54:00
alanback 
Subject: Bonus
I'm risk averse. Instead of a 50% chance at a 50% bonus, can I have a 25% bonus guaranteed?

2. February 2006, 00:02:57
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re: Bonus
Modified by Chicago Bulls (2. February 2006, 00:03:12)
alanback: I was thinking the same......
This system is like:

  • You completed a purchase of 6 months membership and won another 3 months!

    Or......:

  • You completed a purchase of 6 months membership
    and DIDN'T WIN any bonus you sucker.....

  • 2. February 2006, 00:04:02
    playBunny 
    Subject: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
    Pythagoras: I believe the answer to 1) is that you don't actually buy memberships, per se, you buy membership extensions. It's just that with some people they are extending their Pawnness into Rookhood. So it would be B).

    I asked a similar question to 2) and 3) way back whenever and got the answer "Fencer would work something out", so I'll be interested to hear any further elucidation.

    << <   335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344   > >>
    Date and time
    Friends online
    Favourite boards
    Fellowships
    Tip of the day
    Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
    Back to the top